Cited by 114Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Socioeconomic correlates of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in primary care: the GADIS II study (Generalized Anxiety and Depression Impact Survey II)

Open access
Ansseau, Marc, Fischler, Benjamin, Dierick, Michel, Albert, Adelin, Leyman, Sophie, Mignon, Annick·2008·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

A previous Generalized Anxiety Disorder Impact Survey (GADIS I) performed on 15,399 Belgian patients consulting their primary care physicians, revealed high prevalences of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depression (MD) with important regional differences. The objective of this study (GADIS II) was to replicate previous findings and to evaluate the role of socioeconomic factors in the diagnoses of GAD and MD. A large-scale cross-sectional survey was conducted in a random sample of 377 general practitioners distributed geographically over Belgium and Luxemburg. Each physician was asked to screen 40 consecutive patients at predefined time periods for the presence of GAD and MD using sections of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Socioeconomic parameters were collected. The level of impairment was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale. In a sample of 13,699 patients, point prevalences of GAD and of MD were found to be 13.4 and 11.0%, respectively. Overall, 17.8% of the population was positive for GAD and/or MD. Both disorders were significantly more frequent in women than in men. Marked regional differences were observed with prevalences for GAD and/or MD of 24.2% in Brussels, 22.7% in Wallonia, 13.6% in Luxemburg and 12.9% in Flanders. Several socioeconomic factors were significantly associated with positive diagnoses: living alone, a low level of education and unemployment. However, regional differences remained significant even after controlling for socioeconomic factors. The study confirms the high prevalence of GAD and MD in primary care and the role of several socioeconomic and regional factors in the illnesses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20306

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Before the pandemic, women, younger adults, people with less education or lower socioeconomic position, Black, Asian, and minority ethnic individuals, and people living alone were more likely to have higher depression and anxiety than their comparison groups.

    “Women, younger adults, individuals with lower educational attainment and socioeconomic position, individuals from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds, and individuals living alone are more likely to experience higher levels of depression and anxiety than men, older adults, individuals with higher educational attainment and socioeconomic position, individuals from white backgrounds”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Depression and Anxiety 15206394, 2008, 6, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/da.20306 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [26/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ansseau, M., Fischler, B., Dierick, M., Albert, A., Leyman, S., & Mignon, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE)
Corresponding author
Ansseau, Marc
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2008
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
506-513
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2125784054
Cited by
114
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, socioeconomic factors, primary care, prevalence, regional variation, living alone, educational attainment, unemployment, sex differences, disability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Belgium, Combined Modality Therapy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Family Practice, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Luxembourg, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychotherapy, Socioeconomic Factors, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review