Cited by 541Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Depression Comorbid with Anxiety: Results from the WHO Study on Psychological Disorders in Primary Health Care

Sartorius, Nornam, Üstün, T. Bedirhan, Lecrubier, Yves, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich·1996·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The World Health Organization collaborative study on “Psychological Problems in General Health Care” investigated the form, frequency, course and outcome of common psychological problems in primary care settings at 15 international sites. The research employed a two-stage case-finding procedure. GHQ–12 was administered to 25 916 adults who consulted health-care services. The second-stage assessment (n=5438) consisted of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (GDI), the Social Disability Schedule, and questionnaires. Possible cases or borderline cases of mental disorder, and a sample of known cases, were followed up at three months and one year. Using standard diagnostic algorithms (ICD–10), prevalence rates were calculated for current disorder (one-month) and lifetime experience disorder. Well-defined psychological problems are frequent in all the general health-care settings examined (median 24.0%). Among the most common were depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse, somatoform disorders, and neurasthenia. Nine per cent of patients suffered from a “subthreshold condition” that did not meet diagnostic criteria but had clinically significant symptoms and functional impairment. The most common co-occurrence was depression and anxiety. Comorbidity increases the likelihood of recognition of mental disorders in general health care, and the likelihood of receiving treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/s0007125000298395

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sartorius, N., Üstün, T. B., Lecrubier, Y., & Wittchen, H.-U.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Üstün, T. Bedirhan
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1996-06
Volume
168
Issue
S30
Pages
38-43
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2765030473
Cited by
541
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
18.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
depression, anxiety, comorbidities, primary care, mental illness, prevalence, mental disorder recognition, treatment seeking, alcohol abuse, somatoform disorders, neurasthenia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Professional Impairment, Psychotropic Drugs, Sampling Studies, World Health Organization, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review