Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is major concern about the impact of the global COVID-19 outbreak on mental health. Several studies suggest that mental health deteriorated in many countries before and during enforced isolation (ie, lockdown), but it remains unknown how mental health has changed week by week over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to explore the trajectories of anxiety and depression over the 20 weeks after lockdown was announced in England, and compare the growth trajectories by individual characteristics. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal observational study, we analysed data from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study, a panel study weighted to population proportions, which collects information on anxiety (using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment) and depressive symptoms (using the Patient Health Questionnaire) weekly in the UK since March 21, 2020. We included data from adults living in England who had at least three repeated measures between March 23 and Aug 9, 2020. Analyses were done using latent growth models, which were fitted to account for sociodemographic and health covariates. FINDINGS: Between March 23, and Aug 9, data from over 70 000 adults were collected in the UCL COVID-19 Social Study. When including participants living in England with three follow-up measures and no missing values, our analytic sample consisted of 36 520 participants. The average depression score was 6·6 (SD=6·0, range 0-27) and the average anxiety score 5·7 (SD=5·6, range 0-21) in week 1. Anxiety and depression levels both declined across the first 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown in England (b=-1·93, SE=0·26, p<0·0001 for anxiety; b=-2·52, SE=0·28, p<0·0001 for depressive symptoms). The fastest decreases were seen across the strict lockdown period (between weeks 2 and 5), with symptoms plateauing as further lockdown easing measures were introduced (between weeks 16 and 20). Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown. Many of these inequalities in experiences were reduced as lockdown continued, but differences were still evident 20 weeks after the start of lockdown. INTERPRETATION: These data suggest that the highest levels of depression and anxiety occurred in the early stages of lockdown but declined fairly rapidly, possibly because individuals adapted to circumstances. Our findings emphasise the importance of supporting individuals in the lead-up to future lockdowns to try to reduce distress, and highlight that groups already at risk for poor mental health before the pandemic have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath. FUNDING: Nuffield Foundation, UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome Trust.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 42 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The growth trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms were non-linear.
“The growth trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms showed a non-linear pattern (appendix p 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Being younger was a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
In week 1, the distribution of depression severity was: 48% minimal, 27% mild, 13% moderate, 8% moderately severe, and 5% severe.
“8228 (48%) participants had a score of 0–4 suggesting minimal depression, 4578 (27%) had a score of 5–9 indicating mild depression, 2218 (13%) had a score of 10–14 indicating moderate depression, 1290 (8%) had a score of 15–19 indicating moderately severe depression, and 776 (5%) had a score of 20–27 indicating severe depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Anxiety and depressive symptoms plateaued between weeks 16 and 20 as lockdown easing measures were introduced.
“The fastest decreases were seen across the strict lockdown period (between weeks 2 and 5), with symptoms plateauing as further lockdown easing measures were introduced (between weeks 16 and 20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
In week 1, the distribution of anxiety severity was: 53% minimal, 24% mild, 12% moderate, and 10% severe.
“9123 (53%) participants had a score of 0–4 suggesting minimal anxiety, 4111 (24%) had a score of 5–9 indicating mild anxiety, 2092 (12%) had a score of 10–14 indicating moderate anxiety, and 1764 (10%) had a score of 15–21 indicating severe anxiety (appendix p 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Depressive symptom levels declined over the first 20 weeks after lockdown began in England (b=-2.52, SE=0.28, p<0.0001).
“Anxiety and depression levels both declined across the first 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown in England (b=–1·93, SE=0·26, p<0·0001 for anxiety; b=–2·52, SE=0·28, p<0·0001 for depressive symptoms).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
Living with children was a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
No evidence was found that ethnicity was associated with baseline mental health (b=0.19, p=0.434 for anxiety; b=0.45, p=0.064 for depressive symptoms).
“No evidence was found that ethnicity was associated with baseline mental health (b=0·19, p=0·434 for anxiety; b=0·45, p=0·064 for depressive symptoms).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“Our models suggested that ethnicity was not a risk factor for worse mental health.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Findingown data
In week 1, the average depression score was 6.6 (SD 6.0, range 0-27).
“The average depression score was 6·6 (SD=6·0, range 0–27) and the average anxiety score 5·7 (SD=5·6, range 0–21) in week 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The fastest decreases in anxiety and depressive symptoms occurred during the strict lockdown period between weeks 2 and 5.
“The fastest decreases were seen across the strict lockdown period (between weeks 2 and 5), with symptoms plateauing as further lockdown easing measures were introduced (between weeks 16 and 20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
Living alone was a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
Being a woman was a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
In week 1, the average GAD-7 score was 5.7 (SD 5.6; range 0-21).
“In week 1, the average score on the GAD-7 was 5·7 (SD=5·6; range 0–21; table 2 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Anxiety levels declined over the first 20 weeks after lockdown began in England (b=-1.93, SE=0.26, p<0.0001).
“Anxiety and depression levels both declined across the first 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown in England (b=–1·93, SE=0·26, p<0·0001 for anxiety; b=–2·52, SE=0·28, p<0·0001 for depressive symptoms).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
Lower educational attainment was a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
Lower income was a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
The highest levels of depression and anxiety occurred in the early stages of lockdown.
“These data suggest that the highest levels of depression and anxiety occurred in the early stages of lockdown but declined fairly rapidly, possibly because individuals adapted to circumstances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In week 1, the average PHQ-9 score was 6.6 (SD 6.0; range 0-27).
“The average score on the PHQ-9 was 6·6 (SD=6·0) in week 1 (range 0–27; table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-existing mental health conditions were a risk factor for higher anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Findingown data
This study found substantial differences in experiences of mental health across the first 20 weeks following lockdown among different groups.
“This study also found substantial differences in experiences of mental health across the first 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown among different groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In week 1, the average anxiety score was 5.7 (SD 5.6, range 0-21).
“The average depression score was 6·6 (SD=6·0, range 0–27) and the average anxiety score 5·7 (SD=5·6, range 0–21) in week 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Many known risk factors for poorer mental health were associated with inequalities in mental health at the start of lockdown.
“Many known risk factors for poorer mental health were associated with inequalities in mental health at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Representative cohort studies that compared pre-pandemic data with data from the first weeks of lockdowns in different countries found higher average psychological distress scores and a larger proportion of people with clinically significant mental illness.
“Data from representative cohort studies comparing data collected before the pandemic with data collected in the first few weeks of lockdowns internationally have shown increases in average scores of psychological distress and a rise in the proportion of people experiencing clinically significant levels of mental illness.4, 5”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Studies using data from representative cohort studies revealed the substantial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on levels of depression, anxiety, and mental distress, showing increases in average scores of symptoms of psychological distress from before the pandemic to during the pandemic, and a rise in the proportion of people experiencing clinically significant levels of mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Pierce, 2020, Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Shanahan, 2020, Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study, Psychol Med
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Studies of the SARS epidemic found that people who had to quarantine had more symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
“These findings echo those from studies of previous epidemics such as the epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), during which individuals who had to quarantine experienced increases in symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.6, 7, 8, 9”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
“The studies on SARS suggested that mental health worsened during periods of quarantine or enforced isolation.6, 7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [6] Hawryluck, 2004, SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada, Emerg Infect Dis source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Reynolds, 2008, Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience, Epidemiol Infect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Mihashi, 2009, Predictive factors of psychological disorder development during recovery following SARS outbreak, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Liu, 2012, Depression after exposure to stressful events: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic, Compr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
- Interpretationown data
Mental health was adversely affected in the 20 weeks following the start of the first lockdown in England.
“This study shows that mental health was adversely affected in the 20 weeks following the start of the first lockdown in England.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous epidemic research suggested that many of these factors also predicted worse mental health during isolation.
“Findings from previous epidemics have suggested that many of these factors have also been risk factors for worse mental health during periods of isolation,15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Brooks, 2020, The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence, Lancet source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Many people began to experience improvements in mental health after the first lockdown began.
“However, since the commencement of the first lockdown, many people began to experience improvements in mental health.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Groups already at risk for poor mental health before the pandemic remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath.
“highlight that groups already at risk for poor mental health before the pandemic have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Many inequalities in mental health experiences persisted and emotionally vulnerable groups have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Interpretationown data
Known risk factors for poorer mental health were apparent early in lockdown.
“Many known risk factors for poorer mental health were apparent early in lockdown, such as women, younger adults, and individuals with lower educational attainment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The findings of improvements, particularly across early weeks following lockdown, are echoed by polling data showing improvements in many aspects of mood in repeated cross-sectional samples over the same period.
“The findings of improvements, in particular across the early weeks following the introduction of lockdown measures in England, are echoed by polling data showing improvements in many aspects of mood in repeated cross-sectional samples over the same period.10, 11”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Layard
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The analytic sample comprised 36,520 adults living in England who had at least three repeated measures and no missing values.
“When including participants living in England with three follow-up measures and no missing values, our analytic sample consisted of 36 520 participants.”
- Also stated in: § Study design and participants · plain
“providing a final analytic sample size of 36 520.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Excluding the 4000 participants who withheld demographic data does not materially bias the analytic sample.
- Also stated in: § Study design and participants · plain
- Interpretationcitation
The improvements in mental health over the strict lockdown period suggest a process of adaptation similar to literature on other types of isolation, such as incarceration where depression levels can stabilise or decrease as new coping strategies emerge.
“The improvements in mental health over this strict lockdown period suggest a process of adaptation that bears similarities to literature on other types of isolation: for example, some studies of incarceration have shown that depression levels can stabilise and even decrease month after month as new coping strategies emerge.29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Porter, 2019, Beyond the dichotomy: incarceration dosage and mental health, Criminology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
This finding suggests that mental illness did not necessarily predispose individuals to greater levels of emotional reactivity.
“This finding suggests that mental illness did not necessarily predispose individuals to greater levels of emotional reactivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Differences in mental health at baseline are probably attributable to pre-existing social inequalities that have been exacerbated over the past decade.
“But differences in mental health at baseline are probably attributable to pre-existing social inequalities that have been exacerbated over the past decade.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Marmot, 2020, Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Because the study was internet based, participants without home access to internet were not represented.
“Furthermore, as the study was internet based, participants without home access to internet were not represented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These data suggest that individuals might be able to adapt relatively fast to the new psychological demands of life in lockdown.
“yet these data also suggest that individuals might be able to adapt relatively fast to the new psychological demands of life in lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 44
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataInequalities by gender, age, education, income, and mental health were all still present at the end of the 20 weeks.
“Inequalities by gender, age, education, income, and mental health were all still present at the end of the 20 weeks.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Nevertheless, many inequalities in mental health experiences (such as inequalities by age and gender) did remain and emotionally vulnerable groups (such as individuals with existing mental health conditions or individuals living alone) have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the weighted sample, 20% reported having a diagnosed mental illness.
“7270 (20%) participants of the weighted sample reported having a diagnosed mental illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe slopes varied across stages: there was a sharp decline in depressive symptoms and anxiety between weeks 2 and 5 during strict lockdown, but little change between weeks 16 and 20 after substantial easing.
“For instance, there was a sharp decline in depressive symptoms and anxiety between weeks 2 and 5 during the strict lockdown period, but little change was observed between weeks 16 and 20 after substantial easing of lockdown had taken place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong participants with pre-existing diagnosed mental illness, 61% had moderate or severe depression (average 12.3) and 54% had at least moderate anxiety (average 10.6).
“Among the 3168 participants with a pre-existing diagnosed mental illness, 1929 (61%) had a score of 10 or higher indicating moderate or severe depression (average score 12·3 [SD=6·7]) and 1703 (54%) had a score of 10 or higher indicating at least moderate anxiety (average score 10·6 [SD=5·8]; table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong participants without pre-existing diagnosed mental illness, 16% had anxiety (average 4.6) and 17% had depression (average 5.1).
“Among the 13 923 participants without a pre-existing diagnosed mental illness, 2153 (16%) had anxiety (average score 4·6 [SD=4·9]) and 2356 (17%) depression (average score 5·1 [SD=5·0]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIndividuals living with children had higher anxiety (b=0.70, p<0.0001) but lower depressive symptoms (b=-0.37, p=0.029) than individuals living alone.
“Individuals living with children had higher levels of anxiety (b=0·70, p<0·0001) but lower levels of depressive symptoms (b=–0·37, p=0·029) than individuals living alone, whereas individuals living alone had higher levels of depressive symptoms but similar levels of anxiety to people living with other adults but without children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIndividuals living alone had higher depressive symptoms but similar anxiety to people living with other adults without children.
“Individuals living with children had higher levels of anxiety (b=0·70, p<0·0001) but lower levels of depressive symptoms (b=–0·37, p=0·029) than individuals living alone, whereas individuals living alone had higher levels of depressive symptoms but similar levels of anxiety to people living with other adults but without children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver the 20 weeks following lockdown, anxiety symptoms significantly decreased (b=-1.93, SE=0.26, p<0.0001) and depressive symptoms significantly decreased (b=-2.52, SE=0.28, p<0.0001).
“Over the 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown, there was a significant decrease in both anxiety (b=–1·93, SE=0·26, p<0·0001) and depressive symptoms (b=–2·52, SE=0·28, p<0·0001) both during the strict lockdown period and the period in which restrictions were eased from May 10, 2020 (figure 1).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Results show that anxiety and depressive symptoms both declined across the first 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown in England.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the unweighted sample, 76% were women, 70% had an undergraduate degree or above, and 5% were from BAME backgrounds.
“27 699 (76%) of the 36 520 participants were women and there was an over-representation of people with an undergraduate degree or above (n=25 653, 70%) and an under-representation of people from BAME backgrounds (n=1839, 5%; table 1 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAnxiety and depressive symptom trajectories were positively associated, with significant covariance between intercepts (20.46, p<0.0001) and slopes (18.64, p<0.0001).
“The growth trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms were positively associated with each other as evidenced by the significant covariance between the two intercepts (20·46, p<0·0001) and slopes (18·64, p<0·0001; appendix p 11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the beginning of lockdown, women, younger adults, people with lower educational attainment, people from lower-income households, and people with pre-existing mental health conditions reported higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms.
“At the beginning of the lockdown, women, younger adults, people with lower levels of educational attainment, people from lower-income households, and people with pre-existing mental health conditions reported higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms (table 3 ).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Being female or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms at the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was no evidence that the rate of change was associated with ethnicity, household income, or pre-existing mental health conditions.
“There was no evidence that the rate of change was associated with ethnicity, household income, or pre-existing mental health conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAcross the 20 weeks, women, younger adults, people with lower educational attainment, and people living with children had faster improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms than men, older adults, people with higher educational attainment, and people living without children, narrowing some gaps present at the start.
“However, some groups, including women, younger adults, and individuals with lower educational attainment, had faster improvements in symptoms, thereby reducing the differences between these vulnerable groups and other groups over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPeople living alone had the same trajectories of depressive symptoms as people living with other adults but no children (b=0.04, p=0.77), but their overall levels of depressive symptoms were consistently higher.
“People living alone had the same trajectories of depressive symptoms as did people living with other adults but no children (living with other adults but no children vs living alone: b=0·04, p=0·77), but their overall levels of depressive symptoms were consistently higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany inequalities in anxiety and depression experiences narrowed as lockdown continued, but differences remained evident 20 weeks after lockdown started.
“Many of these inequalities in experiences were reduced as lockdown continued, but differences were still evident 20 weeks after the start of lockdown.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“As mental health improved, the difference between these vulnerable groups and people without these risk factors reduced but was still evident 20 weeks after the start of lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome groups, including women, younger adults, and individuals with lower educational attainment, had faster improvements in symptoms, thereby reducing the differences between these vulnerable groups and other groups over time.
“However, some groups, including women, younger adults, and individuals with lower educational attainment, had faster improvements in symptoms, thereby reducing the differences between these vulnerable groups and other groups over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough individuals with mental illness had higher levels of depressive symptoms and anxiety at the start of lockdown, they had the same trajectories over the subsequent weeks.
“Although we found that individuals with mental illness had higher levels of depressive symptoms and anxiety at the start of lockdown (which is echoed in COVID-19 studies33, 34, 35 from various countries), they had the same trajectories over the subsequent weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [33] Newby, 2020, Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, PLoS One source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Asmundson, 2020, Do pre-existing anxiety-related and mood disorders differentially impact COVID-19 stress responses and coping?, J Anxiety Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Xiong, 2020, Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review, J Affective Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPre-existing psychiatric conditions appear to be a risk factor for poorer mental health outcomes, and COVID-19 data have echoed this.
“Similarly, there has been some indication that pre-existing psychiatric conditions are a risk factor for poorer mental health outcomes,22 which has also been echoed by data from the COVID-19 pandemic.16, 17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Jeong, 2016, Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Epidemiol Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Kwong, 2020, Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts, medRxiv
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Solomou, 2020, Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures: age and sex matter, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee and all participants gave written informed consent.
“The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee and all participants gave written informed consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe analytic sample comprised 36,520 participants providing 436,522 observations, with an average of 12 repeated measures per participant (range 3 to 20).
“After excluding participants with less than two follow-ups or with missing values, our analytic sample comprised 36 520 participants, providing 436 522 observations (12 repeated measures per participant on average, ranging from three to 20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBefore the pandemic, women, younger adults, people with less education or lower socioeconomic position, Black, Asian, and minority ethnic individuals, and people living alone were more likely to have higher depression and anxiety than their comparison groups.
“Women, younger adults, individuals with lower educational attainment and socioeconomic position, individuals from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds, and individuals living alone are more likely to experience higher levels of depression and anxiety than men, older adults, individuals with higher educational attainment and socioeconomic position, individuals from white backgrounds”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Ansseau, 2008, Socioeconomic correlates of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in primary care: the GADIS II study (Generalized Anxiety and Depression Impact Survey II), Depress Anxiety source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Hölzel, 2011, Risk factors for chronic depression—a systematic review, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCOVID-19 pandemic data have echoed those findings about risk factors for worse mental health.
“and data about the COVID-19 pandemic have echoed these findings.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [16] Kwong, 2020, Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts, medRxiv
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Solomou, 2020, Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures: age and sex matter, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Pieh, 2020, The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria, J Psychosom Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Pierce, 2020, Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Wang, 2020, Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China, Int J Environ Res Public Health
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Ausín, 2020, Gender-related differences in the psychological impact of confinement as a consequence of COVID-19 in Spain, J Gend Stud
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataLevels of mental health did not continue to worsen in this period, which is slightly at odds with data from previous epidemics where mental health was found to worsen during quarantine.
“The fact that levels of mental health did not continue to worsen in this period is slightly at odds with data from previous epidemics, in which mental health was found to worsen during (or as a result of) quarantine.15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Brooks, 2020, The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence, Lancet source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe UCL COVID-19 Social Study is a panel study weighted to population proportions.
“we analysed data from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study, a panel study weighted to population proportions”
- Also stated in: § Statistical analysis · plain
“To account for the non-random nature of the sample, the sample was weighted by the proportions of gender, age, ethnicity, and education obtained from the Office for National Statistics.26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Weighting the sample by gender, age, ethnicity, and education proportions from the Office for National Statistics adequately corrects for the non-random sample and makes the estimates representative.
- Also stated in: § Statistical analysis · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFear of missing out might also have been reduced because of the global nature of this pandemic, compared with the restricted nature of quarantines in previous pandemics.
“Indeed, fear of missing out (which is associated with depression, distraction, and somatic symptoms28) might also have been reduced because of the global nature of this pandemic, compared with the restricted nature of quarantines in previous pandemics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Baker, 2016, Fear of missing out: relationships with depression, mindfulness, and physical symptoms, Transl Issues Psychol Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe study provides detailed time series data on trajectories of mental health during lockdown.
“However, this study does give detailed time series data on trajectories of mental health during lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The weighted sample, despite non-random recruitment, yields trajectories that are informative about the general population's mental health during lockdown in England.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationDepressive symptoms were measured with the PHQ-9, a standard 9-item instrument for diagnosing depression in primary care.
“Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a standard 9-item instrument for diagnosing depression in primary care,24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Löwe, 2004, Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 remain valid when respondents report symptoms over the past week instead of the past two weeks.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFour thousand participants (10%) who withheld demographic data or preferred not to self-identify on gender and income were excluded from the analysis.
“4000 (10%) of these participants withheld data or preferred not to self-identify on demographic factors including gender and income and were therefore excluded from our analysis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Excluding the 4000 participants who withheld demographic data does not materially bias the analytic sample.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMeasures to safeguard jobs and finances taken in the UK might have helped reduce specific anxieties.
“It is further possible that measures to safeguard jobs and finances taken in the UK might have helped to reduce specific anxieties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies during the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted that women and younger adults had higher levels of anxiety and depression than men and older adults.
“Previous studies during the COVID-19 pandemic have already highlighted that women and younger adults had higher levels of anxiety and depression than men and older adults,4, 17, 18 but our data show that these groups have also had faster improvements in their symptoms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] Pierce, 2020, Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Solomou, 2020, Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures: age and sex matter, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Pieh, 2020, The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria, J Psychosom Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll listed authors are independent from the funders, and final decisions about the research were taken by the investigators without restriction.
“All researchers listed as authors are independent from the funders and all final decisions about the research were taken by the investigators and were unrestricted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe analyses used latent growth models that adjusted for sociodemographic and health covariates.
“Analyses were done using latent growth models, which were fitted to account for sociodemographic and health covariates.”
- Also stated in: § Statistical analysis · plain
“Data were analysed using latent growth modelling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
- Also stated in: § Statistical analysis · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study did not use a random population sample, so reported statistics are not presented as prevalence levels for anxiety or depressive symptoms.
“The study did not use a random population sample, and therefore our reported statistics are not presented as prevalence levels for anxiety or depressive symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationAnxiety was measured with the GAD-7, a validated 7-item tool.
“Anxiety was measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment (GAD-7), a well validated 7-item tool used to screen and diagnose generalised anxiety disorder in clinical practice and research23”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Spitzer, 2006, A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7, Arch Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 remain valid when respondents report symptoms over the past week instead of the past two weeks.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAfter weighting, the sample reflected population proportions: 51% women, 35% with a degree or above, and 14% BAME.
“After weighting, the sample reflected population proportions, with 18 643 (51%) women, 12 670 (35%) participants with a degree or above, and 5311 (14%) participants with BAME ethnicity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe funders had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing.
“The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll authors had full access to all data and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
“All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome sources indicate that mental health worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic before stay-at-home orders were introduced.
“However, some sources suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health deteriorated before the stay-at-home orders (ie, lockdowns) were introduced.10, 11, 12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Layard
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe proliferation of online and home-based leisure activities and extensive use of virtual and digital communication during the COVID-19 pandemic might have helped ease the burden of lockdown.
“Finally, the proliferation of online and home-based leisure activities and the extensive use of virtual and digital communication during the COVID-19 pandemic might have helped to ease the burden of lockdown itself, in contrast to previous epidemics in which the fear of missing out was reported to be a challenge.27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Brooks, 2020, The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence, Lancet source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study involved repeated weekly assessment of mental health, so regression to the mean is a possible source of bias.
“Additionally, this study involved repeated weekly assessment of mental health, so regression to the mean is a possible source of bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOverall, the highest levels of depression and anxiety in England were in the early stages of lockdown but declined fairly rapidly following the introduction of lockdown, with improvements continuing as lockdown easing measures were introduced and then plateauing after the first 4 months.
“Overall, these findings suggest that the highest levels of depression and anxiety in England were in the early stages of lockdown but declined fairly rapidly following the introduction of lockdown, with improvements continuing as lockdown easing measures were introduced and then plateauing after the first 4 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBecause of substantial overlap between participants reporting diagnoses of depression and anxiety, the study did not look at the unique contribution of each condition to trajectories of symptoms across lockdown, or at how specific symptoms might have been affected.
“Because of the substantial overlap between participants reporting diagnoses of depression and diagnoses of anxiety, we did not look at the unique contribution of each condition to trajectories of symptoms across lockdown, or at how specific symptoms (such as thoughts of death) might have been affected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe study followed people from spring to summer in England, so the contribution of seasonality to findings remains to be explored, although the results suggest effects above and beyond usual fluctuations.
“Our study followed people across the period from spring to summer in England so the contribution of seasonality to findings remains to be explored, although the results presented here suggest effects above and beyond usual fluctuations.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Harmatz, 2000, Seasonal variation of depression and other moods: a longitudinal approach, J Biol Rhythms source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIndividuals living with children had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms initially than individuals living with other adults, but a faster rate of improvement, potentially due to growing public awareness that children were less affected by COVID-19.
“However, individuals living with children had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms initially than individuals living with other adults, but a faster rate of improvement, potentially due to the growing public awareness of research suggesting that children were less affected by COVID-19.31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Guan, 2020, Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study asked about symptoms of anxiety and depression over the past week rather than past 2 weeks because reassessments were weekly, which means precise values on the scale cannot be taken as national averages.
“We also asked about symptoms of anxiety and depression over the past week rather than past 2 weeks because our reassessments were weekly. Although this change has precedence both in previous studies and clinical screening, it underlines that the precise values on the scale cannot be taken as national averages for anxiety and depression during the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study did not have sufficient statistical power to look at the experiences of specific ethnic groups, and the analysis did not explore the experiences of individuals with non-binary gender identities.
“As a result, we did not have sufficient statistical power to look at the experiences of specific ethnic groups and our analysis did not explore the experiences of individuals with non-binary gender identities, but we recognise the need for and encourage and support future research on these areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is possible that previous experience of mental illness or social isolation caused by previous mental illness meant individuals had experience of some of the requirements of lockdown or of applying coping strategies in stressful situations.
“It is possible that previous experience of mental illness or social isolation caused by previous mental illness meant individuals had experience of some of the requirements of lockdown or of applying coping strategies in stressful situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIndividuals with lower household income had consistently worse mental health than individuals with higher household income, which has been proposed to be linked to higher experiences of adversities such as job losses, decreases in household income, and challenges to pay bills.
“Similarly, individuals with lower household income had consistently worse mental health than individuals with a higher household income, which has been proposed to be linked to higher experiences of adversities such as job losses, decreases in household income, and challenges to pay bills.3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Wright, 2020, Are we all in this together? Longitudinal assessment of cumulative adversities by socioeconomic position in the first 3 weeks of lockdown in the UK, J Epidemiol Community Health source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAdults living alone had consistently worse levels of depressive symptoms, which could be related to higher levels of loneliness due to social restrictions.
“By contrast, adults living alone had consistently worse levels of depressive symptoms, which could be related to higher levels of loneliness due to social restrictions.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Bu, 2020, Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study relied on participants' self-report of diagnosed mental illness and was unable to confirm diagnoses or identify the specific type of problem.
“Additionally, we relied on participants’ self-report of diagnosed mental illness and were unable to confirm diagnoses, or identify specifically the type of problem with which participants had previously been diagnosed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reported diagnoses of mental illness are accurate enough for grouping.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe models adjusted simultaneously for multiple demographic factors including socioeconomic position, and socioeconomic position was related to poorer psychological experiences.
“But the models adjusted simultaneously for multiple demographic factors including socioeconomic position, and socioeconomic position was related to poorer psychological experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study may not have adequately covered the full range of experiences, so it does not claim to provide data on prevalence of mental illness during the pandemic.
“It is possible that the study did not adequately cover the full range of experiences. Therefore, this study does not claim to provide data on prevalence of mental illness during the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals from ethnic minority groups are disproportionately more likely to be from lower socioeconomic groups, so they might still have been disproportionately affected.
“Individuals from ethnic minority groups are disproportionately more likely to be from lower socioeconomic groups,36 so they might still have been disproportionately affected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Phillips, 2011, Institutional racism and ethnic inequalities: an expanded multilevel framework, J Soc Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIf regression to the mean occurred, it might have been expected to work both ways, with higher scores declining and lower scores increasing, yet all groups showed decreases across the study period.
“However, if regression to the mean occurred, we might have expected it to work both ways, with the higher anxiety and depressive symptom scores declining and the lower scores increasing. Yet all groups showed decreases across the study period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe finding that women and younger adults had faster improvements could indicate a more challenging psychological experience early on in lockdown or a higher initial reactivity to events among these groups.
“This finding could indicate a more challenging psychological experience early on in lockdown (eg, as many women balanced child care and working from home) or a higher initial reactivity to events among these groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe use of binary categories for ethnicity and other variables does not fully capture the experiences of different groups.
“We used some binary categories in our analyses for ethnicity (and for other variables such as gender), but we recognise that such labels do not fully capture the experiences of different groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMany inequalities in mental health experiences, such as inequalities by age and gender, did remain, and emotionally vulnerable groups such as individuals with existing mental health conditions or individuals living alone have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath.
“Nevertheless, many inequalities in mental health experiences (such as inequalities by age and gender) did remain and emotionally vulnerable groups (such as individuals with existing mental health conditions or individuals living alone) have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA decrease in average scores due to non-random attrition is unlikely to have substantially biased results because all participants in the analysis provided at least three datapoints, so their trajectories were estimated even in the absence of complete data.
“Furthermore, a decrease in average scores due to non-random attrition is unlikely to have substantially biased results as all participants in the analysis provided at least three datapoints, so their trajectories were estimated even in the absence of complete data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataEthnic minority groups were under-represented in the data, although weighting was used to increase the proportion of their responses.
“Ethnic minority groups were under-represented in our data (although we did weight to increase the proportion of their responses).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Weighting the sample by gender, age, ethnicity, and education proportions from the Office for National Statistics adequately corrects for the non-random sample and makes the estimates representative.
“To account for the non-random nature of the sample, the sample was weighted by the proportions of gender, age, ethnicity, and education obtained from the Office for National Statistics.26”
The paper relies on this without support.
The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 remain valid when respondents report symptoms over the past week instead of the past two weeks.
“The validated measures of both the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 ask respondents to focus on the past 2 weeks, but because the COVID-19 Social Study involved weekly reassessments, we asked participants to focus just on the past week.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Excluding the 4000 participants who withheld demographic data does not materially bias the analytic sample.
“4000 (10%) of these participants withheld data or preferred not to self-identify on demographic factors including gender and income and were therefore excluded from our analysis”
The paper relies on this without support.
The unspecified latent growth model with free time scores correctly represents the shape of anxiety and depressive symptom trajectories.
“We used unspecified latent growth modelling, which allows the shape of growth trajectories to be determined by data by using free time scores.”
The paper relies on this without support.
During the first lockdown in England, some trips outside the home were permitted, unlike the more restricted quarantines in previous epidemics.
“First, for the majority of people in England during lockdown, some trips outside of the home were permissible, whereas previous studies looked at quarantines in which movement was more restricted, albeit typically for much smaller numbers of people.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There was substantial previous warning in England that a lockdown was likely, given patterns in other European countries.
“Second, there was substantial previous warning in England that a lockdown was likely to happen given patterns in other European countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The weighted sample, despite non-random recruitment, yields trajectories that are informative about the general population's mental health during lockdown in England.
“However, this study does give detailed time series data on trajectories of mental health during lockdown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants' self-reported diagnoses of mental illness are accurate enough for grouping.
“Additionally, we relied on participants’ self-report of diagnosed mental illness and were unable to confirm diagnoses, or identify specifically the type of problem with which participants had previously been diagnosed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A longitudinal survey in England suggests anxiety and depression rise rapidly during early lockdown but decline quickly thereafter.
“A longitudinal survey conducted in England suggests that symptoms of anxiety and depression tend to rise rapidly during the early stages of a lockdown but decline quickly thereafter [65]”
From Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Web-Based and Mobile Interventions for Common Mental Health Problems in Working Adults: Multi-Arm Randomized Pilot Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
The Results report a sharp decline in anxiety and depressive symptoms between weeks 2 and 5 of lockdown, not a rapid rise during its early stages. The Discussion likewise says symptoms declined following the introduction of lockdown. The claim captures the subsequent decline but reverses the paper’s account of the initial trajectory. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost previous studies concluded that a swift increase in mental health problems in the early stages of the pandemic was quickly followed by a similar decline in symptoms of anxiety and depression.
“Most of these studies reported on mental health trajectories during the first few weeks and months following the outbreak, concluding that a swift increase in mental health problems in the early stages of the pandemic was quickly followed by a similar decline in symptoms of anxiety and depression.6”
From Changes in mental health problems and suicidal behaviour in students and their associations with COVID-19-related restrictions in Norway: a national repeated cross-sectional analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that earlier studies found increased psychological distress in the first weeks of lockdown. The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) report a rapid subsequent decline in anxiety and depressive symptoms in this study's England sample. The paper does not establish that most previous studies found that full trajectory, or that the decline was similar in magnitude to the initial increase. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious studies of the general population showed improvements in mental health problems following an initial deterioration at the beginning of the pandemic.
“Our findings differ from previous studies of the general population, which showed improvements in mental health problems following an initial deterioration at the beginning of the pandemic.”
Emerging evidence suggests that young people have experienced the greatest decline in mental health in the first wave of COVID-19, in comparison to people in other age ranges.
“Emerging evidence suggests that young people have experienced the greatest decline in mental health in the first wave of COVID-19, in comparison to people in other age ranges”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Weighted BAME percentage does not match the reported count
MinorThe reported 5311 participants out of 36 520 is 14.54%, which rounds to 15%, not 14%.
Reported 14 · recomputed 14.542716
“After weighting, the sample reflected population proportions, with 18 643 (51%) women, 12 670 (35%) participants with a degree or above, and 5311 (14%) participants with BAME ethnicity.”
Living alone is inconsistently described as an anxiety risk factor
MinorThe abstract says living alone was associated with higher anxiety at the start of lockdown, but the results say anxiety was similar for people living alone and those living with other adults without children.
“Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown.”
“whereas individuals living alone had higher levels of depressive symptoms but similar levels of anxiety to people living with other adults but without children.”
Cites
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765 · see citing works
Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China
Guan, W.-J., Ni, Z.-Y., Hu, Y., Liang, W.-H., Ou, C.-Q., He, J.-X., Liu, L., Shan, H., Lei, C.-L., Hui, D. S. C., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2002032 · Cited by 30,246 · see citing works
The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3532534 · Cited by 16,394 · see citing works
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378 · see citing works
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729 · Cited by 9,923 · see citing works
The PHQ-9: A New Depression Diagnostic and Severity Measure
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06 · Cited by 5,898 · see citing works
Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Ballard, C., Christensen, H., Cohen Silver, R., Everall, I., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30168-1 · Cited by 5,715 · see citing works
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review
Xiong, J., Lipsitz, O., Nasri, F., Lui, L. M. W., Gill, H., Phan, L., Chen-Li, D., Iacobucci, M., Ho, R., Majeed, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001 · Cited by 5,204 · see citing works
Löwe, B., Decker, O., Müller, S., Brähler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318160d093 · Cited by 4,527 · see citing works
Pierce, M., Hope, H., Ford, T., Hatch, S., Hotopf, M., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R., Wessely, S., McManus, S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30308-4 · Cited by 2,621 · see citing works
SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada
Hawryluck, L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea, S., & Styra, R. (2004) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1007.030703 · Cited by 1,929 · see citing works
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on
Marmot, M. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m693 · Cited by 1,834 · see citing works
Löwe, B., Kroenke, K., Herzog, W., & Gräfe, K. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(03)00198-8 · Cited by 1,558 · see citing works
Pieh, C., Budimir, S., & Probst, T. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110186 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
Jeong, H., Yim, H. W., Song, Y.-J., Ki, M., Min, J.-A., Cho, J., & Chae, J.-H. (2016) · Epidemiology and Health · doi:10.4178/epih.e2016048 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience
REYNOLDS, D. L., GARAY, J. R., DEAMOND, S. L., MORAN, M. K., GOLD, W., & STYRA, R. (2008) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268807009156 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Liu, X., Kakade, M., Fuller, C. J., Fan, B., Fang, Y., Kong, J., Guan, Z., & Wu, P. (2012) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.02.003 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Huckins, J. F., daSilva, A. W., Wang, W., Hedlund, E., Rogers, C., Nepal, S. K., Wu, J., Obuchi, M., Murphy, E. I., Meyer, M. L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20185 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Bu, F., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. (2020) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Self-citationShanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Murray, A. L., Nivette, A., Hepp, U., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329172000241x · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Solomou, I., & Constantinidou, F. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17144924 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts
Kwong, A. S. F., Pearson, R. M., Adams, M. J., Northstone, K., Tilling, K. M., Major‐Smith, D., Fawns‐Ritchie, C., Bould, H., Warne, N., Zammit, S., et al. (2020) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2020.242 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Shanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Murray, A. L., Nivette, A. E., Hepp, U., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2020) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.17863/cam.57251 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Newby, J. M., O’Moore, K., Tang, S., Christensen, H., & Faasse, K. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236562 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Asmundson, G. J. G., Paluszek, M. M., Landry, C. A., Rachor, G. S., McKay, D., & Taylor, S. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102271 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Fear of missing out: relationships with depression, mindfulness, and physical symptoms
Baker, Z. G., Krieger, H., & LeRoy, A. S. (2016) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000075 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Predictive factors of psychological disorder development during recovery following SARS outbreak
Mihashi, M., Otsubo, Y., Yinjuan, X., Nagatomi, K., Hoshiko, M., & Ishitake, T. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013674 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Risk factors for chronic depression—a systematic review
Hölzel, L., Härter, M., Reese, C., & Kriston, L. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.03.025 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Institutional racism and ethnic inequalities: an expanded multilevel framework
PHILLIPS, C. (2011) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279410000565 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Ausín, B., González-Sanguino, C., Castellanos, M. A., & Muñoz, M. (2020) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2020.1799768 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Seasonal variation of depression and other moods: a longitudinal approach
Harmatz, M. G., Well, A. D., Overtree, C. E., Kawamura, K. Y., Rosal, M., & Ockene, I. S. (2000) · Journal of Biological Rhythms · doi:10.1177/074873000129001350 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Wright, L., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. (2020) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2020-214475 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyond the dichotomy: incarceration dosage and mental health
Porter, L. C., & DeMarco, L. M. (2019) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12199 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Ansseau, M., Fischler, B., Dierick, M., Albert, A., Leyman, S., & Mignon, A. (2008) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20306 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Covid-19: Mental health consequences of pandemic need urgent research, paper advises
Mahase, E. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m1515 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
When to Release the Lockdown? A Wellbeing Framework for Analysing Costs and BenefitsPreprint
Layard, R., Clark, A. E., Jan-emmanuel De Neve, A., Krekel, C., Fancourt, D. E., Hey, N., & O’Donnell, G. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3590884 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationMental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohortsPreprint
Kwong, A. S. F., Pearson, R. M., Adams, M. J., et al. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.06.16.20133116 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aknin, L. B., De Neve, J.-E., Dunn, E. W., Fancourt, D. E., Goldberg, E., Helliwell, J. F., Jones, S. P., Karam, E., Layard, R., Lyubomirsky, S., et al. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211029964 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Self-citationPierce, M., McManus, S., Hope, H., Hotopf, M., Ford, T., Hatch, S. L., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R. T., Wessely, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00151-6 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Czeisler, M. É., Lane, R. I., Wiley, J. F., Czeisler, C. A., Howard, M. E., & Rajaratnam, S. M. W. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37665 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Nobari, H., Fashi, M., Eskandari, A., Villafaina, S., Murillo-Garcia, Á., & Pérez-Gómez, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18094563 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study
Fountoulakis, K. N., Karakatsoulis, G., Abraham, S., Adorjan, K., Ahmed, H. U., Alarcón, R. D., Arai, K., Auwal, S. S., Berk, M., Bjedov, S., et al. (2022) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.004 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
McKinlay, A. R., Fancourt, D., & Burton, A. (2021) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02367-8 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationMcKinlay, A. R., May, T., Dawes, J., Fancourt, D., & Burton, A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053676 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationBu, F., Bone, J. K., Mitchell, J. J., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97065-1 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationUncovering survivorship bias in longitudinal mental health surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic
Czeisler, M. É., Wiley, J. F., Czeisler, C. A., Rajaratnam, S. M. W., & Howard, M. E. (2021) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s204579602100038x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Dewa, L. H., Crandell, C., Choong, E., Jaques, J., Bottle, A., Kilkenny, C., Lawrence-Jones, A., Di Simplicio, M., Nicholls, D., & Aylin, P. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.009 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Crocetti, E., Tossani, E., & Grandi, S. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.067 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Benke, C., Autenrieth, L. K., Asselmann, E., & Pané-Farré, C. A. (2023) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-022-01400-0 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Meaklim, H., Saunders, W. J., Byrne, M. L., Junge, M. F., Varma, P., Finck, W. A., & Jackson, M. L. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.021 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Sivertsen, B., Knapstad, M., Petrie, K., O’Connor, R., Lønning, K. J., & Hysing, M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057492 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Students may be particularly vulnerable to social restrictions and social isolation, 6 as they often live alone and are more likely to be single.”
BackgroundJohn, A., Lee, S. C., Solomon, S., Crepaz-Keay, D., McDaid, S., Morton, A., Davidson, G., Van Bortel, T., & Kousoulis, A. A. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048123 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Bundy, R., Mandy, W., Crane, L., Belcher, H., Bourne, L., Brede, J., Hull, L., Brinkert, J., & Cook, J. (2022) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211065543 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Alzueta, E., Podhajsky, S., Zhao, Q., Tapert, S. F., Thompson, W. K., de Zambotti, M., Yuksel, D., Kiss, O., Wang, R., Volpe, L., et al. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721004062 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Stress-related emotional and behavioural impact following the first COVID-19 outbreak peak
Benjamin, A., Kuperman, Y., Eren, N., Rotkopf, R., Amitai, M., Rossman, H., Shilo, S., Meir, T., Keshet, A., Nuttman-Shwartz, O., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01219-6 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Johns, G., Waddington, L., & Samuel, V. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.024 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Narendra Kumar, M. K., Francis, B., Hashim, A. H., Zainal, N. Z., Abdul Rashid, R., Ng, C. G., Danaee, M., Hussain, N., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10030532 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Economides, M., Bolton, H., Male, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/34032 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“A longitudinal survey conducted in England suggests that symptoms of anxiety and depression tend to rise rapidly during the early stages of a lockdown but decline quickly thereafter [65], which may partly explain the changes in mental health scores reported by the control group.”
Daimer, S., Mihatsch, L. L., Neufeld, S. A., Murray, G. K., & Knolle, F. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75893 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Godara, M., Rademacher, J., Hecht, M., Silveira, S., Voelkle, M. C., & Singer, T. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11091305 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…as mentioned previously, some other studies have linked these disparities to increased childcare burden, decreased social interaction with peers, and decreased job or financial security [78,79], a further detailed examination is necessary to provide a more nuanced view of the mechanistic processes.”
BackgroundA qualitative study of autistic adults’ quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns
Stewart, G. R., Leoni, M., Charlton, R. A., Pickard, H. R., & Happé, F. (2023) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2022.0035 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fancourt, D., Steptoe, A., & Bu, F.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fancourt, Daisy
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-149
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7820109
- OpenAlex
- W3112159824
- Cited by
- 1,161
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 224 · 2022: 325 · 2021: 306 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 86.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swansea University
- UK Research and Innovation (ES/S002588/1)
- University College London
- Wellcome Trust (205407/Z/16/Z, 221400/Z/20/Z)
- Cardiff University
- Nuffield Foundation (WEL/FR-000022583)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, anxiety, depressive symptoms, mental health, growth trajectories, social isolation, socioeconomic disparities, risk factors, lockdown easing, England, adults, living alone, educational attainment, income, pre-existing mental health conditions, sex differences, age differences, living with children, latent growth curve models, generalized anxiety disorder
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, Physical Distancing, COVID-19, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, England, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Risk, Time Factors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review