Cited by 71Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Coping flexibility and complicated grief: A comparison of American and Chinese samples

Open access
Burton, Charles L., Yan, Oscar H., Pat-Horenczyk, Ruth, Chan, Ide S.F., Ho, Samuel, Bonanno, George A.·2012·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to process a death and the ability to remain optimistic and look beyond the loss are both thought to be effective means of coping with loss and other aversive events. Recently, these seemingly contrary dimensions have been integrated into the idea of coping flexibility. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the ability of married and bereaved individuals in the United States and Hong Kong to use both coping approaches as operationalized by the trauma-focused and forward-focused coping scales of a previously validated questionnaire. We also calculated a single flexibility score. RESULTS: Bereaved participants reported greater trauma-focused coping ability than did married participants. However, bereaved participants meeting criteria for complicated grief (CG) reported less forward-focused coping than both asymptomatic bereaved and married participants. The CG group also showed less overall coping flexibility than the asymptomatic bereaved and married groups. Country was not a factor. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that deficits in coping flexibility are indicative of pathology in bereaved individuals, and that this relationship extends across cultures. Limitations of the study and directions for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20888

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burton et al. (2011) showed that bereaved people with complicated grief report coping less with restoration-oriented stressors, and show less coping flexibility than bereaved people without complicated grief and nonbereaved married participants.

    “A comparative study by Burton et al. (2011) showed that bereaved people with CG report coping less with restorationoriented stressors, and show less coping flexibility than bereaved people without CG and nonbereaved married participants.”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Burton et al. (2011)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Cheng C Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach J Pers Soc Psychol 2001 80 814 833 11374752
  2. [40]Bonanno GA Kaltman S Toward an Integrative perspective on bereavement Psychol Bull 1999 125 6 760 776 10589301

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burton, C. L., Yan, O. H., Pat-Horenczyk, R., Chan, I. S. F., Ho, S., & Bonanno, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Israel Center for the Treatment of Psychotrauma; Herzog Hospital; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Jerusalem; Israel
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Burton, Charles L.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2011-09-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
16-22
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1893811132
Cited by
71
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073595)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
coping flexibility, complicated grief, bereavement, optimism, cross-cultural comparison, Hong Kong, spouses
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Bereavement, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Death, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, United States, Widowhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review