Cited by 45Treatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and TreatmentElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Developing biomarkers in mood disorders research through the use of rapid-acting antidepressants

Open access
Niciu, Mark J., Mathews, Daniel C., Nugent, Allison C., Ionescu, Dawn F., Furey, Maura L., Richards, Erica M., Machado-Vieira, Rodrigo, Zarate, Carlos A.·2014·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

An impediment to progress in mood disorders research is the lack of analytically valid and qualified diagnostic and treatment biomarkers. Consistent with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)'s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, the lack of diagnostic biomarkers has precluded us from moving away from a purely subjective (symptom-based) toward a more objective diagnostic system. In addition, treatment response biomarkers in mood disorders would facilitate drug development and move beyond trial-and-error toward more personalized treatments. As such, biomarkers identified early in the pathophysiological process are proximal biomarkers (target engagement), while those occurring later in the disease process are distal (disease pathway components). One strategy to achieve this goal in biomarker development is to increase efforts at the initial phases of biomarker development (i.e. exploration and validation) at single sites with the capability of integrating multimodal approaches across a biological systems level. Subsequently, resultant putative biomarkers could then undergo characterization and surrogacy as these latter phases require multisite collaborative efforts. We have used multimodal approaches - genetics, proteomics/metabolomics, peripheral measures, multimodal neuroimaging, neuropsychopharmacological challenge paradigms and clinical predictors - to explore potential predictor and mediator/moderator biomarkers of the rapid-acting antidepressants ketamine and scopolamine. These exploratory biomarkers may then be used for a priori stratification in larger multisite controlled studies during the validation and characterization phases with the ultimate goal of surrogacy. In sum, the combination of target engagement and well-qualified disease-related measures are crucial to improve our pathophysiological understanding, personalize treatment selection, and expand our armamentarium of novel therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22224

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such an approach has the potential to further our understanding of both mechanisms of action for suicide-focused treatments as well as elucidate the neural correlates of suicide risk.

    “Such an approach, which has already been implemented in rapid-acting clinical trials for depression (18), has the potential to further our understanding of both mechanisms of action for suicide-focused treatments as well as elucidate the neural correlates of suicide risk (19).”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [51]Li N Lee B Liu RJ mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists Science 2010 329 5994 959 64 20724638 PMC3116441

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niciu, M. J., Mathews, D. C., Nugent, A. C., Ionescu, D. F., Furey, M. L., Richards, E. M., Machado-Vieira, R., & Zarate, C. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Lundbeck (United States) (US)
  • Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health, and Department of Health and Human Services; Bethesda Maryland
Corresponding author
Zarate, Carlos A.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2013-12-18
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
297-307
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1605478008
Cited by
45
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002927)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
mood disorders, biomarkers, rapid-acting antidepressants, ketamine, scopolamine, treatment response biomarkers, diagnostic biomarkers, Research Domain Criteria, personalized treatment, proteomics, metabolomics, neuroimaging, genetic predictors, surrogate markers, depression
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Antidepressive Agents, Humans, Ketamine, Research Design, Scopolamine, Biomarkers, Cholinergic Antagonists, Mood Disorders, Genomics, Metabolomics, Neuroimaging, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review