Cited by 60Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Attachment Style Moderates the Effects of Oxytocin on Social Behaviors and Cognitions During Social Rejection: Applying a Research Domain Criteria Framework to Social Anxiety

Open access
Fang, Angela, Hoge, Elizabeth A., Heinrichs, Markus, Hofmann, Stefan G.·2014·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Whereas the DSM categorizes individuals with similar self-reported symptoms, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) offers a new approach for classifying mental disorders based on dimensions of observable behaviors and neurobiological measures. The objective of this proof-of-concept study is to adopt this approach by distinguishing individuals based on disorder-related personality traits during an experimental manipulation that targeted a disorder-related biological mechanism. Specifically, we examined whether attachment style moderated the effect of oxytocin administration on social behaviors and cognitions during a social exclusion test in individuals with social anxiety disorder. When receiving oxytocin compared to placebo, only individuals with low attachment avoidance displayed more social affiliation and cooperation, and only those with high attachment avoidance showed faster detection of disgust and neutral faces. Thus, attachment style moderated oxytocin's effects among individuals who shared the same DSM diagnosis. We conclude that neurobiological tests can inform new classification strategies by adopting an RDoC framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702614527948

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have reported several confounding factors such as individual differences in anxiety and attachment security that can influence the effects of oxytocin on social-emotional processing.

    “Previous studies have reported several confounding factors such as individual differences in anxiety and attachment security that can influence the effects of oxytocin on social-emotional processing (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2011;Fang et al., 2014;Olff et al., 2013).”
  • Factors such as attachment style and experience of early parental care have been found to moderate the effects of oxytocin; those scoring low on attachment avoidance and harsh parenting showed greater oxytocin-induced increase in social cooperation and positive response to crying infants.

    “Factors such as attachment style and experience of early parental care have been found to moderate the effects of oxytocin; those scoring low on attachment avoidance and harsh parenting showed greater oxytocin-induced increase in social cooperation and positive response to crying infants (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2011;Fang et al., 2014;Olff et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Boyce P Parker G Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1989 23 341 351 2803146

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, A., Hoge, E. A., Heinrichs, M., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
740-747
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2312886145
Cited by
60
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH078308)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
attachment styles, attachment avoidance, oxytocin, social rejection, social exclusion, social anxiety disorder, social affiliation, cooperation, face perception, Research Domain Criteria, personality traits, social cognition, moderation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review