Cited by 61Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionSport Psychology and Performance

Acceptance and Commitment Training in the workplace

Moran, Daniel J·2015·Current Opinion in Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.031

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moran, D. J.
Corresponding author
Moran, Daniel J
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
2
Pages
26-31
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013593998
Cited by
61
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
acceptance and commitment training, acceptance and commitment therapy, workplace interventions, psychological flexibility, occupational stress, employee performance, mindfulness, acceptance, defusion, perspective taking, values clarification, committed action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review