Cited by 44Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Task engagement after mortality salience: The effects of creativity, conformity and connectedness on worldview defence

Routledge, Clay, Arndt, Jamie, Sheldon, Kennon M.·2004·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Abstract Terror management research has shown that activating thoughts about mortality (mortality salience) increases defence of one's worldview. This study investigated how worldview defence is affected by engaging in a task that fosters creativity, conformity, or sharing values after being reminded of death. After writing about death or a control topic, participants were randomly assigned to design a t‐shirt with the goal of being as creative as possible, trying to please others but not oneself, or trying to connect with others via shared values. After mortality salience, conforming to others led to increased worldview defence whereas sharing values did not. Further, engaging in a creative task decreased worldview defence after mortality salience. Implications for understanding the interface between different forms of social connectedness, creativity and the management of existential fears are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.209

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When in a creative mind-set, MS enhanced social, intellectual, and environmental exploration, as well as the exploration of alternative secular and religious cultural worldviews.

    “Specifically, when in a creative mind-set, MS enhanced social, intellectual, and environmental exploration, as well as the exploration of alternative secular and religious cultural worldviews.”

    From When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management (2012) · cites this paper as Routledge, Arndt, & Sheldon, 2004

  • When in a creative mindset, mortality salience enhanced social, intellectual, and environmental exploration, as well as the exploration of alternative secular and religious cultural worldviews.

    “Specifically, when in a creative mindset, MS enhanced social, intellectual, and environmental exploration, as well as the exploration of alternative secular and religious cultural worldviews [106,107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Routledge, C., Arndt, J., & Sheldon, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Routledge, Clay
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
477-487
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2056671632
Cited by
44
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
mortality salience, terror management theory, creativity, conformity, social connectedness, shared values, existential fear, death awareness, task engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review