Cited by 29Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyReligion and Society Interactions

Fitting in with the flock: Social attractiveness as a mechanism for well‐being in religious groups

Hayward, R. David, Elliott, Marta·2009·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

For most people, religion is practiced and experienced within a social group of believers who interact regularly. Yet the role of social psychological intergroup processes has largely been ignored with respect to religious phenomena. The present study explores social attraction as a mechanism by which religious groups affect the psychological well‐being of their members. Data were taken from a large survey of the members of 411 religious congregations in the United States. Linear mixed modeling analyses were conducted predicting two aspects of well‐being in the religious context from a range of variables at the levels of the individual, of the group, and of individual–group fit. Fit measures between individual characteristics and norms within congregations were found to be significant predictors of well‐being for a variety of measures across domains of demographics, religious beliefs, religious behavior, and group integration. These results support the view that the intragroup process of social attraction is a mechanism by which people obtain some benefits from belonging to religious groups. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.552

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aspects of social support specific to religion appear to be qualitatively different than non-religious social support and may have more potent effects on health.

    “Aspects of social support specific to religion appear to be qualitatively different than non-religious social support (Krause, 2008), and may have more potent effects on health (Hayward & Elliott, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayward, R. D., & Elliott, M.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Hayward, R. David
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-13
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
592-607
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2051760106
Cited by
29
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
social attraction, religious congregations, religious groups, psychological well-being, group norms, social belonging, intergroup processes, religious behavior, religious beliefs, group integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review