Cited by 41Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion and Society Interactions

Socioeconomic Differences in the Effects of Prayer on Physical Symptoms and Quality of Life

Banthia, Rajni, Moskowitz, Judith Tedlie, Acree, Michael, Folkman, Susan·2007·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

The extent to which religiosity is related to well-being may differ as a function of race/ethnicity, education or income. We asked 155 caregivers to complete measures of religiosity, prayer, physical symptoms and quality of life. Lower education and, to a lesser extent, lower income were correlated with religiosity and prayer. There were few direct relationships of religiosity and prayer with quality of life and health symptoms. However, the relationships became significant when education and, to a lesser degree, income were taken into account. Prayer was associated with fewer health symptoms and better quality of life among less educated caregivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105307074251

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study of maternal caregivers of chronically ill children found few relations of religious salience and prayer with quality of life and health symptoms, but taking education and income into account, prayer was associated with fewer health symptoms and better quality of life among less educated maternal care-givers, and unrelated in those with more education.

    “A study of maternal caregivers of chronically ill children found few relations of religious salience and prayer with quality of life and health symptoms (Banthia et al., 2007). However, taking education and income into account, the relationships became statistically significant, such that prayer was associated with fewer health symptoms and better quality of life among less educated maternal care”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banthia, R., Moskowitz, J. T., Acree, M., & Folkman, S.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Moskowitz, Judith Tedlie
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2007-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
249-260
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W2043097894
Cited by
41
References
64
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh058069-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH58069)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 01271, M01RR001271)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
prayer, religiosity, socioeconomic status, income, caregivers, somatic symptoms, quality of life, health and well-being, race and ethnicity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Educational Status, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Socioeconomic Factors, Sociology, Medical, United States, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review