Cited by 81Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Ablation of reactive astrocytes exacerbates disease pathology in a model of Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Katsouri, Loukia, Birch, Amy M., Renziehausen, Alexander W. J., Zach, Carolin, Aman, Yahyah, Steeds, Hannah, Bonsu, Angela, Palmer, Emily O. C. +3 more·2020·Glia

Abstract

The role of astrocytes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains poorly understood. We assessed the consequences of ablating astrocytic proliferation in 9 months old double transgenic APP23/GFAP‐TK mice. Treatment of these mice with the antiviral agent ganciclovir conditionally ablates proliferating reactive astrocytes. The loss of proliferating astrocytes resulted in significantly increased levels of monomeric amyloid‐β (Aβ) in brain homogenates, associated with reduced enzymatic degradation and clearance mechanisms. In addition, our data revealed exacerbated memory deficits in mice lacking proliferating astrocytes concomitant with decreased levels of synaptic markers and higher expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Our data suggest that loss of reactive astrocytes in AD aggravates amyloid pathology and memory loss, possibly via disruption of amyloid clearance and enhanced neuroinflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.23759

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katsouri, L., Birch, A. M., Renziehausen, A. W. J., Zach, C., Aman, Y., Steeds, H., Bonsu, A., Palmer, E. O. C., Mirzaei, N., Ries, M., & Sastre, M.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Sastre, Magdalena
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
1017-1030
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W2993940957
Cited by
81
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Alzheimer's Research Trust (ART‐PG2011‐12, ART‐PPG2009B‐10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
reactive astrocytes, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, amyloid clearance, ganciclovir, memory impairment, neuroinflammation, inflammatory cytokines, synaptic markers, astrocyte proliferation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Astrocytes, Disease Models, Animal, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Inflammation, Memory, Short-Term, Mice, Transgenic, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Disease Progression, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review