Cited by 579Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Microglia-Astrocyte Crosstalk: An Intimate Molecular Conversation

Jha, Mithilesh Kumar, Jo, Myungjin, Kim, Jae-Hong, Suk, Kyoungho·2019·The Neuroscientist

Abstract

Microglia-astrocyte crosstalk has recently been at the forefront of glial research. Emerging evidence illustrates that microglia- and astrocyte-derived signals are the functional determinants for the fates of astrocytes and microglia, respectively. By releasing diverse signaling molecules, both microglia and astrocytes establish autocrine feedback and their bidirectional conversation for a tight reciprocal modulation during central nervous system (CNS) insult or injury. Microglia, the constant sensors of changes in the CNS microenvironment and restorers of tissue homeostasis, not only serve as the primary immune cells of the CNS but also regulate the innate immune functions of astrocytes. Similarly, microglia determine the functions of reactive astrocytes, ranging from neuroprotective to neurotoxic. Conversely, astrocytes through their secreted molecules regulate microglial phenotypes and functions ranging from motility to phagocytosis. Altogether, the microglia-astrocyte crosstalk is fundamental to neuronal functions and dysfunctions. This review discusses the current understanding of the intimate molecular conversation between microglia and astrocytes and outlines its potential implications in CNS health and disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073858418783959

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jha, M. K., Jo, M., Kim, J.-H., & Suk, K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Kyungpook National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Suk, Kyoungho
Venue
The Neuroscientist
Published
2018-06-22
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
227-240
ISSN
  • 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4098
OpenAlex
W2808916408
Cited by
579
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (2015R1A2A1A10051958, 2016M3C7A1904148, NRF-2017R1A5A2015391)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
microglia, astrocytes, glial communication, reactive astrocytes, microglial phagocytosis, microglial motility, neuroinflammation, central nervous system injury, neuroprotection, neurotoxicity, autocrine signaling, innate immunity
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Cell Communication, Cell Movement, Encephalitis, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Phagocytosis, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review