Cited by 45Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Dopaminergic system and dream recall: an MRI study in Parkinson's disease patients

Open access
De Gennaro, Luigi, Lanteri, Olimpia, Piras, Fabrizio, Scarpelli, Serena, Assogna, Francesca, Ferrara, Michele, Caltagirone, Carlo, Spalletta, Gianfranco·2016·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

We investigated the role of the dopamine system [i.e., subcortical-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) network] in dreaming, by studying patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) as a model of altered dopaminergic transmission. Subcortical volumes and cortical thickness were extracted by 3T-MR images of 27 PD patients and 27 age-matched controls, who were asked to fill out a dream diary upon morning awakening for one week. PD patients do not substantially differ from healthy controls with respect to the sleep, dream, and neuroanatomical measures. Multivariate correlational analyses in PD patients show that dopamine agonist dosage is associated to qualitatively impoverished dreams, as expressed by lower bizarreness and lower emotional load values. Visual vividness (VV) of their dream reports positively correlates with volumes of both the amygdalae and with thickness of the left mPFC. Emotional load also positively correlates with hippocampal volume. Beside the replication of our previous finding on the role of subcortical nuclei in dreaming experience of healthy subjects, this represents the first evidence of a specific role of the amygdala-mPFC dopaminergic network system in dream recall. The association in PD patients between higher dopamine agonist dosages and impoverished dream reports, however, and the significant correlations between VV and mesolimbic regions, however, provide an empirical support to the hypothesis that a dopamine network plays a key role in dream generation. The causal relation is however precluded by the intrinsic limitation of assuming the dopamine agonist dosage as a measure of the hypodopaminergic state in PD. Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23095

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many afferent and efferent fibers of the posterior and anterior dream systems are connected with the limbic system.

    “many of the afferent and efferent fibers of these two systems are connected with the limbic system”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as De Gennaro et al., 2016

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the medial prefrontal cortex connects directly and indirectly to the hippocampus and amygdala, supporting a connection for one of the discussed systems. The Discussion (page unavailable) distinguishes the posterior temporoparietal system from the mesolimbic system, but does not say that afferent and efferent fibers of both systems connect with the limbic system. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ventromesial frontal white matter takes part in the interplay between basal forebrain and limbic structures.

    “the ventromesial frontal white matter seems to take a part in the interplay between basal forebrain and limbic structures”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as De Gennaro et al., 2016

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes connections between the medial prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus and amygdala. The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies dopaminergic projections in ventromedial frontal white matter and separately discusses basal-forebrain lesions, but does not establish that this white matter mediates an interplay between the basal forebrain and limbic structures. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent findings on Parkinson's Disease confirmed an essential interplay between the mPFC and mesolimbic-dopamine system for dreaming.

    “the recent findings on PD confirmed the evidence of an essential interplay between the mPFC and mesolimbic-dopamine system for dreaming”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as De Gennaro et al., 2016

    The Abstract and Discussion report associations between dream-report features, mPFC thickness, amygdala volume, and dopamine agonist dosage in patients with Parkinson’s disease. The authors call this empirical support for a dopamine network’s role in dreaming, but say a causal relation cannot be established. The claim’s language of a confirmed, essential interplay overstates that evidence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to the paralimbic hypothesis, emotional salience of dream imagery is due to the activation of the paralimbic cortices by the amygdala, while bizarreness of dream contents is a consequence of prefrontal deactivation, reducing the higher order control on amygdalar and hippocampal functioning.

    “According to this hypothesis, emotional salience of dream imagery is due to the activation of the paralimbic cortices by the amygdala,87,88 while bizarreness of dream contents is a consequence of prefrontal deactivation, reducing the higher order control on the amygdalar and hippocampal functioning.110”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lower bizarreness and lower emotional load have been found in Parkinson's disease patients with a hypodopaminergic state.

    “At the same time, lower bizarreness and lower emotional load has been found in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with a hypodopaminergic state.”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000): Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed Washington, DC: Task Force. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pace‐Schott EF (2007): The frontal lobes and dreaming In: Barrett D, McNamara P, editors. The New Science of Dreaming. Westport, CT: Praeger, Greenwood Press; p 115–154. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pont‐Sunyer C, Hotter A, Gaig C, Seppi K, Compta Y, Katzenschlager R, Mas N, Hofeneder D, Brücke T, Bayés A, Wenzel K, Infante J, Zach H, Pirker W, Posada IJ, Alvarez R, Ispierto L, De Fàbregues O, Callén A, Palasi A, Aguilar M, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, Salamero M, Poewe W Tolosa E (2015): The Onset of Nonmotor Symptoms in Parkinson's disease (The ONSET PD Study). Mov Disord 30:229–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD (1997): Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustments methods in clinical trials. Stat Med 16:2529–2542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Gennaro, L., Lanteri, O., Piras, F., Scarpelli, S., Assogna, F., Ferrara, M., Caltagirone, C., & Spalletta, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology University of Rome “Sapienza,” Rome Italy
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Centro Ricerche Enrico Fermi (IT)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences University of L'aquila Italy
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-24
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
1136-1147
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2198267268
Cited by
45
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Funders
Luigi De Gennaro from Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health) (RF-2009-1528677)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dream recall, dopaminergic system, Parkinson's disease, dopamine agonists, medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, dream vividness, dream bizarreness, mesolimbic system, subcortical volume, cortical thickness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antiparkinson Agents, Brain, Dreams, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Organ Size, Parkinson Disease, Mental Recall, Sleep, Dopamine Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review