Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Topographically specific hippocampal projections target functionally distinct prefrontal areas in the rhesus monkey

Barbas, Helen, Blatt, Gene J.·1995·Hippocampus

Abstract

The sources of ipsilateral projections from the hippocampal formation, the presubiculum, area 29a‐c, and parasubiculum to medial, orbital, and lateral prefrontal cortices were studied with retrograde tracers in 27 rhesus monkeys. Labeled neurons within the hippocampal formation (CA1, CA1′, prosubiculum, and subiculum) were found rostrally, although some were noted throughout the entire rostrocaudal extent of the hippocampal formation. Most labeled neurons in the hippocampal formation projected to medial prefrontal cortices, followed by orbital areas. In addition, there were differences in the topography of afferent neurons projecting to medial when compared with orbital cortices. Labeled neurons innervating medial cortices were found mainly in the CA1′ and CA1 fields rostrally, but originated in the subicular fields caudally. In contrast, labeled neurons which innervated orbital cortices were considerably more focal, emanating from the same relative position within a field throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the hippocampal formation. In marked contrast to the pattern of projection to medial and orbital prefrontal cortices, lateral prefrontal areas received projections from only a few labeled neurons found mostly in the subicular fields. Lateral prefrontal cortices, lateral prefrontal cortices received the most robust projections from the presubiculum and the supracallosal area 29a‐c. Orbital, and to a lesser extent medial, prefrontal areas received projections from a smaller but significant number of neurons from the presubiculum and area 29a‐c. Only a few labeled neurons were found in the parasubiculum, and most projected to medial prefrontal areas. The results suggest that functionally distinct prefrontal cortices receive projections from different components of the hippocampal region. Medial and orbital prefrontal cortices may have a role in long‐term mnemonic process similar to those associated with the hippocampal formation with which they are linked. Moreover, the preponderance of projection neurons from the hippocampal formation innervating medial when compared with orbital prefrontal areas followed the opposite trend from what we had observed previously for the amygdala (Barbas and De Olmos [1990]) (J Comp Neurol 301:1–23). Thus, the hippocampal formation, associated with mnemonic processes, targets predominantly medial prefrontal cortices, whereas the amygdala, associated with emotional aspects of memory, issues robust projections to orbital limbic cortices. Lateral prefrontal cortices receive robust projections from the presubiculum and area 29a‐c and sparse projections from the hippocampal formation. These findings are consistent with the idea that the role of lateral prefrontal cortices in memory is distinct from that of either medial or orbital cortices. The results suggest that signals from functionally distinct limbic structures to some extent follow parallel pathways to functionally distinct prefrontal cortices. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.450050604

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90037-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1212/WNL.34.6.752 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/B978-0-12-547625-6.50024-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03796.1995 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Amaral DG, 1987, Handbook of physiology—the nervous system V, 211
  6. 10.1016/B978-0-12-547625-6.50026-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/cne.902770103 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90225-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/cne.902250304 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/cne.902520310 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/cne.902760302 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Barbas H, 1992, Advances in neurology, 91
  13. 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90132-Y · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0149-7634(94)00053-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/cercor/5.2.158 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90064-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/BF00240516 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/cne.902560203 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/cne.902860306 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/h0087996 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Beason‐HeldLL(1994)Contributions of the hippocampus and related ventromedial temporal cortices to memory in the rhesus monkey Ph. D. Thesis Boston University School of Medicine Boston.
  22. Blatt GJ, 1988, Organization of hippocampal efferent projections to the cerebral cortex in the rhesus monkey, Neurosci Abstr, 14, 859
  23. Brodmann K, 1909, Vergleichende Lokalizationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestelt auf Grund der Zellenbaues
  24. Cavada C, 1988, Connections of the prefrontal cortex with the hippocampal formation in the cat and macaque monkey, Neurosci Abstr, 14, 858
  25. 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90769-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1161/01.STR.8.2.272 · DOI
  27. 10.1212/WNL.34.5.679 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Damasio AR, 1994, Descarte's error: emotion, reason, and the human brain
  29. DeJong RN, 1968, “Pure” memory loss with hippocampal lesions: a case report, Trans Am Neurol Assoc, 93, 31
  30. 10.1002/cne.903440403 · DOI
  31. 10.1152/jn.1973.36.1.61 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Fuster JM, 1989, The prefrontal cortex
  33. Fuster JM, 1990, Handbook of physiology—the nervous system II, 1149
  34. 10.1016/0959-4388(93)90204-C · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90689-4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1080/01616412.1979.11739553 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/BF00325634 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.001033 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90166-0 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90088-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90613-8 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Jacobsen CF, 1936, Studies of cerebral function in primates: I. The functions of the frontal association area in monkeys, Comp Psychol Monogr, 13, 3
  43. 10.1037/0735-7044.103.3.548 · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.103.3.548 · Paper page
  44. 10.1159/000123811 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91145-3 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kubota K, 1990, Prefrontal cortical unit activity and delayed alternation performance in monkeys, J Neurophysiol, 34, 337, 10.1152/jn.1971.34.3.337 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90117-1 · DOI
  48. LaVail JH, 1975, The use of axonal transport for studies of neuronal connectivity, 217
  49. 10.1038/scientificamerican0694-50 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Lorente de Nó R, 1934, Studies on the structure of the cerebral cortex. II. Continuation study of the ammonic system, J Psychol Neurol, 46, 113
  51. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90005-4 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/0028-3932(72)90043-7 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Mahut H, 1982, Hippocampal resections impair associative learning and recognition memory in the monkey, J Neurosci, 2, 1214, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-09-01214.1982 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/0149-7634(82)90046-X · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1002/cne.902510302 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002101 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Mesulam M‐M, 1982, Tracing neuronal connections with horseradish peroxidase, 1
  58. 10.1177/28.11.6159394 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80143-5 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500370084024 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0022-3956(71)90017-3 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Nauta WJH, 1972, Neural associations of the frontal cortex, Acta Neurobiol Exp, 32, 125
  63. Nauta WJH, 1979, Functional neurosurgery, 7
  64. Nishijo H, 1988, Single neuron responses in amygdala of alert monkey during complex sensory stimulation with affective significance, J Neurosci, 8, 3570, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-10-03570.1988 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-11-04159.1988 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Petrides M, 1989, Handbook of neuropsychology, 75
  67. Rempel‐ClowerN(1994)Human amnesia and the hippocampal region: neuropsychological and neuropathological findings from two new patients. Ph. D. thesis University of California at San Diego.
  68. 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90485-2 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1126/science.410102 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1007/978-1-4615-6616-8_9 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1177/34.10.3745909 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1002/cne.902710202 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/0168-0102(88)90030-2 · DOI
  74. 10.1002/aja.1001560107 · DOI
  75. 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1097/00005053-196709000-00001 · DOI
  77. 10.1002/cne.901910208 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Von Bonin G, 1947, The neocortex of Macaca mulatta
  79. 10.3758/BF03326525 · DOI
  80. 10.1126/science.8316836 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002555 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-03-00898.1989 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-06-01922.1989 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Barbas, H., & Blatt, G. J.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
511-533
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2091083748
Cited by
452
References
11
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topographically specific hippocampal projections target functionally distinct prefrontal areas in the rhesus monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hipo.450050604
The paper
Barbas, H., & Blatt, G. J. (1995). Topographically specific hippocampal projections target functionally distinct prefrontal areas in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450050604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.