Cited by 28Physical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The relation between children’s aerobic fitness and executive functions: A systematic review

Open access
Van Waelvelde, Hilde, Vanden Wyngaert, Karsten, Mariën, Tineke, Baeyens, Dieter, Calders, Patrick·2020·Infant and Child Development

Abstract

A beneficial effect of physical activity on cognitive functioning is supposed, although to a certain extent, literature remains inconsistent. Furthermore, the mediating effect of aerobic fitness on this association remains unclear, especially in children. This review presents data from 26 articles on the relation between aerobic fitness and executive functions (i.e., inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility) in prepubertal children (6–12 years). The qualitative synthesis was complicated by the use of diverse outcome measures to evaluate executive functions and the inconsistent inclusion of confounders. In general, cross‐sectional studies reported enhanced executive functioning in children with higher aerobic fitness levels. Only three intervention studies with inconclusive results were retrieved. Whereas a beneficial effect of aerobic fitness on executive functioning in children is often supposed, the available research does not allow to draw a causal conclusion. Good quality randomized‐controlled trials are necessary. Highlights: This study reviewed the supposed mediating effect of aerobic fitness on the positive association between physical activity and executive functioning. Three intervention studies and 23 cross‐sectional studies confirmed a positive correlation between aerobic fitness and certain measures of executive functioning. A causal conclusion about the beneficial effect of aerobic fitness on executive functioning cannot be drawn from this review.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/icd.2163

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Waelvelde, H., Vanden Wyngaert, K., Mariën, T., Baeyens, D., & Calders, P.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences Gent University Gent Belgium
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Infant and Child Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-30
Volume
29
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1522-7219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-7227
OpenAlex
W2997888638
Cited by
28
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant and Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, executive function, children, physical activity, cognitive flexibility, working memory, inhibition, prepubertal children, mediating effect, physical activity and cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review