Cited by 85Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of abbreviated CBT for insomnia in psychiatric outpatients: sleep and depression outcomes

Wagley, J. Nile, Rybarczyk, Bruce, Nay, William T., Danish, Steven, Lund, Hannah G.·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of cogntive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as a supplement treatment for psychiatric outpatients. Comorbid insomnia is prevalent among individuals with varied psychiatric disorders and evidence indicates that CBT-I may be effective for reducing insomnia and other psychiatric symptoms. METHOD: The present study randomly assigned 30 psychiatric outpatients (mean duration of treatment = 3.6 years) with low sleep quality and residual depressive symptoms to two sessions of CBT-I or a treatment as usual control group. Assessment included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) for insomnia and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression at pretreatment and 4 and 8 weeks posttreatment. RESULTS: Patients who received CBT-I demonstrated within group changes in PSQI and the PHQ-9 scores at both 4 and 8 weeks posttreatment, but did not show between-group differences. Additionally, 38% of the treatment participants achieved normal sleep at follow-up compared with none in the control condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that abbreviated behavioral treatment has beneficial effects on residual insomnia and depression in long-term psychiatric outpatients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.21927

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagley, J. N., Rybarczyk, B., Nay, W. T., Danish, S., & Lund, H. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Rybarczyk, Bruce
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-26
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
1043-1055
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2112906523
Cited by
85
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, insomnia, depression, psychiatric outpatients, sleep quality, residual depressive symptoms, comorbid insomnia, long-term psychiatric patients, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychotherapy, Brief, Sleep, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review