Cited by 499DNA Repair MechanismsEffects of Radiation ExposureGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Mechanisms and Consequences of Double‐Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin

Open access
Cannan, Wendy J., Pederson, David S.·2016·Journal of Cellular Physiology

Abstract

All organisms suffer double‐strand breaks (DSBs) in their DNA as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs can also form when replication forks encounter DNA lesions or repair intermediates. The processing and repair of DSBs can lead to mutations, loss of heterozygosity, and chromosome rearrangements that result in cell death or cancer. The most common pathway used to repair DSBs in metazoans (non‐homologous DNA end joining) is more commonly mutagenic than the alternative pathway (homologous recombination mediated repair). Thus, factors that influence the choice of pathways used DSB repair can affect an individual's mutation burden and risk of cancer. This review describes radiological, chemical, and biological mechanisms that generate DSBs, and discusses the impact of such variables as DSB etiology, cell type, cell cycle, and chromatin structure on the yield, distribution, and processing of DSBs. The final section focuses on nucleosome‐specific mechanisms that influence DSB production, and the possible relationship between higher order chromosome coiling and chromosome shattering (chromothripsis). J. Cell. Physiol. 230: 3–14, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcp.25048

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SSBs may form DSBs through collision with the transcriptional machinery and replication forks, or through close proximity to another SSB.

    “SSBs may form DSBs through their collision with the transcriptional machinery and replication forks, or through their close proximity to another SSB.”

    From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Cannan & Pederson, 2016

  • DSBs are directly generated by transcription, whereby TOP2 induces transient DSBs to relieve torsional stress and facilitate gene expression.

    “DSBs are also directly generated by transcription (Cannan & Pederson, 2016), whereby topoisomerase II (TOP2) induces transient DSBs to relieve torsional stress and facilitate gene expression.”

    From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Cannan & Pederson, 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective 2009 Geneva 23762967

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannan, W. J., & Pederson, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Pederson, David S.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-28
Volume
231
Issue
1
Pages
3-14
ISSN
  • 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4652
OpenAlex
W1783508367
Cited by
499
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cellular Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NCI (P01-CA098993)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA double-strand breaks, chromatin, ionizing radiation, DNA damage mechanisms, DNA repair pathways, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination, mutational burden, loss of heterozygosity, chromosomal rearrangements, nucleosome, chromatin structure, cell cycle, replication fork stalling, chromothripsis, chromosome coiling
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Cycle, Chromatin, DNA Repair, Humans, Radiation, Ionizing, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA End-Joining Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review