CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle
Open accessAbstract
The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is tightly regulated during the cell cycle. In G1 phase, the absence of a sister chromatid means that repair of DSBs occurs through non-homologous end-joining or microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). These pathways often involve loss of DNA sequences at the break site and are therefore error-prone. In late S and G2 phases, even though DNA end-joining pathways remain functional, there is an increase in repair of DSBs by homologous recombination, which is mostly error-free. Consequently, the relative contribution of these different pathways to DSB repair in the cell cycle has a large influence on the maintenance of genetic integrity. It has remained unknown how DSBs are directed for repair by different, potentially competing, repair pathways. Here we identify a role for CtIP (also known as RBBP8) in this process in the avian B-cell line DT40. We establish that CtIP is required not only for repair of DSBs by homologous recombination in S/G2 phase but also for MMEJ in G1. The function of CtIP in homologous recombination, but not MMEJ, is dependent on the phosphorylation of serine residue 327 and recruitment of BRCA1. Cells expressing CtIP protein that cannot be phosphorylated at serine 327 are specifically defective in homologous recombination and have a decreased level of single-stranded DNA after DNA damage, whereas MMEJ remains unaffected. Our data support a model in which phosphorylation of serine 327 of CtIP as cells enter S phase and the recruitment of BRCA1 functions as a molecular switch to shift the balance of DSB repair from error-prone DNA end-joining to error-free homologous recombination.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MMEJ functions when DNA bases contain a small amount of sequence homology (microhomology), which can be either terminal on broken ends or embedded within the broken piece of DNA.
“This functions when DNA bases contain a small amount of sequence homology (microhomology), which can be either terminal on broken ends or embedded within the broken piece of DNA.”
From Integration of DNA damage and repair with murine double-minute 2 (Mdm2) in tumorigenesis (2012) · cites this paper as [70]
A recently discovered sub-pathway called microhomology mediated end joining (MMEJ) operates in conjunction with both NHEJ and HR and utilizes CtIP.
“It is important to note that a recently discovered sub-pathway operates in conjunction with both NHEJ and HR called microhomology mediated end joining (MMEJ) utilizing a protein called CtIP [70,71].”
From Integration of DNA damage and repair with murine double-minute 2 (Mdm2) in tumorigenesis (2012) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120 · see citing works
XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cellsPreprint
Pierce, A. J., Johnson, R. D., Thompson, L. H., & Jasin, M. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.20.2633 · Cited by 1,384 · see citing works
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Sonoda, E., Morrison, C., Hashimoto, M., Utsumi, H., Yamaguchi‐Iwai, Y., Shinohara, A., & Takeda, S. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.18.5497 · Cited by 1,229 · see citing works
Alternative-NHEJ Is a Mechanistically Distinct Pathway of Mammalian Chromosome Break Repair
Bennardo, N., Cheng, A., Huang, N., & Stark, J. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000110 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1
Ira, G., Pellicioli, A., Balijja, A., Wang, X., Fiorani, S., Carotenuto, W., Liberi, G., Bressan, D., Wan, L., Hollingsworth, N. M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02964 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Role of the human RAD51 protein in homologous recombination and double-stranded-break repair
Baumann, P., & West, S. C. (1998) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01232-8 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Genetic Steps of Mammalian Homologous Repair with Distinct Mutagenic Consequences
Stark, J. M., Pierce, A. J., Oh, J., Pastink, A., & Jasin, M. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.21.9305-9316.2004 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination
Huertas, P., Cortés‐Ledesma, F., Sartori, A. A., Aguilera, A., & Jackson, S. P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07215 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Yu, X., & Chen, J. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.21.9478-9486.2004 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Yu, X., Wu, L. C., Bowcock, A. M., Aronheim, A., & Baer, R. J. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.39.25388 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Ma, N. J.-L., Kim, E. M., Haber, J. E., & Lee, S. E. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.23.8820-8828.2003 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes
Greenberg, R. A., Sobhian, B., Pathania, S., Cantor, S. B., Nakatani, Y., & Livingston, D. M. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1381306 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells
Kim, J. S., Krasieva, T. B., Kurumizaka, H., Chen, D. J., Taylor, A. M. R., & Yokomori, K. (2005) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200411083 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Bridge, W. L., Vandenberg, C. J., Franklin, R., & Hiom, K. J. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1627 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationNijmegen breakage syndrome gene, NBS1, and molecular links to factors for genome stability
Tauchi, H., Matsuura, S., Kobayashi, J., Sakamoto, S., & Komatsu, K. (2002) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206136 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Simpson, L. J., & Sale, J. E. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg161 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Chen, P., Liu, F., Cai, S., Lin, X., Li, A., Chen, Y., Gu, B., Lee, E. Y.-H. P., & Lee, W. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.9.3535-3542.2005 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Cyclin-dependent kinases: inhibition and substrate recognition
Endicott, J., Noble, M. E. M., & Tucker, J. A. (1999) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(99)00038-x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
BRCA1 Promotes Induction of ssDNA by Ionizing Radiation
Schlegel, B. P., Jodelka, F. M., & Núñez, R. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3209 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Reverse genetic studies of homologous DNA recombination using the chicken B–lymphocyte line, DT40
Sonoda, E., Morrison, C. G., Yamashita, Y. M., Takata, M., & Takeda, S. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0755 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368 · see citing works
Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E., & Gianni, L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66 · Cited by 3,079 · see citing works
53BP1 Inhibits Homologous Recombination in Brca1-Deficient Cells by Blocking Resection of DNA Breaks
Bunting, S. F., Callén, E., Wong, N., Chen, H.-T., Polato, F., Gunn, A., Bothmer, A., Feldhahn, N., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Cao, L., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012 · Cited by 1,671 · see citing works
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Homologous Recombination and Human Health: The Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Proteins
Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., & Jasin, M. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016600 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends
Stracker, T. H., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3047 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells
Iyama, T., & Wilson, D. M. (2013) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.015 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Lukas, J., Lukas, C., & Bartek, J. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2344 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination
Tang, J., Cho, N. W., Cui, G., Manion, E. M., Shanbhag, N. M., Botuyan, M. V., Mer, G., & Greenberg, R. A. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2499 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Mechanisms and Consequences of Double‐Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin
Cannan, W. J., & Pederson, D. S. (2016) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25048 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
“Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase, for example, can require several hours to remove phosphoglycolate moieties from 3’ DNA ends (Zhou et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe MRN complex in double‐strand break repair and telomere maintenance
Lamarche, B. J., Orazio, N. I., & Weitzman, M. D. (2010) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.029 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Thompson, L. H. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancer
Aparicio, T., Baer, R., & Gautier, J. (2014) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.014 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Ayrapetov, M. K., Xu, C., Gursoy-Yuzugullu, O., Hu, Y., & Price, B. D. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Collaboration and competition between DNA double‐strand break repair pathways
Kass, E. M., & Jasin, M. (2010) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.057 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
BRCA1 functions independently of homologous recombination in DNA interstrand crosslink repair
Bunting, S. F., Callén, E., Kozak, M. L., Kim, J. M., Wong, N., López-Contreras, A. J., Ludwig, T., Baer, R., Faryabi, R. B., Malhowski, A., et al. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.02.015 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage
Yin, Y., Seifert, A., Chua, J. S., Maure, J.-F., Golebiowski, F., & Hay, R. T. (2012) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.189274.112 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
CtIP Links DNA Double-Strand Break Sensing to Resection
You, Z., Shi, L. Z., Zhu, Q., Wu, P., Zhang, Y.-W., Basilio, A., Tonnu, N., Verma, I. M., Berns, M. W., & Hunter, T. (2009) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.002 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
A Macrohistone Variant Links Dynamic Chromatin Compaction to BRCA1-Dependent Genome Maintenance
Khurana, S., Kruhlak, M. J., Kim, J., Tran, A. D., Liu, J., Nyswaner, K., Shi, L., Jailwala, P., Sung, M.-H., Hakim, O., et al. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.024 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Tichy, E. D., Pillai, R., Deng, L., Liang, L., Tischfield, J., Schwemberger, S. J., Babcock, G. F., & Stambrook, P. J. (2010) · Stem Cells and Development · doi:10.1089/scd.2010.0058 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks
Finn, K., Lowndes, N. F., & Grenon, M. (2012) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0875-3 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks
Gobbini, E., Cesena, D., Galbiati, A., Lockhart, A., & Longhese, M. P. (2013) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.009 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Peng, Y., Liao, Q., Tan, W., Peng, C., Hu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Li, J., Zhen, B., Zhu, W., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09232-8 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
BRCA1 tumor suppressor network: focusing on its tail
Wang, B. (2012) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/2045-3701-2-6 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Brem, R., Li, F., Montaner, B., Reelfs, O., & Karran, P. (2010) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2010.140 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
An LTR retrotransposon‐derived lncRNA interacts with RNF169 to promote homologous recombination
Deng, B., Xu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, C., Lin, P., Li, B., Huang, Q., Yang, J., Zhou, H., & Qu, L. (2019) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201847650 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
BRCA1 and CtIP Are Both Required to Recruit Dna2 at Double-Strand Breaks in Homologous Recombination
Hoa, N. N., Kobayashi, J., Omura, M., Hirakawa, M., Yang, S.-H., Komatsu, K., Paull, T. T., Takeda, S., & Sasanuma, H. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124495 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Integration of DNA damage and repair with murine double-minute 2 (Mdm2) in tumorigenesis
Lehman, J., & Mayo, L. (2012) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms131216373 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yun, M. H., & Hiom, K.
- Affiliations
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hiom, Kevin
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-04-08
- Volume
- 459
- Issue
- 7245
- Pages
- 460-463
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2857324
- OpenAlex
- W2026959390
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Keywords
- CtIP, BRCA1, DNA double-strand break repair, homologous recombination, non-homologous end joining, microhomology-mediated end joining, DNA end resection, RBBP8, G1 phase, S/G2 phase, DT40 B cells
- MeSH terms
- Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Carrier Proteins, Cell Cycle, Cell Line, Chickens, Cisplatin, DNA Repair, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Phosphoserine, Recombination, Genetic, X-Rays, G1 Phase, G2 Phase, S Phase, BRCA1 Protein, Avian Proteins, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review