Cited by 96Exercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Interleukin-10 responses from acute exercise in healthy subjects: A systematic review

Open access
Cabral‐Santos, Carolina, de Lima Junior, Edson Alves, Fernandes, Isabela Maia da Cruz, Pinto, Rafael Zambelli, Rosa‐Neto, José César, Bishop, Nicolette Charllote, Lira, Fábio Santos·2019·Journal of Cellular Physiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interleukin 10 (IL-10) is a cytokine that plays a critical role with potent anti-inflammatory properties when produced during exercise, limiting host immune response to pathogens and preventing tissue damage. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the response of IL-10 after acute exercise session in healthy adults. METHODS: Databases of Ovid Medline (1978-2016), CINAHL (1998-2016), EMBASE (2003-2016), SportDiscus (1990-2016), and Web of Science library (1990-2016) were carefully screened. Clinical trials comparing exercise types in healthy individuals were included for pooled analysis. The trials of exercise were methodologically appraised by PEDro Scale. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled and crossover trials containing 176 individuals were identified for inclusion. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant differences between type of exercise and the corresponding values in IL-10 [X2(4) = 2.878; p = 0.449]. The duration of exercise was significantly correlated with increase in IL-10 changes (Pearson's r = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.015-0.042, p < 0.0001) indicating that 48% of the variation in IL-10 levels can be explained by the duration of the exercise performed. In addition, despite a linear increase, we did not find a significant correlation with the intensity of exercise and IL-10 changes (Pearson's r = 0.218, 95%CI: -0.554-0.042, p < 0.035). CONCLUSION: Overall, the duration of the exercise is the single most important factor determining the magnitude of the exercise-induced increase of plasma IL-10.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcp.27920

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1209 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ghafourian, M., Ashtary-Larky, D., Chinipardaz, R., Eskandary, N., & Mehavaran, M. (2016). Inflammatory biomarker response to two different intensities of a single bout exercise among soccer players. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 18, e21498.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabral‐Santos, C., de Lima Junior, E. A., Fernandes, I. M. D. C., Pinto, R. Z., Rosa‐Neto, J. C., Bishop, N. C., & Lira, F. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology University of São Paulo Butantã São Paulo Brazil
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences and National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University Loughborough United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Lira, Fábio Santos
Venue
Journal of Cellular Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-07
Volume
234
Issue
7
Pages
9956-9965
ISSN
  • 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4652
OpenAlex
W2905098449
Cited by
96
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cellular Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/17068‐2, 2016/1409‐8, 2016/16712‐8, 2015/26148‐0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
IL-10, acute exercise, anti-inflammatory response, exercise duration, exercise intensity, plasma cytokines, exercise type, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Exercise, Up-Regulation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Interleukin-10, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review