Cited by 747Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Open access
Compher, Charlene, Bingham, Angela L., McCall, Michele, Patel, Jayshil, Rice, Todd W., Braunschweig, Carol, McKeever, Liam·2022·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: This guideline updates recommendations from the 2016 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)/Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) critical care nutrition guideline for five foundational questions central to critical care nutrition support. Methods: The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to develop and summarize evidence for clinical practice recommendations. Clinical outcomes were assessed for (1) higher vs lower energy dose, (2) higher vs lower protein dose, (3) exclusive isocaloric parenteral nutrition (PN) vs enteral nutrition (EN), (4) supplemental PN (SPN) plus EN vs EN alone, (5A) mixed‐oil lipid injectable emulsions (ILEs) vs soybean oil, and (5B) fish oil (FO)–containing ILE vs non‐FO ILE. To assess safety, weight‐based energy intake and protein were plotted against hospital mortality. Results: Between January 1, 2001, and July 15, 2020, 2320 citations were identified and data were abstracted from 36 trials including 20,578 participants. Patients receiving FO had decreased pneumonia rates of uncertain clinical significance. Otherwise, there were no differences for any outcome in any question. Owing to a lack of certainty regarding harm, the energy prescription recommendation was decreased to 12–25 kcal/kg/day. Conclusion: No differences in clinical outcomes were identified among numerous nutrition interventions, including higher energy or protein intake, isocaloric PN or EN, SPN, or different ILEs. As more consistent critical care nutrition support data become available, more precise recommendations will be possible. In the meantime, clinical judgment and close monitoring are needed. This paper was approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jpen.2267

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ASPEN and the Society of Critical Care Medicine favor individualized protein intake targets within the 1.2-2.0 g/kg/d range, with cautious consideration of higher intake in select patients with burns, trauma, or obesity.

    “the most appropriate protein intake approaches for the CICU population are likely those in alignment with evidence-based guidance from ASPEN and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, which favor individualized protein intake targets within the 1.2– to 2.0–g·kg−1·d−1 range, with cautious consideration of higher intake in select patients with burns, trauma, or obesity.148–150”
  • Recent guidelines written by ESPEN, ASPEN/SCCM, the Canadian Critical Care Practice Guideline group and the ESICM working group were considered when formulating the updated ESPEN recommendations.

    “Recent guidelines written by ESPEN [1,2], ASPEN/SCCM [32], the Canadian Critical Care Practice Guideline group [29] and the most recent clinical practice guidelines on early EN in critically ill patients by the ESICM working group on gastrointestinal function [13] were considered when formulating the updated ESPEN recommendations [4].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Compher, C., Bingham, A. L., McCall, M., Patel, J., Rice, T. W., Braunschweig, C., & McKeever, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of the Sciences (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
McKeever, Liam
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
12-41
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W3212404418
Cited by
747
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 198 · 2025: 176 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 2
FWCI
59.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
critical care nutrition, nutrition support therapy, critically ill adults, energy dose, protein dose, parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, lipid emulsions, fish oil, soybean oil, pneumonia, in-hospital mortality
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Parenteral Nutrition, Critical Illness, Nutritional Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review