Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land‐use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie

Wait, Kyle R., Ricketts, Andrew M., Ahlers, Adam A.·2018·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

The Flint Hills ecoregion is the largest remaining tract of native tallgrass prairie in North America. Contemporary landscape change (e.g., urbanization, agricultural production) in this region is likely affecting native biodiversity; however, we have a limited understanding of how these changes might affect carnivores. We used camera traps distributed across urban‐rural land‐use gradients, and multiseason occupancy models, to investigate the influence of landscape structure and composition on habitat occupancy dynamics of 3 native carnivores (coyote [Canis latrans]; bobcat [Lynx rufus]; and striped skunk [Mephitis mephitis]) and 1 nonnative carnivore (domestic cat) in the Flint Hills, Kansas, USA, during 2016–2017. Additionally, we assessed the potential for coyotes, the apex predator in the Flint Hills, to mediate habitat occupancy of domestic cats. We also examined the relative influence of landscape factors on native carnivore species richness and diversity. As predicted, coyotes were less likely to occupy and colonize sites, and more likely to leave sites, surrounded by urban landcover. Habitat occupancy by bobcats was positively associated with forest landcover and edge densities; however, bobcats seemed insensitive to urban landcover. Additionally, bobcats were more likely to colonize sites with more grassland and row‐crop agriculture landcover. Surprisingly, striped skunk occupancy and colonization rates at sites were negatively related to urban landcover. As expected, domestic cats were more likely to occur at and colonize sites with increased urban landcover and less likely at sites with high coyote occupancy probabilities. Carnivore species diversity and richness were negatively related to the urban landcover. Our results suggest that urban landcover may limit the spatial distributions of some native carnivores in the Flint Hills and contribute to reduced carnivore diversity. Moreover, urban landcover in the Flint Hills may provide domestic cats with refugia from intraguild pressures by coyotes. Our results provide wildlife managers with insights into how contemporary landscape change in this imperiled ecosystem may affect biodiversity conservation and maintenance. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jwmg.21492

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 98

  1. 10.1007/s10980-016-0350-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1644/BWG-207.1 · doi:10.1644/bwg-207.1
  5. 10.1007/s10531-010-9791-3 · DOI
  6. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/2269387 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0164:BABAAU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bock J. H., 1998, Tallgrass prairie: remnants and relicts, Great Plains Research, 8, 213
  10. 10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0287:EOWPIT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brillhart D., 1994, Temporal variation in coyote prey in tallgrass prairie of eastern Kansas, Prairie Naturalist, 26, 93
  12. Brillhart D., 1995, Spatial and seasonal variation in prey use by coyotes in north‐central Kansas, Southwestern Naturalist, 40, 160
  13. 10.1890/03-5220 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Burnham K. P. andD. R.Anderson.2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information‐theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media New York New York USA.
  15. 10.2307/2426874 · doi:10.2307/2426874
  16. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98364.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98364.x
  17. 10.1071/WR16052 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/wsb.502 · doi:10.1002/wsb.502
  19. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/s10980-010-9529-3 · doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9529-3
  21. 10.1674/0003-0031-168.2.456 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1890/100063 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11252-006-3262-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.026 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cvex.2009.01.012 · DOI
  27. 10.2981/wlb.00237 · DOI
  28. Fahrig L., 1999, Forest fragmentation; wildlife and management implications, 87
  29. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240310.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.18637/jss.v043.i10 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1002/eap.1611 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00156-8 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1644/04-MAMM-A-173R2.1 · DOI
  35. 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-277.1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075718 · DOI
  37. 10.56021/9780801893896 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.024 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2307/3672519 · doi:10.2307/3672519
  40. Gittleman J., 2001, Strategies for carnivore conservation: lessons from contemporary extinctions, Carnivore Conservation, 5, 61
  41. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146055 · DOI
  42. 10.2307/3803065 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Greenwood R. J., 1999, Foods and foraging of prairie striped skunks during the avian nesting season, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 823
  44. 10.1126/science.1150195 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.2193/2008-033 · DOI
  46. 10.1890/05-5221 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1371/journal.pone.0132203 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/jwmg.145 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12230.x · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1177/194008291100400203 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x · DOI · Paper page
  52. Kamler J. F., 2000, Home range, habitat selection, and survival of bobcats, Lynx rufus, in a prairie ecosystem in Kansas, Canadian Field‐Naturalist, 114, 388, 10.5962/p.363990 · DOI
  53. 10.1139/z00-153 · doi:10.1139/z00-153
  54. 10.1674/0003-0031(2005)153[0396:HRAHUO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/jmammal/gyv100 · DOI
  56. 10.1890/07-0298.1 · DOI
  57. 10.2307/1310387 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.2307/1382112 · DOI
  59. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00301.x · DOI
  60. Lesmeister D. B., 2015, Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern North America: Midwestern carnivore guild structure, Wildlife Monographs, 191
  61. 10.1674/0003-0031(1999)142[0372:IAREON]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  62. 10.1139/z89-170 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s10980-014-0034-y · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1007/s11252-017-0676-z · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s10980-010-9547-1 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/ncomms1396 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1111/brv.12012 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Lubowski R. N. M.Vesterby S.Bucholtz A.Baez andM. J.Roberts.2006. Major uses of land in the United States 2002. Economic Information Bulletin 14. U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington D.C. USA.
  69. 10.1111/acv.12231 · DOI
  70. 10.2307/3801278 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_2 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003280.x · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00663.x · DOI
  74. 10.3160/0038-3872(2008)107[57:AICSOG]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1111/1365-2664.12563 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/ncomms15469 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1017/S1367943003003172 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-312.1 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.2307/3808971 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/jmammal/gyw090 · DOI
  83. 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-236R1.1 · DOI
  84. 10.2307/3802774 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.9 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Quinn T., 1997, Coyote (Canis latrans) food habits in three urban habitat types of western Washington, Northwest Science, 71, 1
  87. 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-224R2.1 · DOI
  88. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01458.x · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.2307/1312365 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023777 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.2307/1378389 · doi:10.2307/1378389
  92. 10.7717/peerj.374 · DOI
  93. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00444.x · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1139/z89-183 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00120-9 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.2193/2007-291 · DOI
  97. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02099.x · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.18637/jss.v027.i08 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Wait, K. R., Ricketts, A. M., & Ahlers, A. A.
Affiliations
Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources Kansas State University Manhattan KS 66506 USA
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-08
Volume
82
Issue
7
Pages
1491-1502
ISSN
  • 0022-541X
  • 1937-2817
Cited by
23
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land‐use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jwmg.21492
The paper
Wait, K. R., Ricketts, A. M., & Ahlers, A. A. (2018). Land‐use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21492

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.