The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Land‐use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie
Abstract
The Flint Hills ecoregion is the largest remaining tract of native tallgrass prairie in North America. Contemporary landscape change (e.g., urbanization, agricultural production) in this region is likely affecting native biodiversity; however, we have a limited understanding of how these changes might affect carnivores. We used camera traps distributed across urban‐rural land‐use gradients, and multiseason occupancy models, to investigate the influence of landscape structure and composition on habitat occupancy dynamics of 3 native carnivores (coyote [Canis latrans]; bobcat [Lynx rufus]; and striped skunk [Mephitis mephitis]) and 1 nonnative carnivore (domestic cat) in the Flint Hills, Kansas, USA, during 2016–2017. Additionally, we assessed the potential for coyotes, the apex predator in the Flint Hills, to mediate habitat occupancy of domestic cats. We also examined the relative influence of landscape factors on native carnivore species richness and diversity. As predicted, coyotes were less likely to occupy and colonize sites, and more likely to leave sites, surrounded by urban landcover. Habitat occupancy by bobcats was positively associated with forest landcover and edge densities; however, bobcats seemed insensitive to urban landcover. Additionally, bobcats were more likely to colonize sites with more grassland and row‐crop agriculture landcover. Surprisingly, striped skunk occupancy and colonization rates at sites were negatively related to urban landcover. As expected, domestic cats were more likely to occur at and colonize sites with increased urban landcover and less likely at sites with high coyote occupancy probabilities. Carnivore species diversity and richness were negatively related to the urban landcover. Our results suggest that urban landcover may limit the spatial distributions of some native carnivores in the Flint Hills and contribute to reduced carnivore diversity. Moreover, urban landcover in the Flint Hills may provide domestic cats with refugia from intraguild pressures by coyotes. Our results provide wildlife managers with insights into how contemporary landscape change in this imperiled ecosystem may affect biodiversity conservation and maintenance. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies have found that coyotes avoid human development, while foxes avoid coyotes and tend to concentrate in areas that are highly developed (Cove et al., 2012; Moll et al., 2018; Wait et al., 2018).”
From Microbiomes in Canidae (2021) · cites this paper as Wait et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation
Crooks, K. R. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x · Cited by 943
Survival and Cause‐Specific Mortality of Red Foxes in Agricultural and Urban Areas of Illinois
GOSSELINK, T. E., VAN DEELEN, T. R., WARNER, R. E., & MANKIN, P. C. (2007) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2006-020 · Cited by 123
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 10.1007/s10980-016-0350-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1644/BWG-207.1 · doi:10.1644/bwg-207.1
- 10.1007/s10531-010-9791-3 · DOI
- 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2269387 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0164:BABAAU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Bock J. H., 1998, Tallgrass prairie: remnants and relicts, Great Plains Research, 8, 213
- 10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0287:EOWPIT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Brillhart D., 1994, Temporal variation in coyote prey in tallgrass prairie of eastern Kansas, Prairie Naturalist, 26, 93
- Brillhart D., 1995, Spatial and seasonal variation in prey use by coyotes in north‐central Kansas, Southwestern Naturalist, 40, 160
- 10.1890/03-5220 · DOI · Paper page
- Burnham K. P. andD. R.Anderson.2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information‐theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media New York New York USA.
- 10.2307/2426874 · doi:10.2307/2426874
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98364.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98364.x
- 10.1071/WR16052 · DOI
- 10.1002/wsb.502 · doi:10.1002/wsb.502
- 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10980-010-9529-3 · doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9529-3
- 10.1674/0003-0031-168.2.456 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/100063 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11252-006-3262-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cvex.2009.01.012 · DOI
- 10.2981/wlb.00237 · DOI
- Fahrig L., 1999, Forest fragmentation; wildlife and management implications, 87
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240310.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18637/jss.v043.i10 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eap.1611 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00156-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1644/04-MAMM-A-173R2.1 · DOI
- 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-277.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0075718 · DOI
- 10.56021/9780801893896 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3672519 · doi:10.2307/3672519
- Gittleman J., 2001, Strategies for carnivore conservation: lessons from contemporary extinctions, Carnivore Conservation, 5, 61
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0146055 · DOI
- 10.2307/3803065 · DOI · Paper page
- Greenwood R. J., 1999, Foods and foraging of prairie striped skunks during the avian nesting season, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 823
- 10.1126/science.1150195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2193/2008-033 · DOI
- 10.1890/05-5221 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0132203 · DOI
- 10.1002/jwmg.145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12230.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/194008291100400203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kamler J. F., 2000, Home range, habitat selection, and survival of bobcats, Lynx rufus, in a prairie ecosystem in Kansas, Canadian Field‐Naturalist, 114, 388, 10.5962/p.363990 · DOI
- 10.1139/z00-153 · doi:10.1139/z00-153
- 10.1674/0003-0031(2005)153[0396:HRAHUO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1093/jmammal/gyv100 · DOI
- 10.1890/07-0298.1 · DOI
- 10.2307/1310387 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1382112 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00301.x · DOI
- Lesmeister D. B., 2015, Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern North America: Midwestern carnivore guild structure, Wildlife Monographs, 191
- 10.1674/0003-0031(1999)142[0372:IAREON]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1139/z89-170 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-014-0034-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11252-017-0676-z · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-010-9547-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms1396 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/brv.12012 · DOI · Paper page
- Lubowski R. N. M.Vesterby S.Bucholtz A.Baez andM. J.Roberts.2006. Major uses of land in the United States 2002. Economic Information Bulletin 14. U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington D.C. USA.
- 10.1111/acv.12231 · DOI
- 10.2307/3801278 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003280.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00663.x · DOI
- 10.3160/0038-3872(2008)107[57:AICSOG]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12563 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms15469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1367943003003172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-312.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3808971 · DOI
- 10.1093/jmammal/gyw090 · DOI
- 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-236R1.1 · DOI
- 10.2307/3802774 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.9 · DOI · Paper page
- Quinn T., 1997, Coyote (Canis latrans) food habits in three urban habitat types of western Washington, Northwest Science, 71, 1
- 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-224R2.1 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01458.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1312365 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0023777 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1378389 · doi:10.2307/1378389
- 10.7717/peerj.374 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00444.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/z89-183 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00120-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2193/2007-291 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02099.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18637/jss.v027.i08 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Biles, T. L., Beck, H., & Masters, B. S. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8449 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wait, K. R., Ricketts, A. M., & Ahlers, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources Kansas State University Manhattan KS 66506 USA
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-08
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1491-1502
- ISSN
- 0022-541X
- 1937-2817
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land‐use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jwmg.21492
- The paper
- Wait, K. R., Ricketts, A. M., & Ahlers, A. A. (2018). Land‐use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.