Cited by 69Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchNutritional Studies and Diet

Gut microbiome diversity influenced more by the Westernized dietary regime than the body mass index as assessed using effect size statistic

Open access
Davis, Shannon C., Yadav, Jagjit S., Barrow, Stephanie D., Robertson, Boakai K.·2017·MicrobiologyOpen

Abstract

Abstract Human gut microbiome dysbiosis has been associated with the onset of metabolic diseases and disorders. However, the critical factors leading to dysbiosis are poorly understood. In this study, we provide increasing evidence of the association of diet type and body mass index ( BMI ) and how they relatively influence the taxonomic structure of the gut microbiota with respect to the causation of gut microbiome dysbiosis. The study included randomly selected Alabama residents ( n = 81), including females ( n = 45) and males ( n = 36). The demographics data included age (33 ± 13.3 years), height (1.7 ± 0.11 meters), and weight (82.3 ± 20.6 kg). The mean BMI was 28.3 ± 7.01, equating to an overweight BMI category. A cross‐sectional case–control design encompassing the newly recognized effect size approach to bioinformatics analysis was used to analyze data from donated stool samples and accompanying nutrition surveys. We investigated the microbiome variations in the Bacteroidetes‐Firmicutes ratio relative to BMI , food categories, and dietary groups at stratified abundance percentages of <20%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and ≥70%. We further investigated variation in the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla composition (at the genus and species level) in relation to BMI , food categories, and dietary groups (Westernized or healthy). The Pearson Correlation coefficient as an indication of effect size across Alpha diversity indices was used to test the hypothesis (H 0 ): increased BMI has greater effect on taxonomic diversity than Westernized diet type, (H a ): increased BMI does not have a greater effect on taxonomic diversity than Westernized diet type. In conclusion, we rejected the (H 0 ) as our results demonstrated that Westernized diet type had an effect size of 0.22 posing a greater impact upon the gut microbiota diversity than an increased BMI with an effect size of 0.16. This implied Westernized diet as a critical factor in causing dysbiosis as compared to an overweight or obese body mass index.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mbo3.476

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The abundance of Dialister, Coprococcus, Megasphaera, Oscillospira, and Blautia obeum seemed to be most abundant in relation to intake of processed food in humans.

    “For example, the abundance of Dialister, Coprococcus, Megasphaera, Oscillospira, and Blautia obeum seemed to be most abundant in relation to the intake of processed food in humans (209).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Davis, S., Barrow, S., Javan, G., & Robertson, B. (2015). Survey of westernized dietary regime within the state of alabama. Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science (Internet), 3(4), 1071.
  2. United States Postal Service. (2015). Domestic Mail‐ Infectious Material (Internet). About.usps.com. (cited 11 December 2015). Available from: https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2006/html/pb22193/pb9d-e_001.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, S. C., Yadav, J. S., Barrow, S. D., & Robertson, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Alabama State University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Robertson, Boakai K.
Venue
MicrobiologyOpen
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-04
Volume
6
Issue
4
ISSN
2045-8827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2733554624
Cited by
69
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MicrobiologyOpen (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1432991)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
gut microbiota, microbiome diversity, Western diet, body mass index, obesity, dysbiosis, Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, dietary factors, effect size, alpha diversity, taxonomic composition
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Alabama, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Computational Biology, Gastrointestinal Tract, Young Adult, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review