Cited by 496Gut microbiota and healthGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Chapter 12: Human Microbiome Analysis

Open access
Morgan, Xochitl C., Huttenhower, Curtis·2012·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

Humans are essentially sterile during gestation, but during and after birth, every body surface, including the skin, mouth, and gut, becomes host to an enormous variety of microbes, bacterial, archaeal, fungal, and viral. Under normal circumstances, these microbes help us to digest our food and to maintain our immune systems, but dysfunction of the human microbiota has been linked to conditions ranging from inflammatory bowel disease to antibiotic-resistant infections. Modern high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic tools provide a powerful means of understanding the contribution of the human microbiome to health and its potential as a target for therapeutic interventions. This chapter will first discuss the historical origins of microbiome studies and methods for determining the ecological diversity of a microbial community. Next, it will introduce shotgun sequencing technologies such as metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, the computational challenges and methods associated with these data, and how they enable microbiome analysis. Finally, it will conclude with examples of the functional genomics of the human microbiome and its influences upon health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002808

Cites

179 of 179 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, X. C., & Huttenhower, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Huttenhower, Curtis
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
e1002808
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2102813808
Cited by
496
References
179
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 8
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
human microbiome, microbiota, metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, shotgun sequencing, microbial community diversity, functional genomics, inflammatory bowel disease, antibiotic resistance, microbial ecology
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Genes, Bacterial, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Metagenome, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review