Cited by 167Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Self‐management rehabilitation and health‐related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Tickle‐Degnen, Linda, Ellis, Terry, Saint‐Hilaire, Marie H., Thomas, Cathi A., Wagenaar, Robert C.·2010·Movement Disorders

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether increasing hours of self‐management rehabilitation had increasing benefits for health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in Parkinson's disease beyond best medical treatment, whether effects persisted at 2 and 6 months of follow‐up, and whether targeted compared with nontargeted HRQOL domains responded more to rehabilitation. Participants on best medication therapy were randomly assigned to one of three conditions for 6 weeks intervention: 0 hours of rehabilitation; 18 hours of clinic group rehabilitation plus 9 hours of attention control social sessions; and 27 hours of rehabilitation, with 18 in clinic group rehabilitation and 9 hours of rehabilitation designed to transfer clinic training into home and community routines. Results (N = 116) showed that at 6 weeks, there was a beneficial effect of increased rehabilitation hours on HRQOL measured with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire‐39 summary index (F(1,112) = 6.48, η = 0.23, CI = 0.05–0.40, P = 0.01). Benefits persisted at follow‐up. The difference between 18 and 27 hours was not significant. Clinically relevant improvement occurred at a greater rate for 18 and 27 hours (54% improved) than for 0 hours (18% improved), a significant 36% difference in rates (95% CI = 20–52% difference). Effects were largest in two targeted domains: communication and mobility. More concerns with mobility and activities of daily living at baseline predicted more benefit from rehabilitation. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.22940

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results underscore the reliability of smartphone-based interventions.

    “Consistent with prior studies, these results underscore the reliability of smartphone-based interventions [55,56].”

    From Smartphone-Based Speech Therapy for Poststroke Dysarthria: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Feasibility (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Methods > Intervention passage describes therapist-led clinic and home or community rehabilitation, not a smartphone-based intervention. The Results report adherence and health-related quality-of-life outcomes, but do not address the reliability of smartphone-based interventions. Searches for smartphone and mobile interventions found no passage on that point; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Livneh H Antonak RF Review of research on psychosocial adaptation to neuromuscular disorders: I. Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy, and Parkinson's Disease J Soc Behav Pers 1994 9 201 230
  2. [38]De Muth JE Basic statistics and pharmaceutical applications 2006 Chapman & Hall/CRC – Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton, FL 2nd ed.
  3. [44]Huang P-C Social behavior, gender, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease [dissertation] 2009 Boston University Boston (MA)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tickle‐Degnen, L., Ellis, T., Saint‐Hilaire, M. H., Thomas, C. A., & Wagenaar, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Tickle‐Degnen, Linda
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-30
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
194-204
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2101319411
Cited by
167
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (NAG21152)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, health-related quality of life, group rehabilitation, pharmacotherapy, communication, mobility (physical function), activities of daily living, treatment effects over time
MeSH terms
Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review