Cited by 76Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingCoenzyme Q10 studies and effects

A Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) in Parkinson's Disease

Open access
Payne, Thomas, Appleby, Matthew, Buckley, Ellen, van Gelder, Linda M.A., Mullish, Benjamin H., Sassani, Matilde, Dunning, Mark J., Hernandez, Dena +11 more·2023·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Background: Rescue of mitochondrial function is a promising neuroprotective strategy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has shown considerable promise as a mitochondrial rescue agent across a range of preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of PD. Objectives: To investigate the safety and tolerability of high‐dose UDCA in PD and determine midbrain target engagement. Methods: The UP (UDCA in PD) study was a phase II, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of UDCA (30 mg/kg daily, 2:1 randomization UDCA vs. placebo) in 30 participants with PD for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included 31‐phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31 P‐MRS) to explore target engagement of UDCA in PD midbrain and assessment of motor progression, applying both the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS‐UPDRS‐III) and objective, motion sensor‐based quantification of gait impairment. Results: UDCA was safe and well tolerated, and only mild transient gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent in the UDCA treatment group. Midbrain 31 P‐MRS demonstrated an increase in both Gibbs free energy and inorganic phosphate levels in the UDCA treatment group compared to placebo, reflecting improved ATP hydrolysis. Sensor‐based gait analysis indicated a possible improvement of cadence (steps per minute) and other gait parameters in the UDCA group compared to placebo. In contrast, subjective assessment applying the MDS‐UPDRS‐III failed to detect a difference between treatment groups. Conclusions: High‐dose UDCA is safe and well tolerated in early PD. Larger trials are needed to further evaluate the disease‐modifying effect of UDCA in PD. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.29450

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Payne, T., Appleby, M., Buckley, E., van Gelder, L. M. A., Mullish, B. H., Sassani, M., Dunning, M. J., Hernandez, D., Scholz, S. W., McNeill, A., Libri, V., Moll, S., Marchesi, J. R., Taylor, R., Su, L., Mazzà, C., Jenkins, T. M., Foltynie, T., & Bandmann, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Insigneo (GB)
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for In Silico Medicine The University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
  • St Mary's Hospital (GB)
  • Molecular Genetics Section Laboratory of Neurogenetics Bethesda Maryland USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Bandmann, Oliver
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-29
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1493-1502
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W4378640215
Cited by
76
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5
FWCI
12.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • CPT
  • Jon Moulton Charity Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Keywords
ursodeoxycholic acid, Parkinson's disease, mitochondrial function, neuroprotection, midbrain, 31P NMR, ATP hydrolysis, Gibbs free energy, inorganic phosphate, gait disturbance, motor progression, drug safety and tolerability, disease-modifying therapy
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Ursodeoxycholic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review