Cited by 84Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Prediction of outcome in internet‐delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric obsessive‐compulsive disorder: A machine learning approach

Open access
Lenhard, Fabian, Sauer, Sebastian, Andersson, Erik, Månsson, Kristoffer NT, Mataix‐Cols, David, Rück, Christian, Serlachius, Eva·2018·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background: There are no consistent predictors of treatment outcome in paediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). One reason for this might be the use of suboptimal statistical methodology. Machine learning is an approach to efficiently analyse complex data. Machine learning has been widely used within other fields, but has rarely been tested in the prediction of paediatric mental health treatment outcomes. Objective: To test four different machine learning methods in the prediction of treatment response in a sample of paediatric OCD patients who had received Internet‐delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT). Methods: Participants were 61 adolescents (12–17 years) who enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and received ICBT. All clinical baseline variables were used to predict strictly defined treatment response status three months after ICBT. Four machine learning algorithms were implemented. For comparison, we also employed a traditional logistic regression approach. Results: Multivariate logistic regression could not detect any significant predictors. In contrast, all four machine learning algorithms performed well in the prediction of treatment response, with 75 to 83% accuracy. Conclusions: The results suggest that machine learning algorithms can successfully be applied to predict paediatric OCD treatment outcome. Validation studies and studies in other disorders are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.1576

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that ranked high for selective reporting bias tended to report only user satisfaction data and treatment adherence, despite their methods considering collection and assessment of psychiatric scale data and other effectiveness outcomes.

    “The studies that ranked high for selective reporting bias tended to report only user satisfaction data and treatment adherence, despite their methods considering the collection and assessment of psychiatric scale data and other effectiveness outcomes (29, 76, 79, 85–88, 92).”

    From Examining the role of AI technology in online mental healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and implications, a mixed-methods review (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lenhard et al. (2018) suggested that eCBT for OCD may be better suited for individuals with mild to moderate symptoms.

    “Based on these results they suggested that eCBT for OCD may be better suited for individuals with mild to moderate symptoms (88).”

    From Examining the role of AI technology in online mental healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and implications, a mixed-methods review (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that internet-delivered CBT may suit patients with moderate OCD symptom severity better than those with severe symptoms. The study concerns paediatric OCD and does not specifically recommend treatment for mild symptoms, so the claim extends beyond what the paper says. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lenhard et al. (2018) identified younger age of symptom onset, and duration and severity of symptoms in patients participating in eCBT for OCD as predictors of poorer treatment response with 75% to 83% accuracy.

    “Lenhard et al. (2018) identified younger age of symptom onset, and duration and severity of symptoms in patients participating in eCBT for OCD were predictors of poorer treatment response with 75% to 83% accuracy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenhard, F., Sauer, S., Andersson, E., Månsson, K. N., Mataix‐Cols, D., Rück, C., & Serlachius, E.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management (DE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lenhard, Fabian
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-28
Volume
27
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2742084467
Cited by
84
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2014‐4052)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (K2013‐61P‐22168)
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting (20120167, 20140085)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment outcome prediction, treatment response, machine learning, adolescents, predictors of treatment response, logistic regression comparison
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review