Cited by 125Digital Mental Health InterventionsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Remote treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Wootton, Bethany M., Dear, Blake F., Johnston, Luke, Terides, Matthew D., Titov, Nickolai·2013·Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.07.002

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Wootton et al. RCT, 8-week therapist-guided iCBT and therapist-guided bibliotherapy were effective compared to a waitlist control, with between-group effect sizes of d = 1.57 and d = 1.40, respectively.

    “The authors found that 8-week therapist guided iCBT (N = 17) and therapist guided bibliotherapy (bCBT; N = 20) were effective compared to a waitlist control condition (N = 19; between-group effect sizes of d = 1.57 and 1.40, respectively).”
  • Within-group effect sizes for the experimental groups in the Wootton et al. RCT were larger than those obtained by self-help versions of the same program, suggesting that therapist-assisted iCBT had stronger treatment effects.

    “The within group effect sizes for the experimental groups were larger than those obtained by self-help versions of the same program [41], suggesting that therapist assisted iCBT had stronger treatment effects.”
  • In the Wootton et al. RCT, the experimental groups were associated with a 47% (bCBT) and 39% (iCBT) reduction in OCD symptom scores, maintained at 3-month follow-up, with mean total therapist time of approximately 103 minutes for bCBT and 89 minutes for iCBT.

    “The experimental groups were associated with a 47% (bCBT) and 39% (iCBT) reduction in OCD symptoms scores, which were maintained at 3-month follow-up, with a mean total therapist time of approximately 103 minutes for bCBT and 89 minutes for iCBT.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wootton, B. M., Dear, B. F., Johnston, L., Terides, M. D., & Titov, N.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wootton, Bethany M.
Venue
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
375-384
ISSN
2211-3649 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017856974
Cited by
125
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, remote therapy, treatment accessibility, acceptability, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, waitlist control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review