Cited by 163Mental Health Treatment and AccessObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Helpseeking and access to mental health treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Goodwin, Renee, Koenen, Karestan C., Hellman, Fred, Guardino, Mary, Struening, Elmer·2002·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of helpseeking and use of mental health treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) using the behavioral model of health service use. METHOD: Data were drawn from the 1996 National Anxiety Disorders Screening Day. Participants (n=14 860) completed screening measures providing information about demographics, mental disorders, helpseeking, and treatment experiences for OCD. RESULTS: Previous use of mental health treatment was associated with comorbid panic disorder [odds ratio (OR)=1.6 (1.3-1.98)], while minority racial status [OR=0.7 (0.5-0.9)] emerged as a barrier to receiving care among individuals with OCD. Among those who had never received mental health care, comorbid panic disorder [OR=2.0 (1.5-2.8)], post-traumatic stress disorder [OR=1.7 (1.3-2.4)], and suicidal ideation [OR=1.7 (1.2-2.3)] increased readiness to seek treatment while being employed [OR=0.7 (0.5-0.9)], and feeling one could handle the problem on his/her own [OR=0.5 (0.3-0.7)] decreased readiness to seek help for the first time. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that access to treatment for OCD may not be equally accessible to all in need by revealing non-disease related factors (e.g. race, health beliefs) that have a significant impact on decisions to seek and use mental health treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.01221.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodwin, R., Koenen, K. C., Hellman, F., Guardino, M., & Struening, E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-18
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
143-149
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2146308828
Cited by
163
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, access to mental health care, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidal ideation, racial disparities, barriers to care, health beliefs, treatment readiness
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review