Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 606

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions

Warren, Steven F., Fey, Marc E., Yoder, Paul J.·2007·Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
DOI 10.1002/mrdd.20139
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research over the past 50 years has yielded several promising approaches and many specific intervention techniques designed to enhance the communication and language development of young children with intellectual and developmental delays and disabilities. Yet virtually no systematic research has been conducted on the effects of different treatment intensities. We review how intervention intensity has been defined in the literature and propose a set of terms borrowed from medicine that are intended to capture the dynamic aspects of this concept as an aid to further investigation. On the basis of this approach, we propose four types of knowledge that can be generated through the systematic study of treatment intensity and discuss appropriate methods for investigating the effects of differential treatment intensities. We conclude with three recommendations for the field. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. MRDD Research Reviews 2007;13:70–77.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrdd.20139

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 606

Metadata

Authors
Warren, S. F., Fey, M. E., & Yoder, P. J.
Venue
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
70-77
ISSN
  • 1080-4013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2779
DOI
10.1002/mrdd.20139
OpenAlex
W1966326891
Cited by
606
References
42
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.