Cited by 172Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Magnetic field changes in the human brain due to swallowing or speaking

Birn, Rasmus M., Bandettini, Peter A., Cox, Robert W., Jesmanowicz, Andrzej, Shaker, Reza·1998·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Variations in the magnetic field in the human brain caused by the processes of swallowing or speaking are measured. In both processes, motion of the pharyngeal muscles, especially the tongue and jaw, alter the susceptibility-induced magnetic field distribution at the brain slice being imaged. This leads to image warping, compromising the analysis of a time series of images, such as in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). These dynamic changes are assessed by acquiring a time series of images using a gradient-echo asymmetric-spin-echo sequence (GREASE), a technique in which two images are acquired for each excitation--one during the gradient echo, and one during the latter part of the spin echo. The NMR phase difference between the two images is a measure of the magnetic field distribution. A series of brain images, acquired with this sequence while the subject either swallows or speaks, indicated negative magnetic field changes of up to 0.087 ppm in the inferior region of the brain for both speaking and swallowing, and in some speech, additional positive changes of up to 0.056 ppm in the frontal region of the brain were indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1910400108

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birn, R. M., Bandettini, P. A., Cox, R. W., Jesmanowicz, A., & Shaker, R.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Birn, Rasmus M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-07
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
55-60
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W1973281434
Cited by
172
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ns034798-05, 5r01dc000669-09)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P01MH051358, MH 51358)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-00669)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS34798)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
swallowing, speech, magnetic field changes, tongue movement, mandibular movement, image warping, functional MRI, time series analysis
MeSH terms
Brain, Deglutition, Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Theoretical, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review