Cited by 870Cognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences

Bouchard, Thomas J., McGue, Matt·2003·Journal of Neurobiology

Abstract

Psychological researchers typically distinguish five major domains of individual differences in human behavior: cognitive abilities, personality, social attitudes, psychological interests, and psychopathology (Lubinski, 2000). In this article we: discuss a number of methodological errors commonly found in research on human individual differences; introduce a broad framework for interpreting findings from contemporary behavioral genetic studies; briefly outline the basic quantitative methods used in human behavioral genetic research; review the major criticisms of behavior genetic designs, with particular emphasis on the twin and adoption methods; describe the major or dominant theoretical scheme in each domain; and review behavioral genetic findings in all five domains. We conclude that there is now strong evidence that virtually all individual psychological differences, when reliably measured, are moderately to substantially heritable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/neu.10160

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As heritability rises, the shared environmental component of traits like intelligence tends to become insignificant.

    “As heritability rises, the shared environmental component of traits like intelligence tends to become insignificant [30,31].”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouchard, T. J., & McGue, M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Bouchard, Thomas J.
Venue
Journal of Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-16
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
4-45
ISSN
  • 0022-3034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4695
OpenAlex
W2003676727
Cited by
870
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 54
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
individual differences, heritability, behavioral genetics, twin studies, adoption studies, cognitive ability, personality, social attitudes, psychopathology, environmental influences, methodological errors
MeSH terms
Adoption, Age Factors, Attitude, Mental Disorders, Cognition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Family Relations, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence Tests, Learning, Male, Personality, Religion, Sex Characteristics, Social Environment, Statistics as Topic, Twins, Work, Twin Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review