Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophage activation by endogenous danger signals

Open access
Zhang, X, Mosser, DM·2008·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Macrophages are cells that function as a first line of defence against invading microorganisms. One of the hallmarks of macrophages is their ability to become activated in response to exogenous ‘danger signals’. Most microbes have molecular patterns (PAMPS) that are recognized by macrophages and trigger this activation response. There are many aspects of the activation response to PAMPS that are recapitulated when macrophages encounter endogenous danger signals. In response to damaged or stressed self, macrophages undergo physiological changes that include the initiation of signal transduction cascades from germline‐encoded receptors, resulting in the elaboration of chemokines, cytokines and toxic mediators. This response to endogenous mediators can enhance inflammation, and thereby contribute to autoimmune pathologies. Often the overall inflammatory response is the result of cooperative activation signals from both exogenous and endogenous signals. Macrophage activation plays a critical role, not only in the initiation of the inflammatory response but also in the resolution of this response. The clearance of granulocytes and the elaboration of anti‐inflammatory mediators by macrophages contribute to the dissolution of the inflammatory response. Thus, macrophages are a key player in the initiation, propagation and resolution of inflammation. This review summarizes our understanding of the role of macrophages in inflammation. We pay particular attention to the endogenous danger signals that macrophages may encounter and the responses that these signals induce. The molecular mechanisms responsible for these responses and the diseases that result from inappropriately controlled macrophage activation are also examined. Copyright © 2007 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.2284

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., & Mosser, D.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-27
Volume
214
Issue
2
Pages
161-178
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2076833412
Cited by
611
References
23
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.