Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Always online”: How and when task interdependence and dispositional workplace anxiety affect workplace telepressure after hours

He, Xiaoyan, Gao, Qin, Cao, Ya, Bian, Ran, Wang, Xiao‐Hua (Frank)·2024·PsyCh Journal

Abstract

Information and communication technology (ICT) provides employees with convenience in communication. However, it also creates a preoccupation with and urges to respond quickly to work‐related ICT messages during nonworking time, which is defined as workplace telepressure after hours (WTA). Drawing on the job demand–resource model, conservation of resource theory, and workplace anxiety theory, this study explores how and when task interdependence and dispositional workplace anxiety affect WTA and how individuals cope with WTA. A total of 269 full‐time workers from an online survey panel completed questionnaires at three time‐points. We found that both task interdependence and dispositional workplace anxiety are positively related to WTA. The perception of pay‐for‐responsiveness moderates the relationship between task interdependence and WTA, such that the relationship is significant only for employees with a strong perception of pay‐for‐responsiveness. Others' approval contingency of self‐worth moderates the relationship between dispositional workplace anxiety and WTA, and the relationship is significant only for employees with high degrees of others' approval contingency of self‐worth. Finally, WTA arising from external work requirements or the internal pursuit of achieving work goals prompts employees to generate responsiveness coping strategies. Overall, these findings suggest that task interdependence and dispositional workplace anxiety are important factors affecting employees' WTA and highlight the importance of being responsive to WTA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pchj.747

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.5465/amj.2014.0246 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/pere.12343 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/02683940710733115 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/smi.2864 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/smi.2668 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/apl0000362 · DOI
  7. Bolger N., 2013, Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research
  8. 10.1177/0149206307302552 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s10869-017-9508-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.5334/pb.477 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10111-019-00592-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/a0013740 · DOI
  15. Carver C. S., 2011, Handbook of self‐regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 3
  16. 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/apl0000266 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/smi.2955 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/apl0000843 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10869-006-9032-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00364.x · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1108/S1479-3555(2010)0000008011 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2307/257012 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/joop.12083 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/a0035076 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.007 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10869-023-09888-6 · DOI
  32. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000303 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104134 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00346760701668495 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/smi.2792 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.035 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/014920631452713 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.023 · DOI
  40. Heneman R. L., 1992, Merit pay: Linking pay increases to performance ratings
  41. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00651.x · DOI
  42. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1037/a0016428 · DOI
  45. 10.5093/jwop2019a2 · DOI
  46. Jex S. M., 1998, Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice
  47. 10.1037/h0055313 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.036 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/00223980.2020.1745137 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90118-6 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/h0046737 · DOI
  52. 10.1037/a0037890 · DOI
  53. 10.5465/amj.2021.0209 · DOI
  54. 10.3390/ijerph18105308 · DOI
  55. 10.1023/A:1016921920501 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.016 · DOI
  57. 10.1037/apl0000044 · DOI
  58. 10.1017/9781108649636.024 · DOI
  59. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00025-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.341 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.chbr.2021.1001101 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/jclp.10094 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/peps.12466 · DOI
  65. 10.1037/a0023594 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/job.2461 · DOI
  67. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115208 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838 · DOI
  69. 10.1080/10803548.2020.1846376 · DOI
  70. 10.3390/ijerph18030901 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.06.002 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/s41542-018-0022-8 · DOI
  73. 10.1037/apl0000355 · DOI
  74. 10.1002/job.2239 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1177/070674370505000207 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Thompson J. D., 2003, Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory
  78. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01808 · DOI
  79. 10.1177/0170840611410829 · DOI
  80. 10.1037/apl0000063 · DOI
  81. 10.1111/1748-8583.12226 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/job.2661 · DOI
  83. 10.1002/job.2012 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
He, X., Gao, Q., Cao, Y., Bian, R., & Wang, X. (.
Venue
PsyCh Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-26
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
639-653
ISSN
  • 2046-0252
  • 2046-0260
Cited by
12
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review