Cited by 89Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Project onward: an innovative e-health intervention for cancer survivors

Open access
Duffecy, Jennifer, Sanford, Stacy, Wagner, Lynne, Begale, Mark, Nawacki, Ewa, Mohr, David C.·2013·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of an Individual Internet Intervention (III) embedded and integrated into an Internet Support Group (ISG) with the ultimate goal of enhancing adherence and learning, compared with an individual internet invention alone. Method: Thirty‐one posttreatment cancer survivors were randomized in groups of seven to nine to either the 8‐week III + ISG intervention or the 8‐week III condition. Seventeen participants met the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) criteria for depressive symptoms (HADS ≥ 8). Results: Among all participants, the mean number of logins over 8 weeks was 20.8 ± 17.7 logins for the III + ISG compared with 12.5 ± 12.5 in III‐only (p = 0.15). Two participants in the III + ISG dropped out, compared with five in III (p = 0.39). Among the 17 participants with depressive symptoms at baseline, both the Onward and the III‐only condition showed large reductions in the depression scale of HADS (d = 1.27 and 0.89, respectively). Improvement over time and time x treatment effects only reached trend significance levels (p s = 0.07 & 0.12) as this pilot was not powered to detect these differences. Conclusion: Both the III + ISG and III‐only demonstrated pre‐post reductions in depressive symptoms and high rates of utilization compared with other web‐based treatments for depression. Although it is premature to make any determination as to the efficacy of the interventions tested in this feasibility study, these results indicate that pursuing the III + ISG model, as well as standard IIIs, may be fruitful areas of future research. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3075

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duffecy, J., Sanford, S., Wagner, L., Begale, M., Nawacki, E., & Mohr, D. C.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Mohr, David C.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-21
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
947-951
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1933438552
Cited by
89
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000150)
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH090318, R34MH078922)
  • National Cancer Institute (5 P30 CA60553-16, P30CA060553)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
cancer survivors, online intervention, online support groups, depressive symptoms, feasibility, acceptability, intervention adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Diffusion of Innovation, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Self-Help Groups, Socioeconomic Factors, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Survivors, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review