Cited by 86Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review

Ryan, Cathal, Bergin, Michael, Wells, John SG·2018·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the literature as this relates to theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions, drawing upon empirical evidence from the fields of psychology, business, information technology and health care.Methods A scoping review of the literature utilising principles outlined by Arksey and O'Malley was undertaken.Results Several relevant theoretical perspectives have emerged, eight of which are charted and discussed in this review. These are the Internet Intervention Model, Persuasive Systems Design, the 'PERMA' framework, the Support Accountability Model, the Model of User Engagement, the Technology Acceptance Model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of IT and the Conceptual Model of User Engagement.Conclusions The findings of the review indicate that an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating a range of technological, environmental and individual factors, may be needed in order to comprehensively explain user adherence to web-based interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12529-017-9678-8

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Beatty L, Binnion C. A systematic review of predictors of, and reasons for, adherence to online psychological interventions. Int J behav Med. 2016;23(6):776–94. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Taiwo AA, DOWNE AG. The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a meta-analytic review of empirical findings. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2013;49(1).
  3. Fogg BJ. Persuasive technologies. Commun ACM. 1999;42(5):27–9.
  4. Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity. 2002;2002:5.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins: New York; 1996.
  6. Alfonsson, S. Treatment adherence in internet-based CBT. The effects of presentation, support and motivation. PhD [dissertation]. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2016. Available from: Uppsala universitetsbibliotek.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, C., Bergin, M., & Wells, J. S.
Affiliations
Waterford Institute of Technology (IE)
Corresponding author
Ryan, Cathal
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
17-29
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W2739395822
Cited by
86
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
online intervention, adherence, theoretical approaches, persuasive system design, PERMA model, technology acceptance model, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, user engagement, e-health
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Health Behavior, Guideline Adherence, Internet, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review