Cited by 30Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Symptom distress and quality of life among Black Americans with cancer and their family caregivers

Open access
Ellis, Katrina R., Oh, Seyoung, Hecht, Hillary K., Northouse, Laurel·2021·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Black Americans are disproportionately affected by cancer and chronic diseases. Black patients with cancer and their family caregivers may concurrently experience symptoms that influence their wellbeing. This study investigates the influence of mental and physical symptom distress on quality of life (QOL) among Black Americans with cancer and their family caregivers from a dyadic perspective. Methods: One hundred and fifty‐one dyads comprised of a Black American with breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer and a Black family caregiver were included in this secondary analysis of pooled baseline data from three studies. Self‐reports of problems managing 13 symptoms were used to measure mental and physical symptom distress. Descriptive statistics and the actor‐partner interdependence model were used to examine symptom prevalence and the influence of each person's symptom distress on their own and each other's QOL. Results: Fatigue, sleep problems, pain and mental distress were prevalent. Patients and caregivers reported similar levels of mental distress; however, patients reported higher physical distress. Increased patient mental distress was associated with decreased patient QOL (overall, emotional, social, functional). Increased patient physical distress was associated with decreased patient QOL (overall, physical, emotional, functional) and decreased caregiver emotional wellbeing. Increased caregiver mental distress was associated with decreased caregiver QOL (overall, emotional, social, functional) and decreased patient overall QOL. Increased caregiver physical distress was associated with decreased caregiver QOL (overall, physical, functional), decreased patient emotional wellbeing, and better patient social wellbeing. Conclusions: Supporting symptom management in Black patient/caregiver dyads may improve their QOL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5691

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is interdependence between patient and caregiver distress.

    “We focused on NPIs that targeted both patients and caregivers, reflecting the growing body of literature regarding interdependence between patient and caregiver distress. 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 141”

    From Nonpharmacologic interventions for managing distress, anxiety, and depression for patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Results (Symptom Distress → QOL, Partner Effects; page unavailable) report that distress in one member of a Black American patient–caregiver dyad was associated with the other member’s quality of life. The Discussion calls this interdependence in their wellbeing, but the reported partner effects do not establish a direct association between patient distress and caregiver distress. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, K. R., Oh, S., Hecht, H. K., & Northouse, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • School of Social Work University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Katrina R.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-16
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1356-1365
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W3151124065
Cited by
30
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Michigan Center for Urban African American Aging Research ((No grant number))
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA046592‐S, R01CA90739, RO1CA107383)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG015281)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2R25HL126145)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
African Americans, cancer, family caregivers, symptom distress, quality of life, psychological distress, physical distress, fatigue, sleep disorders, pain, dyads, actor-partner interdependence, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, caregiver well-being
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review