Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 800

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of Electron Cryo‐microscopy and Crystallographic Data

Open access
Casañal, Ana, Lohkamp, Bernhard, Emsley, Paul·2020·Protein Science

Abstract

Coot is a tool widely used for model building, refinement, and validation of macromolecular structures. It has been extensively used for crystallography and, more recently, improvements have been introduced to aid in cryo‐EM model building and refinement, as cryo‐EM structures with resolution ranging 2.5–4 A are now routinely available. Model building into these maps can be time‐consuming and requires experience in both biochemistry and building into low‐resolution maps. To simplify and expedite the model building task, and minimize the needed expertise, new tools are being added in Coot. Some examples include morphing, Geman‐McClure restraints, full‐chain refinement, and Fourier‐model based residue‐type‐specific Ramachandran restraints. Here, we present the current state‐of‐the‐art in Coot usage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.3791

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brown A, 2015, Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo‐microscopy reconstructions, Acta Crystallogr, 71, 136
  3. 10.1107/S2052252514019290 · DOI
  4. Keating KS, 2012, RCrane: semi‐automated RNA model building, Acta Crystallogr, 68, 985
  5. Emsley P, 2017, Tools for ligand validation in Coot, Acta Crystallogr, 73, 203
  6. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1107/S0907444909042589 · DOI
  8. Nicholls RA, 2018, Current approaches for the fitting and refinement of atomic models into cryo‐EM maps using CCP‐EM, Acta Crystallogr, 74, 492
  9. Nicholls RA, 2012, Low‐resolution refinement tools in REFMAC5, Acta Crystallogr, 68, 404, 10.1107/S0108767312097632 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)82012-9 · DOI
  11. 10.7554/eLife.27131 · DOI
  12. 10.1107/S2052252518014434 · DOI
  13. Headd JJ, 2012, Use of knowledge‐based restraints in phenix.refine to improve macromolecular refinement at low resolution, Acta Crystallogr, 68, 381
  14. Headd JJ, 2014, Flexible torsion‐angle noncrystallographic symmetry restraints for improved macromolecular structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr, 70, 1346
  15. 10.1038/nature08892 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/343687a0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Croll TI, 2018, ISOLDE: A physically realistic environment for model building into low‐resolution electron‐density maps, Acta Crystallogr, 74, 519
  18. Krissinel EB, 2004, The new CCP4 coordinate library as a toolkit for the design of coordinate‐related applications in protein crystallography, Acta Crystallogr, 60, 2250
  19. 10.1016/j.str.2005.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nature07082 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/bi200346n · DOI
  22. Agirre J, 2017, Strategies for carbohydrate model building, refinement and validation, Acta Crystallogr, 73, 171
  23. 10.1038/nsmb0507-354a · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.011 · DOI
  25. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-69 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nchembio.1798 · DOI
  27. Emsley P, 2018, Structural analysis of glycoproteins: Building N‐linked glycans with coot, Acta Crystallogr, 74, 256
  28. Long F, 2017, AceDRG: A stereochemical description generator for ligands, Acta Crystallogr, 73, 112
  29. Debreczeni JÉ, 2012, Handling ligands with Coot, Acta Crystallogr, 68, 425
  30. 10.1186/1758-2946-5-24 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkw1074 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/nar/gky1033 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1021/ci7001473 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/prot.10286 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Cowtan K, 2003, The Clipper C++ libraries for X‐ray crystallography, IUCr Comput Comm Newslett, 2, 4
  36. Kleywegt GJ, 1996, Use of non‐crystallographic symmetry in protein structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr, 52, 842
  37. 10.1021/ci049780b · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1126/science.aao6535 · DOI
  39. 10.7554/eLife.33111 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Casañal, A., Lohkamp, B., & Emsley, P.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-02
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
1055-1064
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W2985720349
Cited by
800
References
7
FWCI
17.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF66‐2015)
  • FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (ERC 725685, GA‐2013‐609409)
  • Medical Research Council Canada (MC_U105184330, MC_U105192715, MC_UP_A025_1012)
  • Röntgen-Ångström Cluster (349‐2013‐597)
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • European Commission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.