Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,301

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improved prediction of protein side‐chain conformations with SCWRL4

Open access
Krivov, Georgii G., Shapovalov, Maxim V., Dunbrack, Roland L.·2009·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Determination of side‐chain conformations is an important step in protein structure prediction and protein design. Many such methods have been presented, although only a small number are in widespread use. SCWRL is one such method, and the SCWRL3 program (2003) has remained popular because of its speed, accuracy, and ease‐of‐use for the purpose of homology modeling. However, higher accuracy at comparable speed is desirable. This has been achieved in a new program SCWRL4 through: (1) a new backbone‐dependent rotamer library based on kernel density estimates; (2) averaging over samples of conformations about the positions in the rotamer library; (3) a fast anisotropic hydrogen bonding function; (4) a short‐range, soft van der Waals atom–atom interaction potential; (5) fast collision detection using k ‐discrete oriented polytopes; (6) a tree decomposition algorithm to solve the combinatorial problem; and (7) optimization of all parameters by determining the interaction graph within the crystal environment using symmetry operators of the crystallographic space group. Accuracies as a function of electron density of the side chains demonstrate that side chains with higher electron density are easier to predict than those with low‐electron density and presumed conformational disorder. For a testing set of 379 proteins, 86% of χ 1 angles and 75% of χ 1+2 angles are predicted correctly within 40° of the X‐ray positions. Among side chains with higher electron density (25–100th percentile), these numbers rise to 89 and 80%. The new program maintains its simple command‐line interface, designed for homology modeling, and is now available as a dynamic‐linked library for incorporation into other software programs. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.22488

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Krivov, G. G., Shapovalov, M. V., & Dunbrack, R. L.
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-14
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
778-795
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W2106648157
Cited by
1,301
References
0
FWCI
19.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.