The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 112 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism
Open accessAbstract
This article suggests that dynamic capabilities can give the firm competitive advantage, but this effect is contingent on the level of dynamism of the firm's external environment. A nonlinear, inverse U ‐shaped moderation is proposed, implying that the relationship between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage is strongest under intermediate levels of dynamism but comparatively weaker when dynamism is low or high. This proposition is tested using data on alliance management capability and new product development capability, two specific dynamic capabilities widely recognized in prior research. Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
6 of 112 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Other significant costs may result from wrongly estimating the need for resource alterations, which happens when firms use their dynamic capabilities when there is no compelling need for change (Winter, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the “Contrasting cost structures” passage (labeled Abstract; page not provided), Winter says that exercising a dynamic capability without a sound occasion for change can be costly. He specifically warns that attempting too much change can impose additional costs when disruption outweighs the value of the novelty achieved. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, even when environmental states appear familiar and previously successful organizational responses can be identified, this does not necessarily ensure that the same response will again and again be the most effective one (Jansen et al., 2006;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Jansen et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Conclusion (page unavailable) reports that exploiting existing products and markets can reduce financial performance in dynamic environments, supporting the point that a response need not remain effective. The paper does not examine apparently familiar environmental states or whether a previously successful response remains the best choice when those states recur. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“New product development and alliancing turned out to be among the most frequent responses.”
- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
“Fourth, in the explorative fieldwork, alliance management and new product development were the most frequently named types of routine activities for adapting organizations to changes in the environment (see the Method section).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the negative and highly significant coefficients of the two squared product terms suggest that the relationships between the two dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage vary across different levels of environmental dynamism in a quadratic manner.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the multi-group analyses (see Appendix S1) showed that the positive effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage were still statistically significant in the high dynamism subgroup.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results indicate significant differences among these settings, underlining the importance of considering the degree of environmental dynamism when making claims about performance implications of dynamic capabilities.”
- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
“They point to striking differences in the dynamic capabilities-competitive advantage relationship between settings characterized by different degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analyses indicated that the effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage are highest when environmental dynamism is moderate and comparatively lower when environmental dynamism is low or high.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed inverse U-shaped relationship between dynamic capability and competitive advantage across increasing levels of environmental dynamism is apparent in both graphs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the regression coefficient of 0.37 indicates a positive and highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) relationship between alliance management capability and competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 50
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“I received 302 usable responses, reflecting a response rate of 21.8 percent, which is consistent with comparable studies using key informant methodology (e.g., Capron and Mitchell, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Capron and Mitchell, 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In Data collection and sample (page not provided), Capron and Mitchell describe a survey of senior managers and call its 135 mail responses a reasonable number. The citation supports an example of a comparable senior-manager survey, but the paper does not establish that a 21.8% response rate is typical: it reports 135 responses from about 1,500 mailed surveys and 27 from 90 executive-education participants. The 302 responses and 21.8% rate are the citing author's own figures, not figures attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“One suggests that their effect on competitive advantage is comparatively smaller at low levels of dynamism (Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011;Helfat et al., 2007;Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002)”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “No ‘rule for riches’ here” (page unavailable), Winter argues that when opportunities for competitively significant change are sparse, the costs of dynamic capabilities may exceed their average benefits. That supports the cited position that their contribution to competitive advantage is smaller in less dynamic environments. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“I acknowledge both the cost argument (Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002), which suggests that stable environments may not provide sufficient opportunities to cover the costs of developing dynamic capabilities”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “Contrasting cost structures,” Winter says that a dynamic capability must be exercised to justify its costs; otherwise it is a cost burden. In “No ‘rule for riches’ here,” he adds that when opportunities for significant change are sparse, the added costs may not be matched by benefits. This supports the claim about stable environments. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, this study has adopted a rather narrow definition of dynamic capabilities that focuses on experience-based, rather static routines and excludes more flexible forms of organizational change (consistent with, for example, Pierce et al., 2002;Winter, 2003;Zollo and Winter, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the passages labelled “Understanding Dynamic Capabilities > Abstract” (page unavailable), Winter describes dynamic capabilities as learned, patterned change roles and distinguishes them from non-routine, opportunistic ad hoc problem solving. That distinction is consistent with the citing study’s stated choice to focus on routines rather than more flexible, ad hoc forms of change. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was considerable agreement that organizational change routines can support firms' competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Managers disagreed, however, with regard to the relative performance implications under varying degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, it is important to note that the efficacy of dynamic capabilities decreased significantly when moving from medium to high environmental dynamism, consistent with this article's argument that they exert their relatively strongest positive impact when dynamism is at intermediate levels.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, the findings presented here suggest that dynamic capabilities have more complicated performance effects than previously assumed, ranging from nonsignificant in very stable and very dynamic settings to strongly positive in moderately dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the control variables, firm size is significantly related to competitive advantage (b = 0.12; p ≤ 0.01).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four supplemental analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Another group of researchers has stressed that routine-based dynamic capabilities are not always an adequate means of change, even if there is a significant need for resource configurations (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These costs typically arise from various activities involved in devising new resources, reconfiguring existing ones, and combinations thereof.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, there are two competing views on the effect of environmental dynamism on the link between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage, with little integration of both perspectives.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One important source of concern is that the presence of dynamic capabilities has frequently been equated with environmental conditions characterized by high dynamism (Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This can create significant costs because the frequent disruption of the underlying resource base may degrade structural reproducibility and hence decrease an organization's ability to act as a reliable and accountable collective entity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Traditionally, the literature has assumed a universally positive effect of dynamic capabilities on competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece and Pisano, 1994 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These environments typically reward consistent exploitation of existing resources (Leonard-Barton, 1992;Teece, 2007), whereas constantly reconfiguring resources may disrupt the efficiency and value potential of the firm's resources.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these two capabilities are particularly representative for the dynamic capabilities concept, which makes them ideal candidates for this study.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, building and maintaining an alliance management capability usually requires substantial investments in, for example, a dedicated alliance function that oversees and supports alliance operations (Heimeriks and Duysters, 2007;Helfat et al., 2007;Kale, Dyer, and Singh, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Matching unfamiliar situations with organizational changes proves difficult and may lead either to unresponsiveness or normalization and, in turn, implementation of inappropriate responses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Organizations with a strong alliance management capability possess routines that support various alliance-related tasks, such as partner identification and interorganizational learning, that facilitate an effective execution of 184 O. Schilke interfirm relationships (Schilke and Goerzen, 2010;Schreiner, Kale, and Corsten, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More specifically, contexts where change is frequent and 182 O. Schilke unpredictable and the environment shifts uncertainly among states that place novel demands on the organization produce two kinds of problems for dynamic capabilities, the first of which I call a 'matching problem' and the second an 'inertia problem.'”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I expect that when environmental dynamism is high, dynamic capabilities may also have a relatively weak impact on the competitive advantage of firms.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While supporting the institutionalization of alliance management capability, such investments are typically associated with nontrivial costs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, I recognize that environmental dynamism affects both the extent of opportunities to change and the organizational capacity to exploit these opportunities via routine-based change, thus acknowledging the validity of the arguments from both research camps.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When environmental dynamism is at the intermediate level, there is both a potential for organizational change and the capacity to make good use of the routinized practices that underlie dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, I expect the positive effect of dynamic capabilities first to increase but then to diminish as environmental dynamism continues to rise, eventually declining at high levels of dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“First, strategic alliances and new product development are essential means for reconfiguring the organizational resource base.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Terjesen, Patel, and Covin (2011), for example, report significant positive associations between environmental dynamism and alliance partner diversity as well as alliance geographic diversity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Terjesen, Patel, and Covin, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These environments are dynamic enough to create opportunities for change but stable enough for organizations to recognize reoccurring problem structures and successfully leverage solutions existing in organizational memory.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, I expect that dynamic capabilities have the relatively strongest positive effect on the On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities 183 competitive advantage of firms when environmental dynamism is intermediate.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although highly dynamic environments provide ample opportunities for resource reconfigurations, the high frequency of novel situations and the necessity to bring about discontinuous organizational change in these settings make the routinebased mechanisms dynamic capabilities rest on comparatively less appropriate, given the matching and inertia problems associated with them.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Given the absence of relevant stimulus knowledge, an out-of-family state may either be ignored or become normalized-that is, treated as if it were a familiar event already encountered and understood in the past-, and potentially inappropriate organizational responses may in turn be matched to these normalized situations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Weick and Sutcliffe, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extant empirical literature finds that alliance management capability tends to be positively related to performance (see Sluyts et al., 2011 for a recent review).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sluyts et al., 2011 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Following a patterned stimulus-response logic, they match particular environmental states with certain avenues for organizational change (Levinthal, 2000;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Levinthal, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“When possible, survey information obtained from the key informant in the main study was triangulated with complementary data sources to establish its accuracy (Homburg et al., 2012), as described below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Homburg et al., 2012 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, when environmental dynamism is at an intermediate level, there is a potential for repeated new product launches that make investments in capability development worthwhile and firms also have the capacity to utilize effectively experiencebased new product development routines to create new, successful products that build on existing solutions.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Firm age has been suggested to influence a firm's competitive advantage (Zahra, Ireland, and Hitt, 2000) as well as the extent of patterned forms of behavior that underpin dynamic capabilities (Helfat and Peteraf, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is commonly assumed that such routines lead to new product innovations that in turn result in competitive advantage (Lawson and Samson, 2001).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lawson and Samson, 2001 source
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In line with Zott and Amit (2008), I controlled for the breadth of the firm's product offering and targeted market, as these are key dimensions of a firm's strategy that may affect its competitive advantage and capability development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zott and Amit, 2008 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, 73.5 percent of the participants in the final dataset had been with their current firm for six years or longer (see Table 1).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Similar to my discussion of alliance management capability, it is important to note that a new product development capability usually entails durable commitment of funds-e.g., to support skilled personnel, specialized facilities, and stateof-the-art equipment (Helfat et al., 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“I found significant associations for growth in sales revenues (r = 0.32, p ≤ 0.01), number of employees (r = 0.28, p ≤ 0.001), and accounting value of assets (r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.001), which lends further credibility to the perceptual competitive advantage measure.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Following the recommendations of DeVellis (2003), the questionnaire items were further refined through in-depth interviews with 13 managers (described above), an item sorting pretest based on Anderson and Gerbing (1991) administered to 15 scholars, and a pretest of the questionnaire conducted with 21 managers.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites DeVellis, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anderson and Gerbing, 1991 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Long known as a best-in-class 'new product machine' with highly professionalized innovation routines that allowed for continuously and quickly bringing a large number of products to the market, the firm began to struggle when the environment was beginning to change drastically in the early 1990s.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the moderately dynamic 186 O. Schilke mainframe sector, for example, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi (1995) find the capability's underlying routines to substantially enhance predictability and effectiveness by coordinating the entire new product development process from initial specification through manufacturing ramp-up whereas such routines were less beneficial in the more dynamic personal computing”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Eisenhardt and Tabrizi, 1995 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Also, firms with strong alliance management capability tend to follow established partner selection protocols (Heimeriks, 2010) and tend to engage in social bonding with their partners (Schreiner et al., 2009), both of which favor repeated ties with the same portfolio of alliance partners.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The values obtained indicate reliable and valid measures of the individual constructs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measurement properties of constructs
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“My objectives were to establish temporal order of the independent variables (preceding in time) to the dependent variables to enhance causal inference (Biddle, Slavings, and Anderson, 1985) as well as to allow time for the performance effects of dynamic capabilities to materialize (Zahra et al., 2006: 947) and also to reduce the threat of a potential common method bias that could have been present”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“While this sample size may not be considered very large, it is much in line with sample sizes in other strategy studies (Phelan, Ferreira, and Salvador, 2002) and exceeds common recommendations for advanced statistical analyses (e.g., MacCallum et al., 1999).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.20, which clearly exceeds the common 0.1 threshold.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The importance of the industry in which a firm competes as a predictor of firm-level variables is widely recognized in the literature (Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, Clark and Fujimoto (1990) find that investing in specialized coordination committees promotes routinized product development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark and Fujimoto, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Environmental dynamism refers to the volatility and unpredictability of the firm's external environment (Miller and Friesen, 1983).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller and Friesen, 1983 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.24, which clearly exceeded Bliese's (1998) 0.1 cutoff.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bliese, 1998 source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“I used the measure developed by Schilke and Goerzen (2010), which suggests a five-dimensional, second-order structure of the construct, with the underlying dimensions of (1) interorganizational coordination; (2) alliance portfolio coordination; (3) interorganizational learning; (4) alliance proactiveness; and (5) alliance transformation.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schilke and Goerzen, 2010 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At intermediate levels of dynamism, finally, I expect a balance to exist between firms' ability to leverage their alliance management investments and to effectively exploit their experience-based alliance management routines.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these settings, alliances are frequent enough to justify the costs of developing alliance management capability, and environmental states are similar enough to pursue alliance management in a routinized fashion that strongly builds on past experiences and to make effective use of similar types of alliances.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, although this dataset included a broad range of manufacturing firms representing a variety of industries, care should be exercised in generalizing the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, both dynamic capabilities have a positive relationship with competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dynamism could alter the fabric of the industry and cause the decay of the firm's resources or render them strategically irrelevant.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of managerial implications, the results suggest that investments in building dynamic capabilities (such as alliance management capability and new product development capability) are strategically justified in many firm environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though some of the routines develop accidentally, others require managers' patient investments and foresight in deciding where and how to build these capabilities as well as how to deploy them to achieve a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, this study thus helps reduce ambiguities regarding the role of environmental dynamism in the dynamic capabilities framework (Zahra et al., 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study's empirical findings help clarify a key contingency that influences the efficacy of dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“First, and most importantly, measures of the dependent variable were collected in a separate survey (Podsakoff and Organ, 1986).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Podsakoff and Organ, 1986 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted, dynamic capabilities reconfigure a firm's resource base, and managers need to pay attention to building and exploiting these capabilities in ways that generate a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid and that the interaction among dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage may be more complex than a simple linear relationship considered by earlier work (e.g., Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the fact that the sample consists of both firms and business units may be viewed as a limitation, I control for this issue in the empirical analysis as described further below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“while the other raises doubts about their effectiveness in highly dynamic environments (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The results of the multi-group analyses lent further support to the hypotheses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Byrne, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“It suggests a less extreme position in that these capabilities can be strategically valuable even in high velocity environments, possibly because an inventory of established change repertories can indirectly facilitate novel action by providing the fodder for new recombinations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Wirtz, Mathieu, and Schilke, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interactions were positive up to the median and then became negative, in line with Hypotheses 1 and 2”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
“Consistent with this conceptualization, superior firm performance relative to rivals commonly serves as an empirical indicator of competitive advantage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In highly dynamic environments, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.
“In highly dynamic environments, on the other hand, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The chemicals, machinery, and motor vehicle industries provide a wide variance in environmental dynamism.
“in order to capture a wide variance in the moderating variable environmental dynamism”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ED is a key factor in DC theory (see Schilke, 2014), which suggests that the differential effects of dynamic capabilities on organisational performance (see Helfat and Winter, 2011; Chen et al., 2015) are contingent on the level of dynamism of the organisation's external environment (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000).”
In the citing paper
“The development of this theory is useful to explain how the dynamic capabilities of the organisation may provide value (Aragón -Correa and Sharma, 2003; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Although the dynamic capabilities view has been increasingly used as one of the most important theoretical lenses, the theory has been criticized by some scholars due to poorly defined boundary conditions and its confounding discussion of the effect of dynamic capabilities (e.g., Arend and Bromiley, 2009; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Following Schilke's (2014) arguments, dynamic capabilities have differential performance effects in very stable and very dynamic settings and strongly positive ones in moderately dynamic environments.”
From Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations (2020) · cites this paper as Schilke's (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Discussion reverses the stated moderation shape
MinorThe discussion calls the proposed moderation U-shaped, while the paper repeatedly describes and tests an inverse U-shaped moderation. Those shapes have opposite implications for where the capability effect is strongest.
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid”
“I propose a novel inverse U-shaped moderating effect”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,759
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Arbuckle JL, 2007, Amos 16.0 User's Guide
- Centre for European Economic Research, 2004, ZEW Sector Reports on Innovation 2003
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 · DOI
- Pierce JL, 2002, The Economics of Change, Choice and Structure: Essays in the Memory of Richard M. Cyert, 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,252
Kamaşak, R., Yavuz, M., & Altuntaş, G. (2016) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-016-0032-9 · Cited by 69
“…helped to the efforts of researchers to have a clearer understanding about the two somewhat contradictory positions that exist in the strategic management literature with respect to the value of dynamic capabilities under different levels of ED (Schilke 2014) through providing new evidence.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNetwork management in emergent high-tech business contexts: Critical capabilities and activities
Nordin, F., Ravald, A., Möller, K., et al. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.024 · Cited by 64
Gahan, P. G., Theilacker, M., Adamovic, M., Choi, D., Harley, B., Healy, J., & Olsen, J. E. (2020) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12316 · Cited by 71
Degener, P., Maurer, I., & Bort, S. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12396 · Cited by 62
Strategic organization, dynamic capabilities, and the external environment
Helfat, C. E. (2022) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270221115377 · Cited by 70
Gutiérrez, L., Lameijer, B. A., Anand, G., Antony, J., & Vijaya Sunder, M. (2022) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2022-0086 · Cited by 71
“DCs are positioned as higher-order capabilities for modifying operating routines (Zollo and Winter, 2002) and sustaining competitive advantage across changing environments (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000; Schilke, 2014; Teece et al. , 1997).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialZhou, J., Xu, T., Chiao, Y., & Fang, Y. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2023.1210 · Cited by 69
“Applying proven responses can thus be more effective in managing changes than exploiting new information or synchronizing behaviors with partners (Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundTowards an understanding of the nature of dynamic capabilities in high-velocity markets of China
Li, S., Easterby‐Smith, M., & Hong, J. F. L. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.007 · Cited by 69
“…demand, industry growth, regulation, business models, and marketing practices (Drnevich & Kriauciunas, 2011; Li & Liu, 2014; Mikalef & Pateli, 2017; Schilke, 2014; Wilden & Gudergan, 2015; Wu, 2010), which often results in incomplete, inaccurate, unavailable, or obsolete information and hence a…”
BackgroundInfluentialHow and when social media affects innovation in start-ups. A moderated mediation model
de Zubielqui, G. C., & Jones, J. T. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.006 · Cited by 72
Short-term versus long-term benefits: Balanced sustainability framework and research propositions
Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D.-A., Liu, C., & Pawar, K. S. (2016) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2016.09.003 · Cited by 68
Sustainable electronic human resource management systems and firm performance: an empirical study
Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Pretorius, J. H. C., Chowdhury, A. H., & Giannakis, M. (2021) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-02-2021-0099 · Cited by 79
Biesenthal, C., Gudergan, S. P., & Ambrosini, V. (2018) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.006 · Cited by 62
The effects of supply chain finance on organizational performance: a moderated and mediated model
Nguema, J.-N. B. B., Bi, G., Akenroye, T. O., & Baz, J. E. (2021) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2020-0223 · Cited by 59
On the edge of Big Data: Drivers and barriers to data analytics adoption in SMEs
Justy, T., Pellegrin‐Boucher, E., Lescop, D., Granata, J., & Gupta, S. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102850 · Cited by 86
Le, T. T., & Behl, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3348274 · Cited by 72
Sicotte, H., Drouin, N., & Delerue, H. (2014) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21456 · Cited by 60
Savastano, M., Cucari, N., Dentale, F., & Ginsberg, A. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-07-2021-0267 · Cited by 60
Dynamic capabilities in tourism businesses: antecedents and outcomes
Nguyen, H. T. T., Pham, H. S. T., & Freeman, S. (2022) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00567-z · Cited by 86
Vrontis, D., El-Chaarani, H., Abiad, Z. E., Nemar, S. E., & Haddad, A. Y. (2021) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-02-2021-0045 · Cited by 63
Marrucci, A., Rialti, R., & Balzano, M. (2023) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2022-0644 · Cited by 66
Nayal, K., Raut, R. D., de Queiroz, M. M., & Priyadarshinee, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3266151 · Cited by 61
Musa, S., & Enggarsyah, D. T. P. (2024) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-10-2023-0265 · Cited by 72
Environmental dynamism, hostility, and dynamic capabilities in medium-sized enterprises
Frank, H., Güttel, W. H., & Keßler, A. (2017) · The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation · doi:10.1177/1465750317723219 · Cited by 65
“Studies from Girod and Whittington (2017), Li and Liu (2014), and Schilke (2014) provide first empirical evidence that the firm’s environment impacts DC and performance.”
BackgroundInfluentialAgrawal, R., Samadhiya, A., Banaitis, A., & Kumar, A. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-11-2023-2032 · Cited by 56
Zhang, F., Chen, J., & Zhu, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3046711 · Cited by 64
Yunita, T., Sasmoko, S., Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14817 · Cited by 70
Sigalas, C., & Papadakis, V. M. (2018) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-01-2017-0010 · Cited by 61
Decoding digital transformational outsourcing: The role of service providers’ capabilities
Mazumder, S., & Garg, S. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102295 · Cited by 69
Donbesuur, F., Owusu-Yirenkyi, D., Ampong, G. O. A., & Hultman, M. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113467 · Cited by 58
Dynamic marketing capability – refining the concept and applying it to company innovations
Mitręga, M. (2019) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-01-2019-0007 · Cited by 57
Saldanha, T. J. V., Lee, D., & Mithas, S. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0944 · Cited by 62
Idrees, H., Xu, J., Avotra, A. A. R. N., & Kadyrova, M. (2023) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-12-2022-0639 · Cited by 55
Weimann, V., Gerken, M., & Hülsbeck, M. (2019) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-019-00958-x · Cited by 57
“If this is not the case, family influence and a potentially accompanied market caution may weaken the relationship between the firm’s sensing and seizing capabilities and BM changes that can be expensive and associated with external financing (Schilke 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialKnowledge management capability, environmental dynamism and innovation strategy in Malaysian firms
Taghizadeh, S. K., Karini, A., Nadarajah, G., & Nikbin, D. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2020-0051 · Cited by 59
Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. (2021) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1177/1069031x20988260 · Cited by 51
“Researchers nonetheless recognize that environmental-level contingencies can affect company performance (see Barney 2001; Cadogan, Kuivalainen, and Sundqvist 2009; Priem and Butler 2001; Schilke 2014).”
BackgroundMin, S., & Kim, J. (2021) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.004 · Cited by 62
Forliano, C., Ferraris, A., Bivona, E., & Couturier, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.065 · Cited by 53
The future of marketing analytics in the sharing economy
Akter, S., Hani, U., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Sharma, A. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.008 · Cited by 61
Pfajfar, G., Mitręga, M., & Shoham, A. (2023) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/imr-12-2022-0276 · Cited by 70
Supply chain flexibility concepts, dimensions and outcomes: an organisational capability perspective
Huo, B., Gu, M., & Wang, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1456694 · Cited by 60
“Second, we obtained information on the number of employees, fixed assets, region, ownership and company age from the websites of the non-response companies and compared the values with those of the responding companies (Schilke 2014).”
ResultHernández‐Linares, R., Fernández, M. C. L., García‐Piqueres, G., Cunha, M. P. E., & Rego, A. (2023) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-023-00691-4 · Cited by 71
“Second, given that larger firms may dedicate more resources to developing their change routines (Schilke 2014b) and access to external resources more easily than smaller firms, which may affect firm performance (Zahra and Nielsen 2002), we controlled for firm size, measured as the logarithm of the…”
Sun, W., & Ding, Z. (2020) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650320928544 · Cited by 50
“The literature notes that environmental dynamism has been widely recognized as a powerful moderator that changes the strength and direction of the influences of firm strategic elements such as management competency, new product capability, or social activities (Goll & Rasheed, 2004; Hough & White, 2003; Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundThe impact of chief risk officer appointments on firm risk and operational efficiency
Li, H., Lam, H. K. S., Ho, W., et al. (2022) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1175 · Cited by 50
Saeed, M., Adıgüzel, Z., Shafique, I., Kalyar, M. N., & Abrudan, D. (2023) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-01-2023-0015 · Cited by 57
Hsiao, Y., & Hsu, Z.-X. (2018) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.009 · Cited by 52
Cross-cultural collaboration for inclusive global value chain: a case study of rattan industry
Pratono, A. H. (2019) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-01-2017-0028 · Cited by 50
Mavroudi, E., Kesidou, E., & Pandža, K. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.056 · Cited by 49
“First, R&D intensive industries are technologically dynamic (Schilke, 2014).”
Background(When) Are Dynamic Capabilities Routine? A Mixed‐Methods Configurational Analysis
Wilhelm, H., Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12789 · Cited by 51
Laguir, I., Modgil, S., Bose, I., Gupta, S., & Stekelorum, R. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04484-4 · Cited by 53
“DCV also cannot be used to categorise the right mix of options that may make organizational capabilities much more respectable (Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundLin, J., Wu, S., & Luo, X. R. (2024) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2024.2375262 · Cited by 61
“…these indexes of environmental dynamism, we regressed sales and operating income for a period of five years (i.e., 2018–2022) prior to the survey on a variable representing the period and then divided the standard errors of the regression by the mean level of the dependent variable (Schilke, 2014).”
InfluentialDynamic capabilities of logistics service providers: antecedents and performance implications
Chen, I. S. N., Fung, P. K. O., & Yuen, S. S. M. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-12-2017-0308 · Cited by 50
Dubey, R., Bryde, D., Graham, G., Foropon, C. R. H., Kumari, S., & Gupta, O. K. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04390-9 · Cited by 55
“We controlled the breadth of the firm’s product offerings and target market, as key dimensions that may affect the competitive advantage of the firm (Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialWhen and why technology leadership enters the C-suite: An antecedents perspective on CIO presence
Bendig, D., Wagner, R., Jung, C., & Nüesch, S. (2022) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101705 · Cited by 48
Greven, A., Kruse, S., Vos, A., Strese, S., & Brettel, M. (2022) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12886 · Cited by 51
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Kadić‐Maglajlić, S. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.12.014 · Cited by 67
Kafouros, M. I., Aliyev, M., Piperopoulos, P., Au, A. K. M., Ho, J., & Wong, S. Y. N. (2023) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1479 · Cited by 58
Javed, A., Li, Q., & Basit, A. (2024) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-08-2024-0437 · Cited by 49
Materializing Innovation Capability: A Management Control Perspective
Grabner, I., Posch, A., & Wabnegg, M. (2018) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-52062 · Cited by 43
Mostafiz, M. I., Sambasivan, M., & Goh, S. K. (2019) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-09-2018-0263 · Cited by 47
Wang, M., & Liu, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894766 · Cited by 48
“Following prior research (e.g., Katsikeas et al., 2006; Schilke, 2014; Park and Xiao, 2020), we measured firm performance by asking the firms to assess their profitability, net profit margin, profitability growth, sales performance, and overall firm performance compared with those of their industry…”
ResultBechtel, J., Kaufmann, C., & Kock, A. (2023) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102469 · Cited by 81
Alliance Portfolio Management: Dimensions and Performance
Castro, I., & Roldán, J. L. (2015) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12042 · Cited by 48
“It would likewise be of interest to introduce contextual variables such as environmental dynamism, to analyze how those variables influence the effectiveness of alliance portfolio management capability on portfolio performance (Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundAre quality management practices enough to improve process innovation?
Zornoza, C. C., & Puig‐Denia, A. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1113326 · Cited by 47
“…act as a moderator in the relationship between technological and learning capability and process innovation performance, following the proposals of Schilke (2014), who suggests that the effect of dynamic capabilities on firm competitive advantage is contingent on the level of dynamism of the…”
BackgroundZeng, J., & Glaister, K. W. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12136 · Cited by 48
An empirical investigation of the antecedents and performance outcomes of export innovativeness
Makri, K., Theodosiou, M., & Katsikea, E. S. (2016) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.004 · Cited by 46
It’s in the Mix: How Firms Configure Resource Mobilization for New Product Success
Thornton, S. C., Henneberg, S. C. M., Leischnig, A., & Naudé, P. (2019) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12489 · Cited by 47
“the most significant ones, as indicated by multiple studies on the topic (e.g., Jansen et al., 2006; Schilke, 2014; Wang and Li, 2008).”
BackgroundEndres, H., Helm, R., & Dowling, M. J. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.004 · Cited by 51
Mehrabi, H., Coviello, N. E., & Ranaweera, C. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.057 · Cited by 46
Ruiz‐Ortega, M. J., Villaverde, P. M. G., la Gala‐Velásquez, B. D., Hurtado‐Palomino, A., & Arredondo-Salas, Á. Y. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.012 · Cited by 52
Discovering the evolution of resource-based theory: Science mapping based on bibliometric analysis
Zhang, Y., Hou, Z., Yang, F., Yang, M. M., & Wang, Z.-L. (2021) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.055 · Cited by 42
Capability Stretching in Product Innovation
Wang, T., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315594847 · Cited by 45
“New product development capability is a dynamic capability that enables firms to introduce new products to the market and reconfigure their product portfolios, with the aim of improving their product market performance (Brown & Eisenhardt, 1995, 1997; Eisenhardt & Tabrizi, 1995; Schilke, 2014).”
Organizational Search, Dynamic Capability, and Business Model Innovation
Jie, Z., Wei, Z., & Yang, D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2914275 · Cited by 47
“Dynamic capability may also increase costs because reconfigurations of resources unnecessarily disrupt ongoing activities or wrongly estimate the need for resource alterations [19].”
BackgroundContinuous improvement initiatives for dynamic capabilities development
Gutiérrez, L., & Antony, J. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-07-2018-0071 · Cited by 45
Patterns of IT use: the impact on green supply chain management and firm performance
Jiang, S., Han, Z., & Huo, B. (2020) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-07-2019-0394 · Cited by 45
Chaubey, A., & Sahoo, C. K. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102344 · Cited by 48
Tiwari, S., Sharma, P., & Jha, A. K. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109063 · Cited by 54
Xu, Y., Ji, J., Qiao, Y., & Huang, J. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103294 · Cited by 58
Mahmud, M., Soetanto, D. P., & Jack, S. L. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121633 · Cited by 44
“Transformative capability (α=.95) was measured with an existing 5-item scale from Gibson and Birkinshaw (2004) and Schilke (2014).”
MethodThe influence of digitalization on SMEs’ OFDI in emerging countries
Qiao, P., Chang, M., & Zeng, Y. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114633 · Cited by 50
Overcoming path-dependent dynamic capabilities
Keller, A., Konlechner, S. W., Güttel, W. H., & Reischauer, G. (2022) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270221125807 · Cited by 56
“First, we argue that overcoming path dependence requires an exogenous intervention in which a higher-level entity, unaffected by the mechanisms, acts upon the path-constituting, self-reinforcing mechanisms.”
InfluentialTiwari, M., Bryde, D. J., Stavropoulou, F., & Malhotra, G. (2024) · International Studies of Management & Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.2024.2324245 · Cited by 44
“…are often considered crucial while evaluating the extent to which resources or capabilities can generate competitive advantage, especially in the context of the identification of resources and capabilities and their implementation (Sousa and Voss 2008; Prashant and Harbir 2009; Schilke 2014).”
Fan, Z., Long, R., & Shen, Z. (2024) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106846 · Cited by 47
Zhao, J., Wu, G., Xi, X., Na, Q., & Liu, W. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.001 · Cited by 42
Arora, S. K., Li, Y., Youtie, J., & Philip Shapira, A. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09751-y · Cited by 44
“First-order capabilities can be contrasted with ordinary capabilities, which enable operations and recurring (present) revenue streams, and second-order dynamic capabilities, which help firms “learn how to learn” (Schilke 2014b).”
BackgroundThe impact of IT application on supply chain learning and service performance
Huo, B., Haq, M. Z. U., & Gu, M. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-10-2018-0476 · Cited by 44
Distel, A. P., Sofka, W., de Faria, P., Preto, M. T., & Ribeiro, A. S. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00274-0 · Cited by 43
“Following Dess and Beard (1984) and Schilke (2014), we measure host-country dynamism by regressing sales for each industry for a period of 2 years prior to the focal year on a variable representing the time period, dividing the standard errors of the regression by the mean level of the dependent…”
BackgroundDehnert, M. (2020) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00136-8 · Cited by 48
Zhang, F., Lyu, C., & Zhu, L. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2019-0756 · Cited by 41
Kusa, R., Suder, M., Barbosa, B., Glinka, B., & Duda, J. (2022) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-022-00812-7 · Cited by 51
Innovation, digital technologies, and sales growth during exogenous shocks
Ganotakis, P., Angelidou, S., Saridakis, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Dindial, M. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122656 · Cited by 41
Hossain, M. I., Talapatra, S., Saha, P., & Belal, H. M. (2024) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-024-00424-w · Cited by 52
Sustainability and scalability of university spinouts: a business model perspective
Bigdeli, A. Z., Li, F., & Shi, X. (2015) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12167 · Cited by 41
“…model as a tool to address the transformation and evolution of an organization, or the business model itself, over time, focusing on the interactions among the core BM components of the specific organization under study (e.g. Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart 2010, Schilke 2014, Moyon and Lecocq 2014).”
Dynamic capabilities: towards an organizing framework
Mohamud, M., & Sarpong, D. (2016) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-11-2015-0088 · Cited by 44
Managing asset orchestration: A processual approach to adapting to dynamic environments
Schriber, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.027 · Cited by 42
Firm performance and marketing analytics in the Chinese context: A contingency model
Liang, X., Li, G., Zhang, H., Nolan, E., & Chen, F. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.061 · Cited by 55
Digitalization trends and organizational structure: bureaucracy, ambidexterity or post-bureaucracy?
Mustafa, G., Solli-Sæther, H., Bodolica, V., Håvold, J., & Ilyas, A. (2022) · Eurasian Business Review · doi:10.1007/s40821-021-00196-8 · Cited by 42
“Although ambidexterity has found some support under dynamic circumstances (Bodolica & Spraggon, 2021), many authors suggest that organizing in this manner is less useful for adequately predicting technological changes in the environment (Khan & Mir, 2019; Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodTekala, K., Baradarani, S., Alzubi, A., & Berberoğlu, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16135291 · Cited by 41
“The literature suggests that high environmental dynamism creates challenges for maintaining stable operations as firms in dynamic environments need greater flexibility and adaptability [40], and environmental dynamism can impact the effectiveness of sustainable practices [41].”
BackgroundOpen for business: Towards an interactive view on dynamic capabilities
Qiu, X., Holmén, E., Havenvid, M. I., de Boer, L., & Hermundsdottir, F. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.027 · Cited by 54
Bag, S., Gupta, S., Chan, H., & Kumar, A. (2024) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103625 · Cited by 45
Market Dynamics and Innovation Management on Performance in SMEs: Multi-agent Simulation Approach
Seo, Y. W., & Chae, S. W. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.060 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilke, O.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schilke, Oliver
- ORCID
- Schilke, Oliver
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-203
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1853999331
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 126.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- dynamic capabilities, competitive advantage, environmental dynamism, inverted U-shaped relationship, alliance management capability, new product development capability, external environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
