Cited by 59Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsBirth, Development, and Health

Which ultrasound or biochemical markers are independent predictors of small‐for‐gestational age?

Law, L. W., Leung, T. Y., Sahota, D. S., Chan, L. W., Fung, T. Y., Lau, T. K.·2009·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate which ultrasound or biochemical markers in both the first and the second trimesters are the best predictors for fetal growth and small‐for‐gestational age (SGA). Methods: This was a prospective study of 619 Chinese women with a singleton pregnancy. At 11 to 13 + 6 weeks, fetal crown–rump length (CRL), placental volume (PlaV), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI), and the maternal serum levels of pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A) and free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin (β‐hCG) were measured. Fetal biparietal diameter, femur length, abdominal and head circumference, PlaV and UtA‐PI were then measured at 18–22 weeks. All markers were transformed to gestational age‐specific Z‐scores or multiples of the median (MoM). Birth weights were also transformed to Z‐scores using the individualized gestational age‐related optimal weight based on a locally derived nomogram. The relationship between all markers and the customized birth weight were examined, and their predictive powers for SGA were examined by regression analysis. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that all markers except free β‐hCG correlated with birth weight Z‐score. After multiple linear regression analysis, only PlaV, UtA‐PI and CRL in the first trimester, and PlaV and UtA‐PI in the second trimester, stood out as independent markers. Logistic regression analysis showed that PlaV was the only independent first‐trimester predictor of SGA, and in the second trimester both PlaV and UtA‐PI were independent predictors. The sensitivity of these first‐ and second‐trimester markers in predicting SGA were 41% and 45%, respectively, at a false‐positive rate of 20%. Combining them did not significantly improve prediction of SGA. Conclusions: Among the various known ultrasound and biochemical markers, only the first‐trimester PlaV and the second‐trimester PlaV plus UtA‐PI are independent predictors for SGA. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.6455

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First trimester placental volume has long been known to correlate with birth weight at term.

    “First trimester placental volume (PlVol) has long been known to correlate with birth weight at term (7-9), and it was suggested as early as 1981 that PlVol measured with B-mode ultrasound could be used to screen for growth restriction (10).”
  • PlVol has been demonstrated to be independent of other biomarkers for SGA, such as PAPP-A and nuchal translucency.

    “As PlVol has also been demonstrated to be independent of other biomarkers for SGA, such as pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) (8, 11) and nuchal translucency (11), a recent systematic review concluded that it could be successfully integrated into a future multivariable screening method for SGA (12) analogous to the 'combined test' currently used to screen for fetal aneuploidy.”
  • First trimester placental volume and vascularity are linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes including FGR and pre-eclampsia.

    “Both the volume and vascularity of the first trimester placenta has been demonstrated to be linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes including FGR and pre-eclampsia.”
  • Low placental volume (PlaV) at 11-13 weeks is associated with SGA/FGR and pre-eclampsia, independent of PAPP-A and nuchal translucency measurements.

    “It has now been shown that low placental volume (PlaV) at 11–13 weeks is associated with SGA/FGR [23, 26–28] and pre-eclampsia [28, 29], and that this is independent of PAPP-A and nuchal translucency (NT) measurements [27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, L. W., Leung, T. Y., Sahota, D. S., Chan, L. W., Fung, T. Y., & Lau, T. K.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Law, L. W.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-10
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
283-287
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2033643158
Cited by
59
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
small for gestational age, fetal growth prediction, placental volume, uterine artery pulsatility index, crown-rump length, first-trimester markers, PAPP-A, free beta-hCG, birth weight, singleton pregnancy
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Longitudinal Studies, Organ Size, Placenta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review