Cited by 104Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Model-based approaches to neuroimaging: combining reinforcement learning theory with fMRI data

Gläscher, Jan P., O'Doherty, John P.·2010·WIREs Cognitive Science

Abstract

The combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with computational models for a given cognitive process provides a powerful framework for testing hypotheses about the neural computations underlying such processes in the brain. Here, we outline the steps involved in implementing this approach with reference to the application of reinforcement learning (RL) models that can account for human choice behavior during value‐based decision making. The model generates internal variables which can be used to construct fMRI predictor variables and regressed against individual subjects' fMRI data. The resulting regression coefficients reflect the strength of the correlation with blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activity and the relevant internal variables from the model. In the second part of this review, we describe human neuroimaging studies that have employed this analysis strategy to identify brain regions involved in the computations mediating reward‐related decision making. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Cognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcs.57

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trial-by-trial estimates of computational quantities, such as prediction errors or precisions, can be used as parametric modulators in a general linear model of fMRI data, an approach commonly referred to as model-based fMRI.

    “For example, trial-by-trial estimates of computational quantities, such as prediction errors or precisions, can be used as parametric modulators in a general linear model (GLM) of fMRI data, an approach commonly referred to as “model-based fMRI” (114).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gläscher, J. P., & O'Doherty, J. P.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
WIREs Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-02
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
501-510
ISSN
  • 1939-5078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5086
OpenAlex
W2016473481
Cited by
104
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
reinforcement learning models, value-based decision making, computational psychiatry, BOLD signal, internal variables, neural computation, choice behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review