Cited by 925Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Animal Learning Development

Associative learning of social value

Open access
Behrens, Timothy E. J., Hunt, Laurence T., Woolrich, Mark W., Rushworth, Matthew F. S.·2008·Nature

Abstract

Our decisions are guided by information learnt from our environment. This information may come via personal experiences of reward, but also from the behaviour of social partners. Social learning is widely held to be distinct from other forms of learning in its mechanism and neural implementation; it is often assumed to compete with simpler mechanisms, such as reward-based associative learning, to drive behaviour. Recently, neural signals have been observed during social exchange reminiscent of signals seen in studies of associative learning. Here we demonstrate that social information may be acquired using the same associative processes assumed to underlie reward-based learning. We find that key computational variables for learning in the social and reward domains are processed in a similar fashion, but in parallel neural processing streams. Two neighbouring divisions of the anterior cingulate cortex were central to learning about social and reward-based information, and for determining the extent to which each source of information guides behaviour. When making a decision, however, the information learnt using these parallel streams was combined within ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These findings suggest that human social valuation can be realized by means of the same associative processes previously established for learning other, simpler, features of the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07538

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational studies of reward and punishment decision-making show that people adjust how quickly they learn action-outcome contingencies when environmental volatility changes.

    “While computational studies of decision-making about rewards and punishments show that participants adapt their rate of learning about action-outcome contingencies in response to changes in environmental volatility 8–10”

    From Adults with autism overestimate the volatility of the sensory environment (2017) · cites this paper as [10]

    The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) says the optimal learning rate depends on volatility: faster in volatile conditions and slower in stable ones. It also reports that participants used model-tracked reward information in their choices. The study concerns reward outcomes and social advice, however, not punishment decision-making, so it does not support that part of the cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Optimal integration of opinions should consider judgments, confidence, and average objective accuracy of agents.

    “Optimal integration of opinions, whether from human or artificial agents, should consider the following factors: their judgments, their confidence in the correctness of their opinions, and the average objective accuracy of the agents in similar situations in the past.”

    From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) says optimal choices in its task combine the likely correct action with the probability that a human confederate’s advice is correct, learned from past outcomes. It does not address an agent’s expressed confidence in a particular opinion or establish the same rule for artificial agents. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A common neural structure observed in studies involving social and non-social reinforcers is the human striatum.

    “A common neural structure observed in studies involving social and non-social reinforcers is the human striatum”
  • Ventromedial prefrontal cortex appears to integrate information concerning advice from others, the validity of the advice, and the value of decision options.

    “Finally, ventromedial prefrontal cortex appears to integrate information concerning advice from others, the validity of the advice, and the value of decision options 3, 52.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Behrens, Timothy E. J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-11
Volume
456
Issue
7219
Pages
245-249
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2056448794
Cited by
925
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 56
FWCI
16.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social valuation, social learning, associative learning, reward learning, decision-making, advice taking, anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, social exchange, computational models of learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Reward, Social Behavior, Models, Statistical, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review