Cited by 37Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Using a symbolic process model as input for model-based fMRI analysis: Locating the neural correlates of problem state replacements

Borst, Jelmer P., Taatgen, Niels A., van Rijn, Hedderik·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

In this paper, a model-based analysis method for fMRI is used with a high-level symbolic process model. Participants performed a triple-task in which intermediate task information needs to be updated frequently. Previous work has shown that the associated resource - the problem state resource - acts as a bottleneck in multitasking. The model-based method was used to locate the neural correlates of 'problem state replacements'. To analyze the fMRI data, we fit the computational process model to the behavioral data and regressed the model's activity against the fMRI data. The brain region responsible for the temporary representation of problem states, the inferior parietal lobule, and the brain region responsible for long-term storage of problem states, the inferior frontal gyrus were thus identified. These results show that model-based fMRI analyses can be performed using high-level symbolic cognitive models, enabling fine-grained exploratory fMRI research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.084

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borst, J. P., Taatgen, N. A., & van Rijn, H.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Borst, Jelmer P.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
137-147
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016725357
Cited by
33
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
multitasking, cognitive bottleneck, inferior parietal lobule, inferior frontal gyrus, working memory, long-term storage, computational cognitive model, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Behavior, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Oxygen, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review