Cited by 45Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Why ultra high risk criteria for psychosis prediction do not work well outside clinical samples and what to do about it

Open access
Fusar‐Poli, Paolo·2017·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Why ultra high risk criteria for psychosis prediction do not work well outside clinical samples and what to do about it

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20405

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHR-P criteria are robustly associated with psychosis onset (OR=9.32) within high-risk clinical samples, but not in the general population.

    “The CHR-P criteria are robustly associated with psychosis onset (Odds Ratio, OR=9.32) 44 within high-risk clinical samples (but not in the general population 84 )”
  • Unstructured recruitment processes and risk enrichment procedures in samples undergoing clinical high-risk for psychosis assessment substantially determine the actual level of psychosis risk in these individuals, leading to underpowered and non-significant trials.

    “For example, it is apparent that unstructured recruitment processes and risk enrichment procedures in samples undergoing CHR-P assessment have a substantial role in determining the actual level of risk for psychosis in these individuals 107-109 , leading to underpowered and non-significant trials 95 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Valmaggia LR, Byrne M, Day F et al. Br J Psychiatry 2015;207:130-4.
  2. Fusar-Poli P, Diaz-Caneja CM, Patel R et al. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2016;133: 76-85.
  3. Schimmelmann BG, Michel C, Martz-Irngartinger A et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14:189-97.
  4. Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, Borgwardt S et al. JAMA Psychiatry 2016;73: 113-20.
  5. Fusar-Poli P, Rocchetti M, Sardella A et al. Br J Psychiatry 2015;207:198-206.
  6. Fusar-Poli P, Schultze-Lutter F. Evid Based Ment Health 2016;19:10-5.
  7. Fusar-Poli P, Schultze-Lutter F, Cappucciati M et al. Schizophr Bull 2016; 42:732-43.
  8. Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, Rutigliano G et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14: 322-32.
  9. Schneider M, Armando M, Pontillo M et al. World Psychiatry 2016;15: 259-65.
  10. Schmidt A, Cappucciati M, Radua J et al. Schizophr Bull (in press).
  11. Calkins ME, Moore TM, Satterthwaite TD et al. World Psychiatry 2017;16: 62-76.
  12. Fusar-Poli P, Rutigliano G, Stahl D et al. JAMA Psychiatry 2016;73:1260-7. DOI:10.1002/wps.20405 Drug use disorders: impact of a public health rather than a criminal justice approach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fusar‐Poli, P.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fusar‐Poli, Paolo
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-12
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
212-213
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2601758447
Cited by
45
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
clinical high risk for psychosis, psychosis prediction, clinical samples, generalizability, early intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review