The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of AUF1 in regulated mRNA decay
Abstract
Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) turnover is a major control point in gene expression. In mammals, many mRNAs encoding inflammatory cytokines, oncoproteins, and G‐protein‐coupled receptors are destabilized by the presence of AU‐rich elements (AREs) in their 3′‐untranslated regions. Association of ARE‐binding proteins (AUBPs) with these mRNAs promotes rapid mRNA degradation. ARE/poly(U)‐binding/degradation factor 1 (AUF1), one of the best‐characterized AUBPs, binds to many ARE‐mRNAs and assembles other factors necessary to recruit the mRNA degradation machinery. These factors include translation initiation factor eIF4G, chaperones hsp27 and hsp70, heat‐shock cognate protein hsc70, lactate dehydrogenase, poly(A)‐binding protein, and other unidentified proteins. Numerous signaling pathways alter the composition of this AUF1 complex of proteins to effect changes in ARE‐mRNA degradation rates. This review briefly describes the roles of mRNA decay in gene expression in general and ARE‐mediated decay (AMD) in particular, with a focus on AUF1 and the different modes of regulation that govern AUF1 involvement in AMD. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein–RNA Interactions: Functional Implications RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Regulation of RNA Stability
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HNRNPD protein has four isoforms, p37, p40, p42, and p45, generated by alternative precursor mRNA splicing.
“HNRNPD protein has four isoforms, p37, p40, p42, and p45, generated by alterative precursor mRNA splicing”
From A novel posttranscriptional mechanism for dietary cholesterol-mediated suppression of liver LDL receptor expression (2014) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AU-rich elements: characterization and importance in mRNA degradation
Chen, C.-Y. A., & Shyu, A.-B. (1995) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89102-1 · Cited by 1,948
Concurrent versus individual binding of HuR and AUF1 to common labile target mRNAs
Lal, A., Mazan‐Mamczarz, K., Kawai, T., Yang, X., Martindale, J. L., & Gorospe, M. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600305 · Cited by 461
Kiledjian, M., DeMaria, C. T., Brewer, G., & Novick, K. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.8.4870 · Cited by 145
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 101
- 10.1016/S0079-6603(08)60510-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03259-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.04.004 · DOI
- Nestler EJ, 2002, Neurophsycopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress, 217
- 10.1093/nar/gki1012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/mr.59.3.423-450.1995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35067025 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.17.12.6876 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00063-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00350-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1385/CBB:41:2:265 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.23.16174 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12179 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.15.4.2219 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.6.10.1927 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.13.3.1971 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/25.18.3564 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2130 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3605 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.501707 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/emboj.2009.67 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1201895 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.11.5.2460 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.2.2.215 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.13.12.7652 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27635 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33374 · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20060328 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.13.14.1884 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.21.20.6960-6971.2001 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M704745200 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh282 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M204002200 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.20.15.5425-5432.2000 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M411822200 · DOI
- 10.1042/0264-6021:3480151 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.14.2651 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.44.29224 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb1249 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00102-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/geno.1996.0269 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00020-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90168-6 · DOI
- 10.1006/geno.1997.5142 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.48.33973 · DOI
- Buzby JS, 1996, Increased granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor mRNA instability in cord versus adult mononuclear cells is translation‐dependent and associated with increased levels of A + U‐rich element binding factor, Blood, 88, 2889, 10.1182/blood.V88.8.2889.bloodjournal8882889 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpendo.2000.278.1.E50 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2616 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.38.22167 · DOI
- 10.1515/BC.2002.087 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.19.6.4056 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.00500-07 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.02251-05 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.1525507 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M301176200 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.112.10.1465 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.5269304 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04820.x · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601264 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M305772200 · DOI
- 10.1002/cm.10159 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.17.7.3898 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M305775200 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2006-04-014902 · DOI
- 10.1681/ASN.2006010083 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.284.5413.499 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M108521200 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkf444 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.00431-08 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00578-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1515/BC.2003.004 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.2308106 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/27.6.1464 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.1467606 · DOI
- 10.1038/jid.2008.298 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni1266 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.6999 · DOI
- Gouble A, 2002, A new player in oncogenesis: AUF1/hnRNPD overexpression leads to tumorigenesis in transgenic mice, Cancer Res, 62, 1489
- 10.1089/107999003322485053 · DOI
- 10.1089/jir.2008.0028 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01154-09 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8493 · DOI
- 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1862 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01236-06 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M501204200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M201377200 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.20.21.7903-7913.2000 · DOI
- 10.1128/JVI.74.17.8166-8175.2000 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7424 · DOI
- 10.1042/0264-6021:3380417 · DOI
- 10.1093/imammb/18.2.159 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M202272200 · DOI
- Hadcock JR, 1989, Agonist‐induced destabilization of beta‐adrenergic receptor mRNA. Attenuation of glucocorticoid‐induced up‐regulation of beta‐adrenergic receptors, J Biol Chem, 264, 19928, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)47200-1 · DOI
- Cleland JG, 1991, The renin‐angiotensin system in heart failure, Herz, 16, 68
- 10.1152/ajpheart.01162.2005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.029 · DOI
- 10.1038/5047 · DOI
- Palmisano WA, 2000, Predicting lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum, Cancer Res, 60, 5954
- 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.09.002 · DOI
- Wilson GM, RNA Binding Proteins: New Concepts in Gene Regulation, Endocrine Updates
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regulation of cytoplasmic mRNA decay
Schoenberg, D. R., & Maquat, L. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3160 · Cited by 656
The regulation of mRNA stability in mammalian cells: 2.0
Wu, X., & Brewer, G. (2012) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.021 · Cited by 239
Self-citationBronicki, L. M., & Jasmin, B. J. (2013) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.039164.113 · Cited by 126
Singh, A. B., Kan, C. F. K., Shende, V., Dong, B., & Liu, J. (2014) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m049429 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Gratacós, F. M., & Brewer, G.
- Venue
- WIREs RNA
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-14
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-473
- ISSN
- 1757-7004
- 1757-7012
- PMC
- PMC3608466
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review