Cited by 36Cholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 39 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

A novel posttranscriptional mechanism for dietary cholesterol-mediated suppression of liver LDL receptor expression

Open access

Abstract

It is well-established that over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver inhibits sterol-regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-mediated LDL receptor (LDLR) gene transcription leading to a reduced hepatic LDLR mRNA level in hypercholesterolemic animals. However, it is unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover to further repress LDLR expression in liver tissue. In the current study, we examined the effect of a high cholesterol diet on the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA binding proteins in three different animal models and in cultured hepatic cells. Our results demonstrate that high cholesterol feeding specifically elevates the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA decay promoting factor heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP)D without affecting expressions of other LDLR mRNA binding proteins in vivo and in vitro. Employing the approach of adenovirus-mediated gene knockdown, we further show that depletion of HNRNPD in the liver results in a marked reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol and a substantial increase in liver LDLR expression in hyperlipidemic mice. Additional studies of gene knockdown in albumin-luciferase-untranslated region (UTR) transgenic mice provide strong evidence supporting the essential role of 3'UTR in HNRNPD-mediated LDLR mRNA degradation in liver tissue. Altogether, this work identifies a novel posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism by which dietary cholesterol inhibits liver LDLR expression via inducing HNRNPD to accelerate LDLR mRNA degradation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

High-cholesterol feeding specifically induces the LDLR mRNA decay-promoting factor HNRNPD in liver tissue of mice and hamsters, identifying a posttranscriptional mechanism that complements SREBP-mediated transcriptional suppression of LDLR. Adenovirus-mediated hepatic knockdown of HNRNPD raised liver LDLR expression and lowered serum LDL-C, with larger effects in hypercholesterolemic than normolipidemic mice.

Key findings

  • A high-cholesterol diet (HCD) increased hepatic HNRNPD mRNA 1.9-fold (P < 0.001) in mice without affecting HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR; HNRNPD p45 and p37 protein rose 1.7- and 2.5-fold while LDLR protein fell to 50% of control. In hamsters, HCD raised HNRNPD mRNA ~2-fold and reduced LDLR mRNA 2.6-fold.
  • In HCD-fed C57BL/6J mice, Ad-shHNRNPD lowered serum total cholesterol by 18.2% (P < 0.001) and LDL-C by ~30% after 7 days versus control virus, with HDL-C unaffected; liver LDLR mRNA rose to 260% and LDLR protein to 163% of control (P < 0.01).
  • In normolipidemic mice the same knockdown produced smaller changes: TC −8% (P < 0.05), LDL-C −13% (P < 0.05), LDLR mRNA 173% and protein 130% of control.
  • In Alb-Luc-UTR transgenic mice, HNRNPD knockdown increased bioluminescence 4.2-fold (P < 0.001), liver Luc activity 3.2-fold, Luc-UTR mRNA 2.1-fold, and endogenous LDLR mRNA 1.8-fold, supporting a 3′UTR-dependent mechanism.
  • In HepG2 and AML12 cells, cholesterol raised HNRNPD mRNA modestly (131% and 133% of control, P < 0.001), while rosuvastatin and the LXR ligands 24-OHC and 24,25-EC did not substantially alter it.

Methods

  • Animal studies: 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice and 8–10-week-old male golden Syrian hamsters fed normal diet or HCD (1.25% cholesterol) for 2 weeks; Alb-Luc-UTR transgenic mice (2–3 months, male and female) fed ND or HCD for 4 weeks.
  • Adenovirus-mediated gene knockdown: Ad-shHNRNPD versus control (Ad-shGFP or Ad-shLacZ) injected retro-orbitally (6 × 10⁹ pfu/mouse in C57BL/6J; 4 × 10⁹ pfu/mouse in transgenic mice), with serum lipid measurement, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, in vivo bioluminescence imaging, tissue luciferase assay, and PCSK9 ELISA.
  • Cell culture: HepG2 and AML12 cells cultured in lipoprotein-depleted serum and treated with cholesterol, rosuvastatin, 24-OHC, or 24,25-EC for 24 h; statistics by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test or unpaired two-tailed t-test (P < 0.05 significant).

Limitations

  • The paper states that the molecular mechanism by which dietary cholesterol induces hepatic HNRNPD expression remains to be investigated, and that the in vitro HNRNPD induction by cholesterol was modest relative to the in vivo data.
  • The paper notes that most prior HNRNPD mechanistic work was done in cell culture or cell-free systems, and that the present study's mechanistic validation relied on the Alb-Luc-UTR reporter model.
  • Evident from the text: knockdown experiments used small groups (n = 5 per arm), and the diet studies used only male mice and hamsters, so sex- and dose-related generalization is untested.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1194/jlr.m049429

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

10 of 39 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    In liver cells, when intracellular cholesterol levels rise, LDLR mRNA levels fall substantially along with transcripts of other SREBP target genes.

    “In liver cells, when intracellular cholesterol levels rise, LDLR mRNA levels fall substantially along with transcripts of other SREBP target genes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Sheng, 1995, Independent regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding pro­teins 1 and 2 in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source

      The abstract (p. 935) links sterol depletion in hamster liver to increased transcription of the LDL receptor and HMG-CoA synthase genes. It also describes sterol overloading as blocking SREBP processing in cultured cells, but does not report that rising cholesterol substantially lowers LDLR mRNA and other SREBP-target transcripts in liver cells. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § RESULTS

    Ad-shHNRNPD expresses a shRNA that targets all isoforms of mouse and human HNRNPD.

    “In our previous in vitro studies, we had generated an adenovirus (Ad-shHNRNPD) to express a shRNA that targets all isoforms of mouse and human HNRNPD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Singh, 2014, The Critical role of mRNA destabilizing protein heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D in 3′ untranslated region-mediated decay of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in liver tissue, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    LDLR gene expression is subject to posttranscriptional regulation at the point of mRNA stability.

    “In addition to transcriptional regulation, LDLR gene expression is subject to posttranscriptional regulation at the point of mRNA stability”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [8] Wilson, 1998, Stabilization and cytoskeletal-association of LDL receptor mRNA are mediated by distinct domains in its 3′ untranslated region, J. Lipid Res. source
    • cites [9] Wilson, 1997, Modulation of LDL receptor mRNA stability by phorbol esters in human liver cell culture models, J. Lipid Res. source
    • cites [10] Goto, 1997, Upregulation of low density lipoproteinreceptor by gemfibrozil, a hypolipidemic agent, in human hepatoma cells through stabilization of mRNA transcripts, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
    • cites [11] Kong, 2004, Berberine is a promising novel cholesterol-lowering drug working through a unique mechanism distinct from statins, Nat. Med. source
  • Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    HNRNPD depletion does not affect hepatic mRNA levels of other SREBP2 target genes measured in hypercholesterolemic mice.

    “In contrast to LDLR, HRNPD depletion did not affect mRNA levels of other SREBP2 target genes that were measured.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    A high cholesterol diet increases serum total cholesterol 4-fold in hamsters.

    “The serum TC was increased 4-fold in hamsters fed a HCD as compared with hamsters fed a ND (supplementary Fig. IB).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Some ARE-binding proteins are mRNA destabilizing inducers, while others can protect the mRNA from endonuclease cleavage.

    “Some ARE-BPs are mRNA destabilizing inducers, while others can protect the mRNA from endonuclease cleavage”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Barreau, 2005, Survey and summary AU-rich elements and associated factors: are there unifying principles?, Nucleic Acids Res. source

      The paper’s ‘Functional Relationships Between ARE-BPs’ section says that most identified ARE-binding proteins have been implicated in mRNA degradation, while its ‘Hu family’ section reports that HuR binding increases mRNA stability. It does not say that stabilizing proteins protect mRNA specifically from endonuclease cleavage; the degradation mechanisms it discusses include deadenylation and exonuclease activity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Zhang, 2002, AU-rich element-mediated translational control: complexity and multiple activity of trans-activating factors, Biochem. Soc. Trans. source
    • cites [20] Meyer, 2004, Messenger RNA turnover in eukaryotes: pathways and enzymes, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Increased hepatic LDLR expression results in improved clearance of plasma LDL-C through receptor-mediated endocytosis.

    “Increased hepatic LDLR expression results in improved clearance of plasma LDL-C through receptor-mediated endocytosis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Marcoux, 1998, Plasma remnant-like particle lipid and apolipoprotein levels in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic subjects, Atherosclerosis. source
    • cites [5] Homma, 2004, Predictors of atherosclerosis, J. Atheroscler. Thromb. source

      The Plasma Lipoproteins section discusses LDL-C as a clinical measure and LDL levels as a coronary risk factor, but does not address hepatic LDLR expression or LDL clearance. Searches for LDL receptor, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and clearance found no passage establishing the claimed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Increased hepatic LDLR expression is strongly associated with a decreased risk of developing cardiovascular disease in humans.

    “which is strongly associated with a decreased risk of developing cardiovascular disease in humans”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Marcoux, 1998, Plasma remnant-like particle lipid and apolipoprotein levels in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic subjects, Atherosclerosis. source
    • cites [5] Homma, 2004, Predictors of atherosclerosis, J. Atheroscler. Thromb. source

      The Plasma Lipoproteins section says that elevated plasma LDL is a risk factor for coronary artery disease and recommends reducing LDL cholesterol in certain high-risk subjects. It does not address hepatic LDL receptor (LDLR) expression or an association between increased expression and reduced cardiovascular disease risk in humans (searched: hepatic LDL receptor expression; LDL receptor liver expression). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver prevents proteolytic activation of SREBPs and leads to a decline in expression of SREBP target genes, including LDLR and SREBP2 itself.

    “Over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver prevents the proteolytic activation of SREBPs and leads to a decline in the expression of SREBP target genes, including LDLR and SREBP2 itself.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] Korn, 1998, Blunted feedback suppression of SREBP processing by dietary cholesterol in transgenic mice expressing sterol-resistant SCAP(D443N), J. Clin. Invest. source

      The Results (page not specified) show that a cholesterol/cholic acid diet sharply reduced nuclear SREBP-2 in wild-type mouse liver and reduced LDL receptor mRNA by 20%. The paper does not report that dietary cholesterol reduced SREBP-2 gene expression itself; the Discussion describes SREBP-2 self-regulation as a possibility. Suppression was also blunted, rather than complete, in the SCAP(D443N) transgenic mice. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] Sheng, 1995, Independent regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding pro­teins 1 and 2 in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source

      The Abstract (p. 935) says sterol overloading blocks proteolytic processing of both SREBPs in cultured cells and identifies LDLR as a gene whose transcription SREBPs activate. It contrasts those findings with non-coordinated regulation in hamster liver; it does not show that dietary cholesterol accumulation in liver blocks both SREBPs or lowers expression of LDLR and SREBP2 itself. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Shimomura, 1997, Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Knocking down HNRNPD, HNRNPI, or KSRP in HepG2 cells resulted in elevations of LDLR mRNA.

    “Knocking down each of these proteins in HepG2 cells resulted in elevations of LDLR mRNA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Li, 2009, Identification of mRNA-binding proteins that regulate the stability of LDL receptor mRNA through AU-rich elements, J. Lipid Res. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    Ad-shHNRNPD injection does not significantly change body weight or food intake in hypercholesterolemic mice.

    “Measurements of body weight and food intake throughout the treatments did not detect significant changes associated with Ad-shHNRNPD injection (supplementary Fig. IIIA, B), thereby ruling out the influence of food intake as a causing factor for reduced serum cholesterol levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    HNRNPD depletion increased liver LDLR protein by 136% in ND-fed livers and by 119% in HCD-fed livers compared with control mice fed ND.

    “Depletion of HNRNPD resulted in a 136% (P < 0.001) increase in ND-fed livers and a 119% (P < 0.01) increase in HCD-fed livers as compared with LDLR protein levels in control mice fed a ND (supplementary Fig. V).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    In Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic LDLR mRNA level increases to 260% of control.

    “Figure 2D shows that in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice, mRNA levels of p37 and p45 isoforms were both significantly reduced to approximately 40% of that in control mice (P < 0.001), which was associated with a marked increase in the LDLR mRNA level to 260% of control (P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    In Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic mRNA levels of p37 and p45 HNRNPD isoforms are reduced to approximately 40% of control.

    “Figure 2D shows that in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice, mRNA levels of p37 and p45 isoforms were both significantly reduced to approximately 40% of that in control mice (P < 0.001), which was associated with a marked increase in the LDLR mRNA level to 260% of control (P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Oxysterols (LXR activators) and RSV (SREBP2 activator) did not alter HNRNPD mRNA expression in cultured hepatic cells.

    “None of these treatments altered HNRNPD mRNA expression in cultured hepatic cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    In Alb-Luc-UTR mice, HNRNPD shRNA reduced p45 and p37 mRNA levels and increased Luc-UTR mRNA (2.1-fold) and endogenous LDLR mRNA (1.8-fold).

    “Similar to C57BL/6J mice, expression of HNRNPD shRNA in the liver of Alb-Luc-UTR mice resulted in marked reductions of p45 and p37 mRNA levels with corresponding increases of Luc-UTR mRNA level (2.1-fold of control) and mouse endogenous LDLR mRNA level (1.8-fold of control).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    Cholesterol supplementation increased HNRNPD mRNA levels to 131% of control in HepG2 cells and to 133% in AML12 cells.

    “Gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR shows that cholesterol supplementation increased HNRNPD mRNA levels to 131% (P < 0.001) of control in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5A) and elevated HNRNPD mRNA levels to 133% (P < 0.001) of control in AML12 cells (Fig. 5B) while RSV had no effect on HNRNPD expression in both cell lines.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    In HepG2 cells, HNRNPD mRNA levels were unchanged by 24,25-EC at 10 and 20 μM and only elevated approximately 10% by 24-OHC.

    “Surprisingly, HNRNPD mRNA levels were unchanged by 24,25-EC at both 10 and 20 μM concentrations and were only elevated approximately 10% over control by 24-OHC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    HNRNPD mRNA levels were consistently elevated in hepatic cell lines by cholesterol, but increases were relatively modest compared with in vivo data.

    “We consistently detected elevations of HNRNPD mRNA levels in these hepatic cell lines, but the increases were relatively modest as compared with in vivo data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    In HepG2 and AML12 cells, LDLR mRNA levels were suppressed by cholesterol treatment and strongly elevated by RSV.

    “In contrast to HNRNPD, LDLR mRNA levels were suppressed by cholesterol treatment and were strongly elevated by RSV.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Intracellular cholesterol levels play a primary role in determining hepatic LDLR expression levels through a negative feedback mechanism controlling gene transcription mediated by SRE in the LDLR promoter and SREBPs.

    “many studies have demonstrated that intracellular cholesterol levels play a primary role in determination of hepatic LDLR expression levels through a negative feedback mechanism that controls gene transcription mediated by the sterol-regulatory element (SRE) located in LDLR promoter and SRE binding proteins (SREBPs)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] Brown, 1997, The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of the membrane bound transcription factor, Cell. source
    • cites [7] Brown, 1999, A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    HuR is a stabilizing factor for LDLR mRNA.

    “A recent new study identified human antigen R (HuR) as a stabilizing factor for LDLR mRNA”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Yashiro, 2013, 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside stabilizes low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in hepatocytes via ERK-dependent HuR binding to an AU-rich element, Atherosclerosis. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § RESULTS

    HNRNPD protein has four isoforms, p37, p40, p42, and p45, generated by alternative precursor mRNA splicing.

    “HNRNPD protein has four isoforms, p37, p40, p42, and p45, generated by alterative precursor mRNA splicing”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [30] Gratacós, 2010, The role of AUF1 in regulated mRNA decay, RNA. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [31] Loflin, 1999, Unraveling a cytoplasmic role for hnRNP D in the in vivo mRNA destabilization directed by the AU-rich element, Genes Dev. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [32] Barker, 2012, Sequence requirements for RNA binding by HuR and AUF1, J. Biochem. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    mRNA stability plays a key role in the control of gene expression both by setting the basal level of gene expression and as a site of regulatory responses.

    “It is well-known that mRNA stability plays a key role in the control of gene expression both by setting the basal level of gene expression and as a site of regulatory responses”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Parker, 2004, The enzyme and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The expression of liver LDLR regulates human plasma LDL-cholesterol homeostasis.

    “The expression of liver LDL receptor (LDLR) regulates human plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) homeostasis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Spady, 1992, Hepatic clearance of plasma low density lipoproteins, Semin. Liver Dis. source
    • cites [2] Brown, 1986, A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis, Science. source
    • cites [3] Goldstein, 1990, Regulation of the mevalonate pathway, Nature. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver inhibits SREBP-mediated LDLR gene transcription, leading to reduced hepatic LDLR mRNA levels in hypercholesterolemic animals.

    “It is well-established that over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver inhibits sterol-regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-mediated LDL receptor (LDLR) gene transcription leading to a reduced hepatic LDLR mRNA level in hypercholesterolemic animals.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
      “While this decrease in LDLR mRNA abundance has been attributed to the transcriptional suppression due to the inhibition of proteolytic processing of SREBP”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] Shimomura, 1997, Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
    • cites [15] Korn, 1998, Blunted feedback suppression of SREBP processing by dietary cholesterol in transgenic mice expressing sterol-resistant SCAP(D443N), J. Clin. Invest. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § RESULTS

    In mouse liver tissue and mouse primary hepatocytes, only the p37 and p45 HNRNPD isoforms could be detected.

    “In mouse liver tissue and mouse primary hepatocytes, only the p37 and p45 isoforms could be detected”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Singh, 2014, The Critical role of mRNA destabilizing protein heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D in 3′ untranslated region-mediated decay of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in liver tissue, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § RESULTS

    Eliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.

    “Collectively, the results of protein and mRNA analyses from ND and HCD mice clearly demonstrate that cholesterol feeding elevates the LDLR mRNA degrading protein HNRNPD, and that eliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into a substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    In HepG2 cells, HuR bound to the proximal ARE site of LDLR 3′UTR and led to an increase in LDLR mRNA half-life.

    “It was shown in HepG2 cells that HuR bound to the proximal ARE site of LDLR 3′UTR and led to an increase in LDLR mRNA half-life.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Yashiro, 2013, 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside stabilizes low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in hepatocytes via ERK-dependent HuR binding to an AU-rich element, Atherosclerosis. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § RESULTS

    Hepatic depletion of HNRNPD produced a modest yet significant impact on LDLR expression and on LDLR-mediated removal of serum cholesterol under normolipidemic conditions.

    “Collectively, these data demonstrated that hepatic depletion of HNRNPD produced a modest yet significant impact on LDLR expression and on LDLR-mediated removal of serum cholesterol under normolipidemic conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    HNRNPD, HNRNPI, and KSRP are decay-promoting factors that bind to ARE sequences of LDLR 3′UTR and accelerate LDLR mRNA decay in HepG2 cells.

    “Our previous studies have identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP)D, HNRNPI, and KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP) as decay-promoting factors that bind to ARE sequences of LDLR 3′UTR and accelerate the mRNA decay in HepG2 cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Li, 2009, Identification of mRNA-binding proteins that regulate the stability of LDL receptor mRNA through AU-rich elements, J. Lipid Res. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The LDLR mRNA 3′ UTR harbors four AU-rich elements (AREs) that are docking sites for cytoplasmic ARE-binding proteins.

    “This region harbors four adenylate-uridylate (AU)-rich elements (AREs)”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “that are docking sites for cytoplasmic ARE-binding proteins (ARE-BPs).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] Wilson, 1998, Stabilization and cytoskeletal-association of LDL receptor mRNA are mediated by distinct domains in its 3′ untranslated region, J. Lipid Res. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [9] Wilson, 1997, Modulation of LDL receptor mRNA stability by phorbol esters in human liver cell culture models, J. Lipid Res. source
    • cites [17] Yashiro, 2011, Chenodeoxycholic acid stabilization of LDL receptor mRNA depends on 3′-untranslated region and AU-rich element-binding protein, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The results demonstrate the key role of HNRNPD in regulation of lipid metabolism by targeting LDLR and unravel its regulation by dietary cholesterol in liver tissue.

    “The results of our current studies not only demonstrate the key role of HNRNPD in regulation of lipid metabolism by targeting LDLR, but also unravel its regulation by dietary cholesterol in liver tissue.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § RESULTS

    In cultured hepatic cells, HNRNPD mRNA expression was modestly and consistently elevated by cholesterol, but did not respond to activators of LXR or SREBP.

    “Altogether, these results show that in cultured hepatic cells, HNRNPD mRNA expression was modestly and consistently elevated by cholesterol, but it did not respond to activators of LXR or SREBP.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The significant induction of HNRNPD mRNA and protein by HCD in both mice and hamsters suggests that HNRNPD might contribute to downregulation of LDLR mRNA levels in cholesterol-loaded livers.

    “The significant induction of HNRNPD mRNA and protein by a HCD in both mice and hamsters suggested that this mRNA decay-promoting protein might contribute to the downregulation of LDLR mRNA levels in cholesterol-loaded livers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § RESULTS

    Activation of LXR by oxysterols positively regulates LXR target genes and inhibits SREBP processing.

    “Activation of LXR by oxysterols positively regulates LXR target genes and inhibits SREBP processing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Jakobsson, 2012, Liver X receptor biology and pharmacology: new pathways, challenges and opportunities, Trends Pharmacol. Sci. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Dietary cholesterol reduces liver LDLR mRNA through dual action mechanisms of transcriptional suppression and acceleration of mRNA decay mediated by HNRNPD.

    “The results from this current study demonstrate, for the first time, that dietary cholesterol reduces liver LDLR mRNA through dual action mechanisms of transcriptional suppression and acceleration of mRNA decay mediated by HNRNPD, the LDLR mRNA decay promoting ARE binding protein.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
32 of 32
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    It is unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover to further repress LDLR expression in liver tissue.

    “However, it is unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover to further repress LDLR expression in liver tissue.”
    “it is currently unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can also elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover rate as a rapid means to lower LDLR expression and to further reduce cholesterol uptake from outside of cells.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is no literature report describing the effect of sterols on the expression or activity of these LDLR mRNA binding proteins.

    “To date, there is no literature report describing the effect of sterols on the expression or activity of these LDLR mRNA binding proteins.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.

    “Collectively, the results of protein and mRNA analyses from ND and HCD mice clearly demonstrate that cholesterol feeding elevates the LDLR mRNA degrading protein HNRNPD, and that eliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into a substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high cholesterol diet increases hepatic expression of hnRNP D in murine models, which leads to degradation of LDLR mRNA, whereas adenovirus-mediated depletion of hnRNP D decreased circulating LDL levels.

    “More recently, it has been shown that high cholesterol diet increases hepatic expression of hnRNP D in murine models which in turn leads to degradation of LDLR mRNA, whereas adenovirus mediated depletion of hnRNP D decreased circulating LDL levels63.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • LDLR percentage increases use incompatible baselines

    Minor

    The stated 25% decrease puts the HCD control at 75% of the ND control. A 119% increase over the ND control would put the treated HCD group at 219% of the ND control-not 159% of the HCD control or a 159% increase over it. The 159% figure fits only if 119% denotes the final level rather than an increase.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Singh, A. B., Kan, C. F. K., Shende, V., Dong, B., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Jingwen
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
1397-1407
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106287709
Cited by
35
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Lipid Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT006336, R01AT002543)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
LDL receptor, dietary cholesterol, HNRNPD, post-transcriptional regulation, mRNA degradation, 3' untranslated region, hepatic gene expression, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol, SREBP
MeSH terms
Animals, Cholesterol, Dietary, Gene Expression Regulation, Liver, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Receptors, LDL, 3' Untranslated Regions, RNA Stability, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review