The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 39 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
A novel posttranscriptional mechanism for dietary cholesterol-mediated suppression of liver LDL receptor expression
Open accessAbstract
It is well-established that over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver inhibits sterol-regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-mediated LDL receptor (LDLR) gene transcription leading to a reduced hepatic LDLR mRNA level in hypercholesterolemic animals. However, it is unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover to further repress LDLR expression in liver tissue. In the current study, we examined the effect of a high cholesterol diet on the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA binding proteins in three different animal models and in cultured hepatic cells. Our results demonstrate that high cholesterol feeding specifically elevates the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA decay promoting factor heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP)D without affecting expressions of other LDLR mRNA binding proteins in vivo and in vitro. Employing the approach of adenovirus-mediated gene knockdown, we further show that depletion of HNRNPD in the liver results in a marked reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol and a substantial increase in liver LDLR expression in hyperlipidemic mice. Additional studies of gene knockdown in albumin-luciferase-untranslated region (UTR) transgenic mice provide strong evidence supporting the essential role of 3'UTR in HNRNPD-mediated LDLR mRNA degradation in liver tissue. Altogether, this work identifies a novel posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism by which dietary cholesterol inhibits liver LDLR expression via inducing HNRNPD to accelerate LDLR mRNA degradation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
High-cholesterol feeding specifically induces the LDLR mRNA decay-promoting factor HNRNPD in liver tissue of mice and hamsters, identifying a posttranscriptional mechanism that complements SREBP-mediated transcriptional suppression of LDLR. Adenovirus-mediated hepatic knockdown of HNRNPD raised liver LDLR expression and lowered serum LDL-C, with larger effects in hypercholesterolemic than normolipidemic mice.
Key findings
- A high-cholesterol diet (HCD) increased hepatic HNRNPD mRNA 1.9-fold (P < 0.001) in mice without affecting HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR; HNRNPD p45 and p37 protein rose 1.7- and 2.5-fold while LDLR protein fell to 50% of control. In hamsters, HCD raised HNRNPD mRNA ~2-fold and reduced LDLR mRNA 2.6-fold.
- In HCD-fed C57BL/6J mice, Ad-shHNRNPD lowered serum total cholesterol by 18.2% (P < 0.001) and LDL-C by ~30% after 7 days versus control virus, with HDL-C unaffected; liver LDLR mRNA rose to 260% and LDLR protein to 163% of control (P < 0.01).
- In normolipidemic mice the same knockdown produced smaller changes: TC −8% (P < 0.05), LDL-C −13% (P < 0.05), LDLR mRNA 173% and protein 130% of control.
- In Alb-Luc-UTR transgenic mice, HNRNPD knockdown increased bioluminescence 4.2-fold (P < 0.001), liver Luc activity 3.2-fold, Luc-UTR mRNA 2.1-fold, and endogenous LDLR mRNA 1.8-fold, supporting a 3′UTR-dependent mechanism.
- In HepG2 and AML12 cells, cholesterol raised HNRNPD mRNA modestly (131% and 133% of control, P < 0.001), while rosuvastatin and the LXR ligands 24-OHC and 24,25-EC did not substantially alter it.
Methods
- Animal studies: 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice and 8–10-week-old male golden Syrian hamsters fed normal diet or HCD (1.25% cholesterol) for 2 weeks; Alb-Luc-UTR transgenic mice (2–3 months, male and female) fed ND or HCD for 4 weeks.
- Adenovirus-mediated gene knockdown: Ad-shHNRNPD versus control (Ad-shGFP or Ad-shLacZ) injected retro-orbitally (6 × 10⁹ pfu/mouse in C57BL/6J; 4 × 10⁹ pfu/mouse in transgenic mice), with serum lipid measurement, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, in vivo bioluminescence imaging, tissue luciferase assay, and PCSK9 ELISA.
- Cell culture: HepG2 and AML12 cells cultured in lipoprotein-depleted serum and treated with cholesterol, rosuvastatin, 24-OHC, or 24,25-EC for 24 h; statistics by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test or unpaired two-tailed t-test (P < 0.05 significant).
Limitations
- The paper states that the molecular mechanism by which dietary cholesterol induces hepatic HNRNPD expression remains to be investigated, and that the in vitro HNRNPD induction by cholesterol was modest relative to the in vivo data.
- The paper notes that most prior HNRNPD mechanistic work was done in cell culture or cell-free systems, and that the present study's mechanistic validation relied on the Alb-Luc-UTR reporter model.
- Evident from the text: knockdown experiments used small groups (n = 5 per arm), and the diet studies used only male mice and hamsters, so sex- and dose-related generalization is untested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
10 of 39 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
In liver cells, when intracellular cholesterol levels rise, LDLR mRNA levels fall substantially along with transcripts of other SREBP target genes.
“In liver cells, when intracellular cholesterol levels rise, LDLR mRNA levels fall substantially along with transcripts of other SREBP target genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Sheng, 1995, Independent regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins 1 and 2 in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
The abstract (p. 935) links sterol depletion in hamster liver to increased transcription of the LDL receptor and HMG-CoA synthase genes. It also describes sterol overloading as blocking SREBP processing in cultured cells, but does not report that rising cholesterol substantially lowers LDLR mRNA and other SREBP-target transcripts in liver cells. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ RESULTS
Ad-shHNRNPD expresses a shRNA that targets all isoforms of mouse and human HNRNPD.
“In our previous in vitro studies, we had generated an adenovirus (Ad-shHNRNPD) to express a shRNA that targets all isoforms of mouse and human HNRNPD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Singh, 2014, The Critical role of mRNA destabilizing protein heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D in 3′ untranslated region-mediated decay of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in liver tissue, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
LDLR gene expression is subject to posttranscriptional regulation at the point of mRNA stability.
“In addition to transcriptional regulation, LDLR gene expression is subject to posttranscriptional regulation at the point of mRNA stability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [8] Wilson, 1998, Stabilization and cytoskeletal-association of LDL receptor mRNA are mediated by distinct domains in its 3′ untranslated region, J. Lipid Res. source
- cites [9] Wilson, 1997, Modulation of LDL receptor mRNA stability by phorbol esters in human liver cell culture models, J. Lipid Res. source
- cites [10] Goto, 1997, Upregulation of low density lipoproteinreceptor by gemfibrozil, a hypolipidemic agent, in human hepatoma cells through stabilization of mRNA transcripts, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
- cites [11] Kong, 2004, Berberine is a promising novel cholesterol-lowering drug working through a unique mechanism distinct from statins, Nat. Med. source
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
HNRNPD depletion does not affect hepatic mRNA levels of other SREBP2 target genes measured in hypercholesterolemic mice.
“In contrast to LDLR, HRNPD depletion did not affect mRNA levels of other SREBP2 target genes that were measured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases serum total cholesterol 4-fold in hamsters.
“The serum TC was increased 4-fold in hamsters fed a HCD as compared with hamsters fed a ND (supplementary Fig. IB).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases hepatic HNRNPD p37 protein to 2.5-fold of control in mice.
“The results demonstrated that HCD feeding increased both HNRNPD p45 and p37 isoforms to 1.7- and 2.5-fold, respectively, of control and reduced LDLR protein abundance to 50% of control (Fig. 1C, D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Ad-shHNRNPD-infected livers had 3.2-fold higher Luc activity compared with control.
“We further measured ex vivo Luc activity of individual liver samples and observed a 3.2-fold higher Luc activity in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected livers as compared with control (Fig. 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases hepatic HNRNPD p45 protein to 1.7-fold of control in mice.
“The results demonstrated that HCD feeding increased both HNRNPD p45 and p37 isoforms to 1.7- and 2.5-fold, respectively, of control and reduced LDLR protein abundance to 50% of control (Fig. 1C, D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
HCD-fed C57BL/6J mice had significant increases in HNRNPD mRNA and protein levels compared with ND-fed mice.
“Again, we detected significant increases in HNRNPD mRNA and protein levels in HCD-fed C57BL/6J mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases hepatic HNRNPD mRNA levels by 1.9-fold in mice.
“Figure 1A shows that a HCD increased HNRNPD mRNA levels by 1.9-fold (P < 0.001) without affecting HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR mRNA expressions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet reduces hepatic LDLR protein abundance to 50% of control in mice.
“The results demonstrated that HCD feeding increased both HNRNPD p45 and p37 isoforms to 1.7- and 2.5-fold, respectively, of control and reduced LDLR protein abundance to 50% of control (Fig. 1C, D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Hepatic HuR protein levels do not differ between high cholesterol diet and normal diet groups in mice.
“Consistent with the gene expression analysis, protein levels of HuR did not differ between diet groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases hepatic HNRNPD mRNA level approximately 2-fold in hamsters.
“A HCD increased the HNRNPD mRNA level approximately 2-fold and reduced the LDLR mRNA level by 2.6-fold as compared with a ND (Fig. 1E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Gene knockdown in albumin-luciferase-UTR transgenic mice provides strong evidence supporting the essential role of 3′UTR in HNRNPD-mediated LDLR mRNA degradation in liver tissue.
“Additional studies of gene knockdown in albumin-luciferase-untranslated region (UTR) transgenic mice provide strong evidence supporting the essential role of 3′UTR in HNRNPD-mediated LDLR mRNA degradation in liver tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet does not affect hepatic mRNA expressions of HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR in mice.
“Figure 1A shows that a HCD increased HNRNPD mRNA levels by 1.9-fold (P < 0.001) without affecting HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR mRNA expressions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In hypercholesterolemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection reduces serum total cholesterol by 13.9% after 4 days compared with control.
“While on a HCD, serum cholesterol levels continued rising during the treatment in control mice (Ad-shGFP), a significant drop in serum TC level was observed after 4 days of injection in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice (−13.9%, P < 0.05 compared with control mice), and serum TC further declined to a level which was 18.2% (P < 0.001) lower than control mice after 7 days of injection (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In hypercholesterolemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection reduces serum LDL-C by approximately 22% after 4 days compared with control.
“The time-dependent reduction in serum LDL-C levels by Ad-shHNRNPD infection in HCD mice was even more pronounced, with ∼22% lowering after 4 days and 30% lowering after 7 days, as compared with control mice (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Depletion of HNRNPD in the liver results in a substantial increase in liver LDLR expression in hyperlipidemic mice.
“Employing the approach of adenovirus-mediated gene knockdown, we further show that depletion of HNRNPD in the liver results in a marked reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol and a substantial increase in liver LDLR expression in hyperlipidemic mice.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Figure 2D shows that in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice, mRNA levels of p37 and p45 isoforms were both significantly reduced to approximately 40% of that in control mice (P < 0.001), which was associated with a marked increase in the LDLR mRNA level to 260% of control (P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data§ Abstract
High cholesterol feeding does not affect expressions of other LDLR mRNA binding proteins (HNRNPI, KSRP, HuR) in vivo and in vitro.
“Our results demonstrate that high cholesterol feeding specifically elevates the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA decay promoting factor heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP)D without affecting expressions of other LDLR mRNA binding proteins in vivo and in vitro.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Figure 1A shows that a HCD increased HNRNPD mRNA levels by 1.9-fold (P < 0.001) without affecting HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR mRNA expressions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
The increase in LDLR abundance by HNRNPD depletion was 159% compared with HCD control groups.
“Again, the increase in LDLR abundance by HNRNPD depletion was higher when compared with HCD control groups (159%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In normolipidemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection increased LDLR protein levels to 130% of control.
“Western blot analysis further demonstrated that LDLR protein levels were increased to 130% of control by Ad-shHNRNPD injection while HNRNPD p45 and p37 isoforms were reduced to 50 and 69% of control in normolipidemic mice, respectively (Fig. 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In normolipidemic (ND) mice, hepatic depletion of HNRNPD increased LDLR mRNA levels to 173% of control.
“Analysis of hepatic gene expression by real-time qRT-PCR showed that the substantial reductions of HNRNPD isoforms in ND mice increased LDLR mRNA levels to 173% of control (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic LDLR protein level increases to 163% of control.
“This reduction of HNRNPD protein abundance was associated with an increase of 163% of control in the hepatic LDLR protein level (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Depletion of HNRNPD in the liver results in a marked reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol in hyperlipidemic mice.
“Employing the approach of adenovirus-mediated gene knockdown, we further show that depletion of HNRNPD in the liver results in a marked reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol and a substantial increase in liver LDLR expression in hyperlipidemic mice.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“The time-dependent reduction in serum LDL-C levels by Ad-shHNRNPD infection in HCD mice was even more pronounced, with ∼22% lowering after 4 days and 30% lowering after 7 days, as compared with control mice (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
Ad-shHNRNPD infection did not alter mRNA levels of HNRNPI, KSRP, HuR, PCSK9, HMG-CoA reductase, or SREBP2 in liver samples.
“The results showed that none of these mRNA levels were altered by Ad-shHNRNPD infection (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Serum HDL-C levels are not affected by HNRNPD depletion in hypercholesterolemic mice throughout the treatment duration.
“Serum HDL-C levels were not affected by HNRNPD depletion throughout the treatment duration (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet markedly decreases hepatic mRNA levels of LDLR and other SREBP2 target genes, including PCSK9 and SREBP2, in mice.
“In contrast and as expected, mRNA levels of LDLR and other SREBP2 target genes, including PCSK9 and SREBP2, were markedly decreased by HCD feeding (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Knockdown of HNRNPD expression in liver has no impact on serum PCSK9 concentration in hypercholesterolemic mice.
“As we expected, knockdown of HNRNPD expression in liver had no impact on serum PCSK9 concentration (supplementary Fig. IIIC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In HCD mice, mRNA levels of four out of five HNRNPD target transcripts (cyclin B2, cyclin D1, IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα) were significantly reduced compared with ND-fed mice.
“Consistent with an increased HNRNPD expression by HCD, mRNA levels of four out of five HNRNPD targeted transcripts were significantly reduced in liver samples of HCD mice compared with ND-fed mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet reduces hepatic LDLR mRNA level by 2.6-fold in hamsters.
“A HCD increased the HNRNPD mRNA level approximately 2-fold and reduced the LDLR mRNA level by 2.6-fold as compared with a ND (Fig. 1E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In hypercholesterolemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection reduces serum total cholesterol by 18.2% after 7 days compared with control.
“While on a HCD, serum cholesterol levels continued rising during the treatment in control mice (Ad-shGFP), a significant drop in serum TC level was observed after 4 days of injection in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice (−13.9%, P < 0.05 compared with control mice), and serum TC further declined to a level which was 18.2% (P < 0.001) lower than control mice after 7 days of injection (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In normolipidemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection decreases serum total cholesterol by 8% compared with control.
“Ad-shHNRNPD injection at the same dose into mice fed a ND resulted in a relatively modest decrease in TC (−8%, P < 0.05; Fig. 3A) and LDL-C (−13%, P < 0.05; Fig. 3B) compared with the control mice infected with Ad-shGFP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet induces hepatic HNRNPD p37 protein expression in hamsters.
“Western blot analysis further corroborated the induction of HNRNPD p37 protein expression in hamster liver by HCD feeding (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
High cholesterol feeding specifically elevates hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA decay promoting factor HNRNPD in vivo and in vitro.
“Our results demonstrate that high cholesterol feeding specifically elevates the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA decay promoting factor heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP)D without affecting expressions of other LDLR mRNA binding proteins in vivo and in vitro.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“We observed that the hepatic expression of LDLR mRNA decay promoting factor HNRNPD was specifically induced by HCD in mice as well as in hamsters, while expressions of HNRNPI, KSRP, and HuR were unaffected by high cholesterol feeding.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Figure 1A shows that a HCD increased HNRNPD mRNA levels by 1.9-fold (P < 0.001) without affecting HNRNPI, KSRP, or HuR mRNA expressions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
In hypercholesterolemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection reduces serum LDL-C by 30% after 7 days compared with control.
“The time-dependent reduction in serum LDL-C levels by Ad-shHNRNPD infection in HCD mice was even more pronounced, with ∼22% lowering after 4 days and 30% lowering after 7 days, as compared with control mice (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Cholesterol feeding elevates the LDLR mRNA degrading protein HNRNPD in mice.
“Collectively, the results of protein and mRNA analyses from ND and HCD mice clearly demonstrate that cholesterol feeding elevates the LDLR mRNA degrading protein HNRNPD, and that eliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into a substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
In normolipidemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection decreases serum LDL-C by 13% compared with control.
“Ad-shHNRNPD injection at the same dose into mice fed a ND resulted in a relatively modest decrease in TC (−8%, P < 0.05; Fig. 3A) and LDL-C (−13%, P < 0.05; Fig. 3B) compared with the control mice infected with Ad-shGFP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The HNRNPD p45 isoform could not be detected in hamster liver.
“The p45 isoform could not be detected in hamster liver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic HNRNPD p37 protein level is reduced to 71% of control.
“Western blot analysis of individual liver homogenates further demonstrated that the p45 protein level in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice was reduced to 36% of control and p37 protein was lowered to 71% of control by the expression of HNRNPD shRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A cholesterol diet lowered liver LDLR protein by 25% compared with ND in Ad-shGFP-infected mice.
“Results showed that a cholesterol diet lowered LDLR by 25% (P < 0.001) as compared with the ND group in Ad-shGFP-infected mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In normolipidemic mice, HDL-C levels are not affected by Ad-shHNRNPD injection.
“Again, HDL-C levels were not affected by Ad-shHNRNPD injection (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic HNRNPD p45 protein level is reduced to 36% of control.
“Western blot analysis of individual liver homogenates further demonstrated that the p45 protein level in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice was reduced to 36% of control and p37 protein was lowered to 71% of control by the expression of HNRNPD shRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In normolipidemic mice, Ad-shHNRNPD injection reduced HNRNPD p45 and p37 isoforms to 50% and 69% of control, respectively.
“Western blot analysis further demonstrated that LDLR protein levels were increased to 130% of control by Ad-shHNRNPD injection while HNRNPD p45 and p37 isoforms were reduced to 50 and 69% of control in normolipidemic mice, respectively (Fig. 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases serum cholesterol levels in mice.
“Feeding mice a HCD for 4 weeks increased serum cholesterol levels by ∼2-fold from 122 to 240 mg/dl and serum LDL-C by 5-fold from 36 to 181 mg/dl, as compared with mice fed a ND (supplementary Fig. IA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet increases serum LDL-C levels in mice.
“Feeding mice a HCD for 4 weeks increased serum cholesterol levels by ∼2-fold from 122 to 240 mg/dl and serum LDL-C by 5-fold from 36 to 181 mg/dl, as compared with mice fed a ND (supplementary Fig. IA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Ad-shHNRNPD infection increased bioluminescence signal 4.2-fold over control virus in Alb-Luc-UTR mice.
“Figure 4B is the summarized imaging results (mean ± SEM) showing that Ad-shHNRNPD infection increased bioluminescence signal 4.2-fold over the control virus (P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A high cholesterol diet does not change hepatic HuR mRNA or protein levels in hamsters.
“As observed in the mouse diet study, we did not detect changes in mRNA or protein levels of HuR in hamster livers upon HCD feeding (supplementary Fig. II).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In AML12 cells, 24-OHC or 24,25-EC caused no substantial changes in HNRNPD mRNA levels despite huge increases in Idol and ABCA1 mRNA.
“Similar to the finding in HepG2 cells, we observed no substantial changes in HNRNPD mRNA levels in AML12 cells after 24 h treatment with 24-OHC or 24,25-EC, despite huge increases in Idol and ABCA1 mRNA levels (supplementary Fig. VI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
There was a strong inverse correlation of HNRNPD cellular abundance with LDLR mRNA levels in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected C57BL/6J mice.
“Because our results showed the strong inverse correlation of HNRNPD cellular abundance with LDLR mRNA levels in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected C57BL/6J mice, it was crucial to demonstrate that the effect of HNRNPD was indeed mediated through LDLR3′UTR without the involvement of LDLR gene transcription in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Compared with normolipidemic mice, reduction of hepatic HNRNPD protein in hyperlipidemic mice produced greater lowering of serum TC (−18.2% vs −8%) and LDL-C (−30% vs −13.2%).
“Our results clearly showed that compared with normolipidemic mice, reduction of hepatic HNRNPD protein in hyperlipidemic mice produced greater effects on elevation of liver LDLR mRNA levels (2.6-fold in HCD mice vs. 1.7-fold in ND mice) and on lowering serum TC (−18.2% vs. −8%) and LDL-C (−30% vs. −13.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
RSV had no effect on HNRNPD expression in HepG2 and AML12 cells.
“Gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR shows that cholesterol supplementation increased HNRNPD mRNA levels to 131% (P < 0.001) of control in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5A) and elevated HNRNPD mRNA levels to 133% (P < 0.001) of control in AML12 cells (Fig. 5B) while RSV had no effect on HNRNPD expression in both cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In Alb-Luc-UTR mice, hepatic mRNA levels of HNRNPI and KSRP were not affected by Ad-shHNRNPD injection.
“As observed in C57BL/6J mice, hepatic mRNA levels of other mRNA binding proteins (HNRNPI, KSRP) were not affected by Ad-shHNRNPD injection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In HepG2 cells, 24-OHC and 24,25-EC markedly elevated Idol and ABCA1 mRNA levels.
“Figure 5C shows that mRNA levels of inducible degrader of the LDLR (Idol) and ABCA1 were markedly elevated in cells treated with 24-OHC and 24,25-EC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
In HepG2 cells, oxysterols strongly repressed mRNA levels of SREBP2 target genes LDLR, PCSK9, and SREBP2.
“As we expected, mRNA levels of SREBP2 target genes, including LDLR, PCSK9, and SREBP2, were strongly repressed by oxysterols.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Compared with normolipidemic mice, reduction of hepatic HNRNPD protein in hyperlipidemic mice produced greater elevation of liver LDLR mRNA levels (2.6-fold vs 1.7-fold).
“Our results clearly showed that compared with normolipidemic mice, reduction of hepatic HNRNPD protein in hyperlipidemic mice produced greater effects on elevation of liver LDLR mRNA levels (2.6-fold in HCD mice vs. 1.7-fold in ND mice) and on lowering serum TC (−18.2% vs. −8%) and LDL-C (−30% vs. −13.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ RESULTS
Alb-Luc-UTR is a unique in vivo model to study the function of 3′UTR in mediating LDLR mRNA decay in liver tissue.
“Alb-Luc-UTR is a unique in vivo model to study the function of 3′UTR in mediating LDLR mRNA decay in liver tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Singh, 2014, The Critical role of mRNA destabilizing protein heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D in 3′ untranslated region-mediated decay of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in liver tissue, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract
Dietary cholesterol inhibits liver LDLR expression via inducing HNRNPD to accelerate LDLR mRNA degradation.
“Altogether, this work identifies a novel posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism by which dietary cholesterol inhibits liver LDLR expression via inducing HNRNPD to accelerate LDLR mRNA degradation.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“This work provides the first evidence suggesting that dietary cholesterol inhibits LDLR gene expression through the dual action mechanisms of transcriptional suppression and acceleration of mRNA decay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
- Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
HNRNPD plays a key role in modulation of hepatic LDLR expression under hypercholesterolemic conditions.
“Taken together, these results provided the first in vivo evidence demonstrating a key role of HNRNPD in modulation of hepatic LDLR expression under hypercholesterolemic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
Animals respond to a cholesterol-enriched diet by increasing HNRNPD expression in liver tissues where LDLR expressions are reduced.
“Altogether, these results demonstrate, for the first time, that animals responded to a cholesterol-enriched diet by increasing HNRNPD expression in liver tissues where LDLR expressions were reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
Food intake is not a causing factor for reduced serum cholesterol levels in Ad-shHNRNPD-injected hypercholesterolemic mice.
“thereby ruling out the influence of food intake as a causing factor for reduced serum cholesterol levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
In this mouse model, depletion of HNRNPD can overcome dietary cholesterol-mediated repression of hepatic LDLR.
“These data suggest that in this mouse model, depletion of HNRNPD can overcome dietary cholesterol-mediated repression of hepatic LDLR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Abstract
The stability of LDLR mRNA is modulated through its 3′ UTR.
“The stability of LDLR mRNA is modulated through its 3′ untranslated region (UTR)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Yamamoto, 1984, The human LDL receptor: A cysteine-rich protein with multiple Alu sequence in its mRNA, Cell. source
- Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
Feeding animals a HCD specifically and uniformly elevated the expression of HNRNPD in liver tissue.
“These investigations led us to discover that feeding animals a HCD, specifically and uniformly elevated the expression of HNRNPD in liver tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
- Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
Stabilizing LDLR mRNA by blocking HNRNPD-mediated mRNA decay might be a viable means to increase hepatic LDLR activity to remove excessive LDL-C from the circulation when intracellular cholesterol is elevated and SREBP is repressed.
“These new findings suggest that when the intracellular cholesterol level is elevated due to HCD and the SREBP pathway is repressed, stabilizing LDLR mRNA by blocking HNRNPD-mediated mRNA decay might be a viable means to increase hepatic LDLR activity to remove excessive LDL-C from the circulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Alb-Luc-UTR transgenic mouse is the first in vivo model to exclusively study the function of 3′UTR in liver tissue in living mice.
“Our Alb-Luc-UTR transgenic mouse is the first in vivo model to exclusively study the function of 3′UTR in liver tissue in living mice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Singh, 2014, The Critical role of mRNA destabilizing protein heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D in 3′ untranslated region-mediated decay of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in liver tissue, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The two-tier regulation at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels likely represents a natural response of liver tissue to cholesterol-enriched diets to reduce LDLR-mediated cholesterol uptake from circulation to maintain cellular cholesterol homeostasis.
“This unique two-tier regulation at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels likely represents a natural response of liver tissue to cholesterol-enriched diets to reduce LDLR-mediated cholesterol uptake from circulation in order to maintain cellular cholesterol homeostasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
- Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
In vivo data validated that Ad-shHNRNPD acts by reducing HNRNPD-mediated LDLR mRNA degradation through 3′UTR.
“These in vivo data clearly validated the action mechanism of Ad-shHNRNPD via reducing HNRNPD-mediated LDLR mRNA degradation through 3′UTR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
- It may state two separate claims as one. 22
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ AbstractSome ARE-binding proteins are mRNA destabilizing inducers, while others can protect the mRNA from endonuclease cleavage.
“Some ARE-BPs are mRNA destabilizing inducers, while others can protect the mRNA from endonuclease cleavage”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Barreau, 2005, Survey and summary AU-rich elements and associated factors: are there unifying principles?, Nucleic Acids Res. source
The paper’s ‘Functional Relationships Between ARE-BPs’ section says that most identified ARE-binding proteins have been implicated in mRNA degradation, while its ‘Hu family’ section reports that HuR binding increases mRNA stability. It does not say that stabilizing proteins protect mRNA specifically from endonuclease cleavage; the degradation mechanisms it discusses include deadenylation and exonuclease activity. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Zhang, 2002, AU-rich element-mediated translational control: complexity and multiple activity of trans-activating factors, Biochem. Soc. Trans. source
- cites [20] Meyer, 2004, Messenger RNA turnover in eukaryotes: pathways and enzymes, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. source
Probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ AbstractIncreased hepatic LDLR expression results in improved clearance of plasma LDL-C through receptor-mediated endocytosis.
“Increased hepatic LDLR expression results in improved clearance of plasma LDL-C through receptor-mediated endocytosis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Marcoux, 1998, Plasma remnant-like particle lipid and apolipoprotein levels in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic subjects, Atherosclerosis. source
- cites [5] Homma, 2004, Predictors of atherosclerosis, J. Atheroscler. Thromb. source
The Plasma Lipoproteins section discusses LDL-C as a clinical measure and LDL levels as a coronary risk factor, but does not address hepatic LDLR expression or LDL clearance. Searches for LDL receptor, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and clearance found no passage establishing the claimed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ AbstractIncreased hepatic LDLR expression is strongly associated with a decreased risk of developing cardiovascular disease in humans.
“which is strongly associated with a decreased risk of developing cardiovascular disease in humans”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Marcoux, 1998, Plasma remnant-like particle lipid and apolipoprotein levels in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic subjects, Atherosclerosis. source
- cites [5] Homma, 2004, Predictors of atherosclerosis, J. Atheroscler. Thromb. source
The Plasma Lipoproteins section says that elevated plasma LDL is a risk factor for coronary artery disease and recommends reducing LDL cholesterol in certain high-risk subjects. It does not address hepatic LDL receptor (LDLR) expression or an association between increased expression and reduced cardiovascular disease risk in humans (searched: hepatic LDL receptor expression; LDL receptor liver expression). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONOver-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver prevents proteolytic activation of SREBPs and leads to a decline in expression of SREBP target genes, including LDLR and SREBP2 itself.
“Over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver prevents the proteolytic activation of SREBPs and leads to a decline in the expression of SREBP target genes, including LDLR and SREBP2 itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Korn, 1998, Blunted feedback suppression of SREBP processing by dietary cholesterol in transgenic mice expressing sterol-resistant SCAP(D443N), J. Clin. Invest. source
The Results (page not specified) show that a cholesterol/cholic acid diet sharply reduced nuclear SREBP-2 in wild-type mouse liver and reduced LDL receptor mRNA by 20%. The paper does not report that dietary cholesterol reduced SREBP-2 gene expression itself; the Discussion describes SREBP-2 self-regulation as a possibility. Suppression was also blunted, rather than complete, in the SCAP(D443N) transgenic mice. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [13] Sheng, 1995, Independent regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins 1 and 2 in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
The Abstract (p. 935) says sterol overloading blocks proteolytic processing of both SREBPs in cultured cells and identifies LDLR as a gene whose transcription SREBPs activate. It contrasts those findings with non-coordinated regulation in hamster liver; it does not show that dietary cholesterol accumulation in liver blocks both SREBPs or lowers expression of LDLR and SREBP2 itself. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] Shimomura, 1997, Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONKnocking down HNRNPD, HNRNPI, or KSRP in HepG2 cells resulted in elevations of LDLR mRNA.
“Knocking down each of these proteins in HepG2 cells resulted in elevations of LDLR mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Li, 2009, Identification of mRNA-binding proteins that regulate the stability of LDL receptor mRNA through AU-rich elements, J. Lipid Res. source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ RESULTSAd-shHNRNPD injection does not significantly change body weight or food intake in hypercholesterolemic mice.
“Measurements of body weight and food intake throughout the treatments did not detect significant changes associated with Ad-shHNRNPD injection (supplementary Fig. IIIA, B), thereby ruling out the influence of food intake as a causing factor for reduced serum cholesterol levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ RESULTSHNRNPD depletion increased liver LDLR protein by 136% in ND-fed livers and by 119% in HCD-fed livers compared with control mice fed ND.
“Depletion of HNRNPD resulted in a 136% (P < 0.001) increase in ND-fed livers and a 119% (P < 0.01) increase in HCD-fed livers as compared with LDLR protein levels in control mice fed a ND (supplementary Fig. V).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic LDLR mRNA level increases to 260% of control.
“Figure 2D shows that in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice, mRNA levels of p37 and p45 isoforms were both significantly reduced to approximately 40% of that in control mice (P < 0.001), which was associated with a marked increase in the LDLR mRNA level to 260% of control (P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn Ad-shHNRNPD-infected hypercholesterolemic mice, hepatic mRNA levels of p37 and p45 HNRNPD isoforms are reduced to approximately 40% of control.
“Figure 2D shows that in Ad-shHNRNPD-infected mice, mRNA levels of p37 and p45 isoforms were both significantly reduced to approximately 40% of that in control mice (P < 0.001), which was associated with a marked increase in the LDLR mRNA level to 260% of control (P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONOxysterols (LXR activators) and RSV (SREBP2 activator) did not alter HNRNPD mRNA expression in cultured hepatic cells.
“None of these treatments altered HNRNPD mRNA expression in cultured hepatic cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn Alb-Luc-UTR mice, HNRNPD shRNA reduced p45 and p37 mRNA levels and increased Luc-UTR mRNA (2.1-fold) and endogenous LDLR mRNA (1.8-fold).
“Similar to C57BL/6J mice, expression of HNRNPD shRNA in the liver of Alb-Luc-UTR mice resulted in marked reductions of p45 and p37 mRNA levels with corresponding increases of Luc-UTR mRNA level (2.1-fold of control) and mouse endogenous LDLR mRNA level (1.8-fold of control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ RESULTSCholesterol supplementation increased HNRNPD mRNA levels to 131% of control in HepG2 cells and to 133% in AML12 cells.
“Gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR shows that cholesterol supplementation increased HNRNPD mRNA levels to 131% (P < 0.001) of control in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5A) and elevated HNRNPD mRNA levels to 133% (P < 0.001) of control in AML12 cells (Fig. 5B) while RSV had no effect on HNRNPD expression in both cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn HepG2 cells, HNRNPD mRNA levels were unchanged by 24,25-EC at 10 and 20 μM and only elevated approximately 10% by 24-OHC.
“Surprisingly, HNRNPD mRNA levels were unchanged by 24,25-EC at both 10 and 20 μM concentrations and were only elevated approximately 10% over control by 24-OHC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONHNRNPD mRNA levels were consistently elevated in hepatic cell lines by cholesterol, but increases were relatively modest compared with in vivo data.
“We consistently detected elevations of HNRNPD mRNA levels in these hepatic cell lines, but the increases were relatively modest as compared with in vivo data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn HepG2 and AML12 cells, LDLR mRNA levels were suppressed by cholesterol treatment and strongly elevated by RSV.
“In contrast to HNRNPD, LDLR mRNA levels were suppressed by cholesterol treatment and were strongly elevated by RSV.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ AbstractIntracellular cholesterol levels play a primary role in determining hepatic LDLR expression levels through a negative feedback mechanism controlling gene transcription mediated by SRE in the LDLR promoter and SREBPs.
“many studies have demonstrated that intracellular cholesterol levels play a primary role in determination of hepatic LDLR expression levels through a negative feedback mechanism that controls gene transcription mediated by the sterol-regulatory element (SRE) located in LDLR promoter and SRE binding proteins (SREBPs)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Brown, 1997, The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of the membrane bound transcription factor, Cell. source
- cites [7] Brown, 1999, A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ AbstractHuR is a stabilizing factor for LDLR mRNA.
“A recent new study identified human antigen R (HuR) as a stabilizing factor for LDLR mRNA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Yashiro, 2013, 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside stabilizes low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in hepatocytes via ERK-dependent HuR binding to an AU-rich element, Atherosclerosis. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ RESULTSHNRNPD protein has four isoforms, p37, p40, p42, and p45, generated by alternative precursor mRNA splicing.
“HNRNPD protein has four isoforms, p37, p40, p42, and p45, generated by alterative precursor mRNA splicing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [30] Gratacós, 2010, The role of AUF1 in regulated mRNA decay, RNA. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [31] Loflin, 1999, Unraveling a cytoplasmic role for hnRNP D in the in vivo mRNA destabilization directed by the AU-rich element, Genes Dev. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [32] Barker, 2012, Sequence requirements for RNA binding by HuR and AUF1, J. Biochem. source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ AbstractmRNA stability plays a key role in the control of gene expression both by setting the basal level of gene expression and as a site of regulatory responses.
“It is well-known that mRNA stability plays a key role in the control of gene expression both by setting the basal level of gene expression and as a site of regulatory responses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Parker, 2004, The enzyme and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. source
Probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ AbstractThe expression of liver LDLR regulates human plasma LDL-cholesterol homeostasis.
“The expression of liver LDL receptor (LDLR) regulates human plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) homeostasis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ AbstractOver-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver inhibits SREBP-mediated LDLR gene transcription, leading to reduced hepatic LDLR mRNA levels in hypercholesterolemic animals.
“It is well-established that over-accumulation of dietary cholesterol in the liver inhibits sterol-regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-mediated LDL receptor (LDLR) gene transcription leading to a reduced hepatic LDLR mRNA level in hypercholesterolemic animals.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“While this decrease in LDLR mRNA abundance has been attributed to the transcriptional suppression due to the inhibition of proteolytic processing of SREBP”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] Shimomura, 1997, Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
- cites [15] Korn, 1998, Blunted feedback suppression of SREBP processing by dietary cholesterol in transgenic mice expressing sterol-resistant SCAP(D443N), J. Clin. Invest. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ RESULTSIn mouse liver tissue and mouse primary hepatocytes, only the p37 and p45 HNRNPD isoforms could be detected.
“In mouse liver tissue and mouse primary hepatocytes, only the p37 and p45 isoforms could be detected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Singh, 2014, The Critical role of mRNA destabilizing protein heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D in 3′ untranslated region-mediated decay of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in liver tissue, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ RESULTSEliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.
“Collectively, the results of protein and mRNA analyses from ND and HCD mice clearly demonstrate that cholesterol feeding elevates the LDLR mRNA degrading protein HNRNPD, and that eliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into a substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ AbstractIn HepG2 cells, HuR bound to the proximal ARE site of LDLR 3′UTR and led to an increase in LDLR mRNA half-life.
“It was shown in HepG2 cells that HuR bound to the proximal ARE site of LDLR 3′UTR and led to an increase in LDLR mRNA half-life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Yashiro, 2013, 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside stabilizes low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in hepatocytes via ERK-dependent HuR binding to an AU-rich element, Atherosclerosis. source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ RESULTSHepatic depletion of HNRNPD produced a modest yet significant impact on LDLR expression and on LDLR-mediated removal of serum cholesterol under normolipidemic conditions.
“Collectively, these data demonstrated that hepatic depletion of HNRNPD produced a modest yet significant impact on LDLR expression and on LDLR-mediated removal of serum cholesterol under normolipidemic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ AbstractHNRNPD, HNRNPI, and KSRP are decay-promoting factors that bind to ARE sequences of LDLR 3′UTR and accelerate LDLR mRNA decay in HepG2 cells.
“Our previous studies have identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP)D, HNRNPI, and KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP) as decay-promoting factors that bind to ARE sequences of LDLR 3′UTR and accelerate the mRNA decay in HepG2 cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Li, 2009, Identification of mRNA-binding proteins that regulate the stability of LDL receptor mRNA through AU-rich elements, J. Lipid Res. source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ AbstractThe LDLR mRNA 3′ UTR harbors four AU-rich elements (AREs) that are docking sites for cytoplasmic ARE-binding proteins.
“This region harbors four adenylate-uridylate (AU)-rich elements (AREs)”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“that are docking sites for cytoplasmic ARE-binding proteins (ARE-BPs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Wilson, 1998, Stabilization and cytoskeletal-association of LDL receptor mRNA are mediated by distinct domains in its 3′ untranslated region, J. Lipid Res. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [9] Wilson, 1997, Modulation of LDL receptor mRNA stability by phorbol esters in human liver cell culture models, J. Lipid Res. source
- cites [17] Yashiro, 2011, Chenodeoxycholic acid stabilization of LDL receptor mRNA depends on 3′-untranslated region and AU-rich element-binding protein, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. source
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSIONThe results demonstrate the key role of HNRNPD in regulation of lipid metabolism by targeting LDLR and unravel its regulation by dietary cholesterol in liver tissue.
“The results of our current studies not only demonstrate the key role of HNRNPD in regulation of lipid metabolism by targeting LDLR, but also unravel its regulation by dietary cholesterol in liver tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ RESULTSIn cultured hepatic cells, HNRNPD mRNA expression was modestly and consistently elevated by cholesterol, but did not respond to activators of LXR or SREBP.
“Altogether, these results show that in cultured hepatic cells, HNRNPD mRNA expression was modestly and consistently elevated by cholesterol, but it did not respond to activators of LXR or SREBP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSIONThe significant induction of HNRNPD mRNA and protein by HCD in both mice and hamsters suggests that HNRNPD might contribute to downregulation of LDLR mRNA levels in cholesterol-loaded livers.
“The significant induction of HNRNPD mRNA and protein by a HCD in both mice and hamsters suggested that this mRNA decay-promoting protein might contribute to the downregulation of LDLR mRNA levels in cholesterol-loaded livers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ RESULTSActivation of LXR by oxysterols positively regulates LXR target genes and inhibits SREBP processing.
“Activation of LXR by oxysterols positively regulates LXR target genes and inhibits SREBP processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Jakobsson, 2012, Liver X receptor biology and pharmacology: new pathways, challenges and opportunities, Trends Pharmacol. Sci. source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSIONDietary cholesterol reduces liver LDLR mRNA through dual action mechanisms of transcriptional suppression and acceleration of mRNA decay mediated by HNRNPD.
“The results from this current study demonstrate, for the first time, that dietary cholesterol reduces liver LDLR mRNA through dual action mechanisms of transcriptional suppression and acceleration of mRNA decay mediated by HNRNPD, the LDLR mRNA decay promoting ARE binding protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover to further repress LDLR expression in liver tissue.
“However, it is unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover to further repress LDLR expression in liver tissue.”
“it is currently unknown whether elevated cholesterol levels can also elicit a cellular response to increase LDLR mRNA turnover rate as a rapid means to lower LDLR expression and to further reduce cholesterol uptake from outside of cells.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is no literature report describing the effect of sterols on the expression or activity of these LDLR mRNA binding proteins.
“To date, there is no literature report describing the effect of sterols on the expression or activity of these LDLR mRNA binding proteins.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effects of the high-cholesterol diet on HNRNPD expression are attributable to its cholesterol content rather than other dietary components.
“Collectively, the results of protein and mRNA analyses from ND and HCD mice clearly demonstrate that cholesterol feeding elevates the LDLR mRNA degrading protein HNRNPD, and that eliminating HNRNPD in cholesterol-loaded liver produced stronger effects in restoring LDLR mRNA and protein levels, which translated into a substantially improved removal of serum LDL-C in hypercholesterolemic mice.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high cholesterol diet increases hepatic expression of hnRNP D in murine models, which leads to degradation of LDLR mRNA, whereas adenovirus-mediated depletion of hnRNP D decreased circulating LDL levels.
“More recently, it has been shown that high cholesterol diet increases hepatic expression of hnRNP D in murine models which in turn leads to degradation of LDLR mRNA, whereas adenovirus mediated depletion of hnRNP D decreased circulating LDL levels63.”
From Pathways and Molecular Mechanisms Governing LDL Receptor Regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
LDLR percentage increases use incompatible baselines
MinorThe stated 25% decrease puts the HCD control at 75% of the ND control. A 119% increase over the ND control would put the treated HCD group at 219% of the ND control-not 159% of the HCD control or a 159% increase over it. The 159% figure fits only if 119% denotes the final level rather than an increase.
“Results showed that a cholesterol diet lowered LDLR by 25% (P < 0.001) as compared with the ND group in Ad-shGFP-infected mice. Depletion of HNRNPD resulted in a 136% (P < 0.001) increase in ND-fed livers and a 119% (P < 0.01) increase in HCD-fed livers as compared with LDLR protein levels in control mice fed a ND (supplementary Fig. V).”
“Again, the increase in LDLR abundance by HNRNPD depletion was higher when compared with HCD control groups (159%).”
Citations
Cites
A Receptor-Mediated Pathway for Cholesterol Homeostasis
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3513311 · Cited by 5,703
Regulation of the mevalonate pathway
Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/343425a0 · Cited by 5,394
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80213-5 · Cited by 3,834
Kong, W., Wei, J., Abidi, P., Lin, M., Inaba, S., Li, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Si, S., Pan, H., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1135 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationThe human LDL receptor: A cysteine-rich protein with multiple Alu sequences in its mRNA
Yamamoto, T., Davis, C. G., Brown, M. S., Schneider, W. J., Casey, M. L., Goldstein, J. L., & Russell, D. W. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · Cited by 1,382
A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041 · Cited by 1,134
AU-rich elements and associated factors: are there unifying principles?
Barreau, C. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki1012 · Cited by 907
The enzymes and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover
Parker, R., & Song, H. (2004) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb724 · Cited by 730
Spann, N. J., Garmire, L. X., McDonald, J. G., Myers, D. S., Milne, S. B., Shibata, N., Reichart, D. R., Fox, J. N., Shaked, I., Heudobler, D., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.054 · Cited by 628
Messenger RNA Turnover in Eukaryotes: Pathways and Enzymes
Meyer, S., Temme, C., & Wahle, E. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230490513991 · Cited by 342
Liver X receptor biology and pharmacology: new pathways, challenges and opportunities
Jakobsson, T., Treuter, E., Gustafsson, J.-Å., & Steffensen, K. R. (2012) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.013 · Cited by 302
Independent regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins 1 and 2 in hamster liver.
Sheng, Z., Otani, H., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.4.935 · Cited by 265
Loflin, P., Chen, C.-Y. A., & Shyu, A.-B. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.14.1884 · Cited by 246
Roles of AUF1 isoforms, HuR and BRF1 in ARE-dependent mRNA turnover studied by RNA interference
Raineri, I. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh282 · Cited by 198
The role of AUF1 in regulated mRNA decay
Gratacós, F. M., & Brewer, G. (2010) · WIREs RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.26 · Cited by 193
Zhang, T., Kruys, V., Huez, G., & Gueydan, C. (2002) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0300952 · Cited by 178
Pont, A. R., Sadri, N., Hsiao, S. J., Smith, S., & Schneider, R. J. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019 · Cited by 139
Shimomura, I., Bashmakov, Y., Shimano, H., Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.23.12354 · Cited by 132
Lin, S., Wang, W., Wilson, G. M., Yang, X., Brewer, G., Holbrook, N. J., & Gorospe, M. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.21.7903-7913.2000 · Cited by 132
Li, H., Chen, W., Zhou, Y., Abidi, P., Sharpe, O., Robinson, W. H., Kraemer, F. B., & Liu, J. (2009) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m800375-jlr200 · Cited by 85
Self-citationIdentification of a signature motif in target mRNAs of RNA-binding protein AUF1
Mazan-Mamczarz, K., Kuwano, Y., Zhan, M., White, E. J., Martindale, J. L., Lal, A., & Gorospe, M. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn929 · Cited by 70
Identification of a set of KSRP target transcripts upregulated by PI3K-AKT signaling
Ruggiero, T., Trabucchi, M., Ponassi, M., Corte, G., Chen, C., Al‐Haj, L., Khabar, K. S. A., Briata, P., & Gherzi, R. (2007) · BMC Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2199-8-28 · Cited by 63
KSRP, many functions for a single protein
Briata, P. (2010) · Frontiers in bioscience · doi:10.2741/3821 · Cited by 60
Sequence requirements for RNA binding by HuR and AUF1
Barker, A., Epis, M. R., Porter, C. J., Hopkins, B. R., Wilce, M. C. J., Wilce, J. A., Giles, K. M., & Leedman, P. J. (2012) · The Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1093/jb/mvs010 · Cited by 59
Korn, B. S., Shimomura, I., Bashmakov, Y., Hammer, R. E., Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci5341 · Cited by 56
Wilson, G. M., Vasa, M. Z., & Deeley, R. G. (1998) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)33870-0 · Cited by 54
Homma, Y. (2004) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.11.265 · Cited by 52
Hepatic clearance of plasma low density lipoproteins
Spady, D. (1992) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1040407 · Cited by 46
Dong, B., Kan, C. F. K., Singh, A. B., & Liu, J. (2013) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m032599 · Cited by 46
Self-citationMarcoux, C., Tremblay, M., Fredenrich, A., Jacques, H., Krimbou, L., Nakajima, K., Davignon, J., & Cohn, J. S. (1998) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/s0021-9150(98)00042-2 · Cited by 45
Modulation of LDL receptor mRNA stability by phorbol esters in human liver cell culture models
Wilson, G. M., Roberts, E. A., & Deeley, R. G. (1997) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)37252-7 · Cited by 34
Singh, A. B., Li, H., Kan, C. F. K., Dong, B., Nicolls, M. R., & Liu, J. (2014) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.112.301131 · Cited by 32
Self-citationYashiro, T., Nanmoku, M., Shimizu, M., Inoue, J., & Sato, R. (2013) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.033 · Cited by 32
Goto, D., Okimoto, T., Ono, M., Shimotsu, H., Abe, K., Tsujita, Y., & Kuwano, M. (1997) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.17.11.2707 · Cited by 23
Yashiro, T., Yokoi, Y., Shimizu, M., Inoue, J., & Sato, R. (2011) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.04.006 · Cited by 18
Zucconi, B. E., & Wilson, G. M. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.489559 · Cited by 15
Marcoux, C., Tremblay, M., Jacques, H., Fredenrich, A., Nakajima, K., Davignon, J., & Cohn, J. S. (1997) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/s0021-9150(97)89769-9
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Võsa, U., Claringbould, A., Westra, H.-J., Bonder, M. J., Deelen, P., Zeng, B., Kirsten, H., Saha, A., Kreuzhuber, R., Yazar, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00913-z · Cited by 2,607
Unraveling the polygenic architecture of complex traits using blood eQTL metaanalysis
Võsa, U., Claringbould, A., Westra, H.-J., Bonder, M. J., Deelen, P., Zeng, B., Kirsten, H., Saha, A., Kreuzhuber, R., Kasela, S., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/447367 · Cited by 2,607
Hepatic cholesterol transport and its role in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerosis
Li, H., Yu, X.-H., Ou, X., Ouyang, X.-P., & Tang, C. (2021) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101109 · Cited by 237
Dong, B., Li, H., Singh, A. B., Cao, A., & Liu, J. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.597229 · Cited by 158
Self-citationBriand, F., Mayoux, E., Brousseau, E., Burr, N., Urbain, I., Costard, C., Mark, M., & Sulpice, T. (2016) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db16-0049 · Cited by 118
Cha, S., Park, Y., Yun, J., Lim, T., Song, K., Yoo, K., Ahn, Y., & Ko, S. (2017) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s12944-017-0443-4 · Cited by 105
Shende, V. R., Wu, M., Singh, A. B., Dong, B., Kan, C. F. K., & Liu, J. (2015) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m052969 · Cited by 64
Self-citationZhu, T., Zhou, Q., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, X., Shen, Y., Jiao, L., Tocher, D. R., & Jin, M. (2022) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2022.05.001 · Cited by 47
Singh, A. B., Kan, C. F. K., Kraemer, F. B., Sobel, R. A., & Liu, J. (2019) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00503.2018 · Cited by 42
Self-citationLee, K., Chun, S., Kwon, Y., Kim, S., & Nam, K. (2017) · Molecular Medicine Reports · doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.6317 · Cited by 36
Dong, B., Singh, A. B., Azhar, S., Seidah, N. G., & Liu, J. (2015) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.013 · Cited by 35
Self-citationSingh, A. B., Dong, B., Kraemer, F. B., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2018) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.118.311122 · Cited by 31
Self-citationPathways and Molecular Mechanisms Governing LDL Receptor Regulation
Schmidt, H. M., Jarrett, K. E., de Aguiar Vallim, T. Q., & Tarling, E. J. (2025) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.124.323578 · Cited by 33
Yang, J. H., Cho, S. S., Kim, K. M., Kim, J. Y., Kim, E. J., Park, E., Lee, J. H., & Ki, S. H. (2017) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2017.09.053 · Cited by 32
Fang, W., Wen, X., Meng, Q., Liu, L., Xie, J., Zhang, H., & Everaert, N. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10020359 · Cited by 29
Effects of long-term heat exposure on cholesterol metabolism and immune responses in growing pigs
Wen, X., Wu, W., Fang, W., Tang, S., Xin, H., Xie, J., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103857 · Cited by 24
Singh, A. B., Dong, B., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2018) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.12.012 · Cited by 23
Self-citationInfluence of Varied Dietary Cholesterol Levels on Lipid Metabolism in Hamsters
Huang, C., Hsu, H.-S., & Chiang, M. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16152472 · Cited by 19
Li, X., & Li, M. (2024) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph17081073 · Cited by 17
Fan, Y., Cai, Y., Wong, H. K., Chen, X. Y., Huang, I. B., Vanhoutte, P. M., Xia, Z., Xu, A., & Tang, E. H. C. (2018) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.06.003 · Cited by 14
Shende, V. R., Singh, A. B., & Liu, J. (2015) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20150666 · Cited by 13
Self-citationFunes, A. K., Avena, M. V., Ibáñez, J. E., Simón, L., Ituarte, L. M. E., Colombo, R., Roldán, A., Conte, M. I., Monclus, M. A., Boarelli, P. V., et al. (2023) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.13398 · Cited by 11
Ishaka, A., Imam, M. U., Ismail, M., Mahmud, R., & Bakar, Z. A. (2016) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2016.08.015 · Cited by 8
Triciribine Engages ZFP36L1 and HuR to Stabilize LDLR mRNA
Sundvold, H. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25194505 · Cited by 5
Abd-Ulhussein, H., & Rizij, F. A. (2019) · Medical Journal of Babylon · doi:10.4103/mjbl.mjbl_104_18 · Cited by 5
Kim, J., Jeong, H., Ray, N., Kim, K., & Moon, Y. (2024) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.88586 · Cited by 5
Sex-specific alterations in hepatic cholesterol metabolism in low birth weight adult guinea pigs
Sarr, O., Mathers, K. E., Vanderboor, C., Wiggers, K. D., Devgan, A., Hardy, D. B., Zhao, L., & Regnault, T. R. H. (2021) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-021-01491-w · Cited by 5
Kim, Y. H., Kim, J., An, D. Y., Park, M., Jeong, G.-H., Jin, J., Kim, M. K., Chin, J., Choi, Y., & Park, K. (2026) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-026-01740-0 · Cited by 1
Ti, K., Zhao, Y., Tan, E., & Ma, D. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27146254 · Cited by 1
Jiménez, D. L. (2013) · Revista Aranzadi de derecho de deporte y entretenimiento
Chen, F., Zeng, C., Guo, H., Tian, N., Xu, Q., Zhan, X., Peng, F., Wang, X., Su, N., Feng, X., et al. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6590878/v1
Schmidt, H. M., Tarling, E. J., & Vallim, T. Q. D. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2512733122
Park, J. H., Cho, B. S., Zhou, X. B., Kyung, R., & Kim, M. J. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262010184
Liu, S., Zhang, J. J., Xu, T., Zhou, J., Wang, L., Wang, R., Liu, H., Wu, D., Wu, J., & Xiao, S. (2026) · Food Science and Human Wellness · doi:10.26599/fshw.2026.9250978
Rehman, M. A., Oduoye, M. O., Ozoemena, D. J., Danso, E. A., Chukwuka, G., & Odelade, M. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2026.1911458
Cold shock domain-containing protein E1 is a posttranscriptional regulator of the LDL receptor
Smith, G. A., Padmanabhan, A., Lau, B. H., Pampana, A., Li, L., Lee, C. Y., Pelonero, A., Nishino, T., Sadagopan, N., Xia, V. Q., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abj8670 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, A. B., Kan, C. F. K., Shende, V., Dong, B., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Jingwen
- Venue
- Journal of Lipid Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1397-1407
- ISSN
- 0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4076078
- OpenAlex
- W2106287709
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Lipid Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT006336, R01AT002543)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Keywords
- LDL receptor, dietary cholesterol, HNRNPD, post-transcriptional regulation, mRNA degradation, 3' untranslated region, hepatic gene expression, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol, SREBP
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cholesterol, Dietary, Gene Expression Regulation, Liver, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Receptors, LDL, 3' Untranslated Regions, RNA Stability, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review