Cited by 104Animal Behavior and ReproductionNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Alloparental care and the influence of father presence on juvenile prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster

Wang, Zuoxin, Novak, Melinda A.·1994·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/anbe.1994.1040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peptide specificity is achieved through a high binding affinity for the receptors, about 1000× higher than classical neurotransmitters.

    “Peptide specificity is achieved through a high binding affinity for the receptors, about 1000× higher than classical neurotransmitters [119, 132].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., & Novak, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-02
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
281-288
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040857400
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
alloparental care, Microtus ochrogaster, father presence, juvenile development, sibling contact, lactation, parental care, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review