Cited by 114Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Natural variation in early parental care correlates with social behaviors in adolescent prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

Open access
Perkeybile, Allison M., Griffin, Luana L., Bales, Karen L.·2013·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Natural variation in early parental care may contribute to long-term changes in behavior in the offspring. Here we investigate the role of variable early care in biparental prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Total amounts of parental care were initially quantified for 24 breeder pairs and pairs were ranked in relation to one another based on total contact. Consistency in key components of care suggested a trait-like quality to parental care. Based on this ranking, breeder pairs from the top (high-contact) and bottom (low-contact) quartiles were selected to produce high- and low-contact offspring to investigate adolescent behavior after varying early care. Parental care of subject offspring was again observed postnatally. Offspring of high-contact parents spent more time passively nursing and received more paternal non-huddling contact while low-contact offspring spent more time actively nursing and received more paternal huddling and pseudohuddling in the first postnatal days (PNDs). Low-contact offspring also displayed faster rates of development on a number of physical markers. Post-weaning, offspring were evaluated on anxiety-like behavior, social behavior and pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) to a tactile and an acoustic startle. High-contact offspring spent more time sniffing a juvenile and less time autogrooming. With an infant, high-contact offspring spent more time in non-huddling contact and less time autogrooming and retrieving than did low-contact offspring. Considering sexes separately, high-contact females spent more time sniffing a novel juvenile than low-contact females. High-contact males spent more time in non-huddling contact with an infant than low-contact males; while low-contact females retrieved infants more than high-contact females. In both measures of social behavior, high-contact males spent less time autogrooming than low-contact males. These results suggest a relationship between early-life care and differences in social behavior in adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00021

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voles receiving high parental care spend more time nursing and huddling with parents than those receiving low parental care.

    “Voles receiving high parental care spend more time nursing and huddling with parents than those receiving low parental care [63].”

    From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results (Early parental care of subject offspring, Figure 2; page not provided) report the opposite pattern for huddling: fathers of low-contact offspring spent more time huddling over pups. High-contact offspring spent more time in passive nursing postures, but low-contact offspring received more active nursing; the paper does not present the claimed across-the-board increase in nursing and huddling. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In adolescence, high-care voles investigate novel conspecifics more, whereas those receiving low early-life parental care display increased autogrooming in the presence of novel conspecifics.

    “In adolescence, high-care animals investigate novel conspecifics more, whereas those receiving low early-life parental care display increased autogrooming, a self-soothing behavior, in the presence of novel conspecifics.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hinde R. A. (1986). Some implications of evolutionary theory and comparative data for the study of human prosocial and aggressive behaviour, in Development of Anti-social and Prosocial Behaviour, eds Olweus D. Block J. Radke-Yarrow M. (Orlando, FL: Academic Press), 13– 32

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkeybile, A. M., Griffin, L. L., & Bales, K. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Perkeybile, Allison M.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007298889
Cited by
114
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011107)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD060117)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, biparental care, natural variation, adolescent social behavior, offspring development, nursing behavior, anxiety-like behavior, prepulse inhibition, startle response, autogrooming, sex differences, behavioral consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review