Cited by 83Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Intergenerational transmission of alloparental behavior and oxytocin and vasopressin receptor distribution in the prairie vole

Open access
Perkeybile, Allison M., Delaney-Busch, Nathanial, Hartman, Sarah, Grimm, Kevin J., Bales, Karen L.·2015·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Variation in the early environment has the potential to permanently alter offspring behavior and development. We have previously shown that naturally occurring variation in biparental care of offspring in the prairie vole is related to differences in social behavior of the offspring. It was not, however, clear whether the behavioral differences seen between offspring receiving high compared to low amounts of parental care were the result of different care experiences or were due to shared genetics with their high-contact or low-contact parents. Here we use cross-fostering methods to determine the mode of transmission of alloparental behavior and oxytocin receptor (OTR) and vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) binding from parent to offspring. Offspring were cross-fostered or in-fostered on postnatal day 1 and parental care received was quantified in the first week postpartum. At weaning, offspring underwent an alloparental care test and brains were then collected from all parents and offspring to examine OTR and V1aR binding. Results indicate that alloparental behavior of offspring was predicted by the parental behavior of their rearing parents. Receptor binding for both OTR and V1aR tended to be predicted by the genetic mothers for female offspring and by the genetic fathers for male offspring. These findings suggest a different, sex-dependent, role of early experience and genetics in shaping behavior compared to receptor distribution and support the notion of sex-dependent outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00191

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkeybile, A. M., Delaney-Busch, N., Hartman, S., Grimm, K. J., & Bales, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Perkeybile, Allison M.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2015-07-23
Volume
9
Pages
191-191
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1541979437
Cited by
76
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011107)
  • University of California, Davis
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD060117)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
intergenerational transmission, biparental care, oxytocin receptor, vasopressin V1a receptor, Microtus ochrogaster, cross-fostering, early life experience, genetic transmission, sex differences, social behavior, receptor binding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review