Cited by 1,126Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGame Theory and Voting SystemsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games.

Open access

Eckel, Catherine C., Grossman, Philip J.·1996·Games and Economic Behavior

DOI 10.1006/game.1996.0081

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/game.1996.0081

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 999

Fairness Concerns in Environmental Economics - Do They Really Matter and if so How?Preprint
Johansson‐Stenman, O., & Konow, J. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
Verified Trust: Reciprocity, Altruism and Noise in Trust GamesPreprint
Brülhart, M., & Usunier, J. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
Who's in Charge? Donor Targeting Enhances Voluntary Giving to GovernmentPreprint
Li, S. X., Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., et al. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2293407 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
The Industrial Organization of Corruption: Monopoly, Competition and CollusionPreprint
Ryvkin, D., & Serra, D. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2852523 · Cited by 6
Individual Differences in Allocation of Funds in the Dictator Game Associated with Length of the Arginine Vasopressin 1a Receptor (AVPR1a) RS3 Promoter-region and Correlation between RS3 Length and Hippocampal mRNAPreprint
Knafo‐Noam, A., Israel, S., Darvasi, A., Bachner‐Melman, R., Uzefovsky, F., Cohen, L., Feldman, E., Lerer, E., Laiba, E., Raz, Y., et al. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
Choosing Bargaining Partners - An experimental study on the impact of information about income and genderPreprint
Holm, H. J., & Engseld, P. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
The Relationship between Economic Preferences and Psychological Personality MeasuresPreprint
Becker, A., Deckers, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., & Kosse, F. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2042458 · Cited by 6
Mechanisms of social influence : reputation management in typical and autistic individuals
Cage, E. (2015) · IOE EPrints · Cited by 6
Ethical Consumption and Social Context: Experimental Evidence from Germany and the United StatesPreprint
Liebe, U., Andorfer, V. A., Gwartney, P. A., et al. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.7892/boris.65756 · Cited by 6
“However, positive giving behavior decreases considerably, or even reverses to taking, depending on the degree of anonymity in experimental situations, the nature of the recipient, social distance, and other factors (Eckel & Grossman 1996, 1996; List 2007).”
Background
Investor Valuation for Socially Responsible Assets: A Willingness to Pay Experiment
Brodback, D., Guenster, N. K., Pouget, S., & Wang, R. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.01349 · Cited by 43
Dissociating Facets of Self-Reported Altruism in India and Germany: Preliminary Evidence
Kinnunen, S. P., Singh, M., & Windmann, S. (2015) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-015-0309-7 · Cited by 4
Social Anxiety, Observed Performance, and Perceived Social Competencies in Late-Adolescent Friendships
Kuder, B. N., & Grover, R. L. (2014) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn19.1.10 · Cited by 6
Regulating Markets with Advice: An Experimental Study*
Gottschalk, F. C. H. (2020) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/obes.12383 · Cited by 5
Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games
Hackel, J., Yamamoto, H., Okada, I., Goto, A., & Taudes, A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249217 · Cited by 5
“provided as a type of incentive produced a positive effect on contributions, while in a principal-agent situation workers reciprocated with effort to match donations in a CSR (corporate social responsibility) context [25, 26].”
Background
The last will: Estate divisions as a testament of to whom altruism is directed
Elinder, M., Engström, P., & Erixson, O. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254492 · Cited by 6
Value Relevance of Environmental Sustainability Information Disclosure
Okonewa, O. (2023) · Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting · doi:10.9734/ajeba/2023/v23i8949 · Cited by 5
Evidence on need-sensitive giving behavior: An experimental approach to the acknowledgment of needs
Traub, S., Schwaninger, M. C., Paetzel, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102028 · Cited by 5
Behavioral consequences of religious schooling
Siddique, A. (2023) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103237 · Cited by 20
Considerations of Mutual Exchange in Prosocial Decision-Making
Allidina, S., Arbuckle, N. L., & Cunningham, W. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01216 · Cited by 5
States and Situations, Traits and Environments
Asendorpf, J. B., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.007 · Cited by 10
Personality, Preferences and Socioeconomic Behavior
Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.044 · Cited by 6
The UN in the lab
Kass, M. J., Fatás, E., Eckel, C. C., et al. (2014) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-014-0807-x · Cited by 5
“There is also some debate about the external validity of neutral framing, that norm activation and other psychology factors should be accounted for (see Eckel and Grossman 1996; Loomes 1999). experiment.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Less Expectation, Less Pain: Low Wealth Alleviates Sense of Unfairness
Pei, G., Jin, J. K., Li, T., & Fang, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571952 · Cited by 5
“Previous studies have shown that the need of others has a strong effect on fairness perception (Eckel and Grossman, 1996; Rodrigues et al., 2015).”
Background
Intra-Household Resource Allocation in Rural Tanzania: Why Women Care about Disclosure
D’Exelle, B., & Ignowski, L. (2022) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2022.2096441 · Cited by 5
“Some studies with university students found that women tend to be more generous than men (see, e.g. Bolton & Katok, 1995; Cox & Deck, 2007; Eckel & Grossman, 1996, 1998; Konow, Saijo, & Akai, 2008 and Croson & Gneezy, 2009, for a survey).”
Background
Instantaneous positive reinforcement does not increase donations: Evidence from online experiments
Grodeck, B., & Grossman, P. J. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.04.032 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Social preferences, accountability, and wage bargaining
Kocher, M. G., Poulsen, O. M., & Zizzo, D. J. (2017) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-017-1028-x · Cited by 5
Analyzing Moral Deliberation During Gameplay: Moral Foundations Theory as an Analytic Resource
Fennewald, T. J., & Phelps, D. (2017) · Games and Culture · doi:10.1177/1555412017745231 · Cited by 5
“…& Sprumont, 2002; Axelrod, 1980; Beal, Ghintran, Remila, & Solal, 2013; Bogost, 2008; Costikyan, 2010; Dray, Perez, Le Page, D’Aquino, & White, 2007; Eckel & Grossman, 1996; Hennig-Schmidt, Li, & Yang, 2004; Henrich, Heine, & Norenzayan, 2010; Nowak, Page, & Sigmund, 2000; Ostrom, Walker, &…”
Influence of Social Relationships on Decisions in Device-to-Device Communication
Keller, K., Ott, M., Hinz, O. F., & Klein, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3099857 · Cited by 5
“Altruism is a commonly studied character trait that can impact an individual’s interaction with others [38].”
BackgroundInfluential
Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
Brañas‐Garza, P., & Paz, E. M. (2006) · Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad · doi:10.13043/dys.58.7 · Cited by 5
“This literature started with Eckel & Grossman [11], who analyzed how individuals behave when the recipient is a wellknown and reputed institution: the Red Cross.”
Method
Donate, Everybody's Doing It: Social Influences on Charitable Giving
Partika, A. C. (2017) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2325-7342.jn22.1.39 · Cited by 6
“This experimental design was based on experimental methodology from the behavioral economics dictator game (Eckel & Grossman, 1996; Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat, & Smith, 1994; Hoffman, McCabe, & Smith, 1996).”
Method
Time Preferences in Decisions for Others
Rau, H. A. (2020) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109766 · Cited by 5
On the behavioural relevance of optional and mandatory impure public goods : results from a laboratory experiment
Engelmann, D., Munro, A., & Valente, M. (2011) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.24545/00001074 · Cited by 5
Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Tax Evasion Opportunities and Labor SupplyPreprint
Doerrenberg, P., & Duncan, D. R. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2158742 · Cited by 5
“Eckel and Grossman (1996) show that dictators share more in dictator games if the recipient is the American Red Cross.”
On Measuring Compassion in Social Preferences Do Gender, Price of Giving, or Inequality Matter?Preprint
Kamas, L., & Preston, A. E. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1357784 · Cited by 5
Demand for Giving to Multiple Charities: An Experimental StudyPreprint
Filiz‐Ozbay, E., & Uler, N. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2782143 · Cited by 5
Developing and validating a scale of altruistic leadership
Zheltoukhova, K. (2016) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 5
Corruption, Social Judgment and Culture: An ExperimentPreprint
Salmon, T. C., & Serra, D. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2383903
The Giving Type: Identifying DonorsPreprint
de Oliveira, A. C. M., Croson, R. T. A., & Eckel, C. C. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1883744 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Ethical Differentiation and Market Behavior: An Experimental ApproachPreprint
Hogarth, R. M., Menestrel, M. L., & Rode, J. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.848628 · Cited by 4
Altruism in a Time of Crisis: Dissociable Social Valuation and Perception during COVID-19 in the United StatesPreprint
Luo, Y., Shuster, A., Chung, D., O’Brien, M., Heflin, M., Perl, O., Kulkarni, K., Na, S., Fiore, V. G., Montague, P. R., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-820359/v1 · Cited by 5
Assessing Large Language Models’ ability to predict how humans balance self-interest and the interest of othersPreprint
Capraro, V., Paolo, R. D., & Pizziol, V. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8ackv · Cited by 9
Investigating the effects of single-dose intranasal testosterone on economic preferences in a large randomized trial of men
Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Nave, G., Apicella, C. L., Geniole, S. N., Imai, T., Knight, E. L., Manfredi, D., Mehta, P. H., Proietti, V. M., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2508519122 · Cited by 4
“Participants played twelve rounds of what we refer to as the “charity game” (60, 61), which can be viewed as a version of the dictator game.”
You get what you deserve! Reactance, greed and altruism in the dictator game with offer suggestions by the receiver
Rodrigues, J., Caporale, L., Euen, I., Schäfer, S., Schneider, B., & Hewig, J. S. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111271 · Cited by 4
Charitable giving and intermediation: a principal agent problem with hidden prices
Chlaß, N., Gangadharan, L., & Jones, K. (2023) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpad023 · Cited by 4
Why do people give to their governments? Lab‐in‐the‐field evidence on the role of norms, social information, and political support
López‐Pérez, R., Ramirez‐Zamudio, A., & Cruz‐Martínez, G. (2023) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12583 · Cited by 4
Student Perceptions of Study Time
Bash, K. L., & Kreiner, D. S. (2014) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn19.1.3 · Cited by 4
Framing effects on bribery behaviour: experimental evidence from China and Uganda
Gaggero, A., Appleton, S., & Song, L. (2018) · Journal of the Economic Science Association · doi:10.1007/s40881-018-0049-2 · Cited by 4
“2004), public goods games (Andreoni 1995; Cookson 2000; Rege and Telle 2004), and dictator games (Eckel and Grossman 1996; * Alessio Gaggero a.gaggero@nottingham.ac.uk 1 Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK 2 School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Ningbo, China 87 1…”
Background
Circumstantial risk: Impact of future tax evasion and labor supply opportunities on risk exposure
Doerrenberg, P., Duncan, D. R., & Zeppenfeld, C. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.11.005 · Cited by 4
The Limits of Money in Daily Ridesharing: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural France
Zhu, D. (2021) · Revue d économie industrielle · doi:10.4000/rei.9984 · Cited by 3
Global Giving
Bekkers, R. (2020) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/rga2 · Cited by 4
“Choices typically made in these games stand in contrast to the prediction based on a completely self-interested model of man that dictators keep all money for themselves, especially if the recipient is deserving [116].”
Result
Temperament and Brain Networks of Attention
Rothbart, M. K., Posner, M. I., & Sheese, B. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.016 · Cited by 8
Crime-Related Exposure to Violence and Prosocial Behavior Experimental Evidence from Colombia
Bogliacino, F., Gómez, C. E., & Grimalda, G. F. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102023 · Cited by 5
Substitutes or complements: a budget-based analysis of the relationship between donating and volunteering
Voorintholt, L. (2023) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpad022 · Cited by 4
Esteem and social information: On determinants of prosocial behavior of clinicians in Tanzania
Brock, J., Lange, A., & Leonard, K. L. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.013 · Cited by 4
The relevance of irrelevant information in the dictator game
Ramalingam, A. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Care provision: An experimental investigation
Banuri, S., de Oliveira, A. C. M., & Eckel, C. C. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.016 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Competition for Power and Altruism
Bosco, L. (2011) · Forum for Social Economics · doi:10.1007/s12143-011-9087-8 · Cited by 4
“11 Eckel and Grossman 1996, for example, obtained a rather higher allocation mean using the Red Cross as responder.”
Method
Égoïste maintenant, ou altruiste (pour) demain ? Stratégies inter vs intragénérationnelles pour la conservation d’une ressource commune
Ajdukovic, I., Spiegelman, E., & Sutan, A. (2019) · Revue économique · doi:10.3917/reco.706.1153 · Cited by 4
Accuracy in Person Perception
Biesanz, J. C., & Wallace, J. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.006 · Cited by 7
Personality in Clinical Psychology
Widiger, T. A., & McCabe, G. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.042 · Cited by 5
The logic of good social relations
Kolm, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522154.009 · Cited by 4
Generosity and social distance in dictator game field experiments with and without a facePreprint
Bezu, S., & Holden, S. T. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Man Versus Nash: An Experiment on the Self-enforcing Nature of Mixed Strategy EquilibriumPreprint
Shachat, J. M., Swarthouty, J. T., & Wei, L. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Altruistic Behavior Under Incomplete InformationPreprint
Bolle, F., & Kritikos, A. S. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Tax Incidence in the Presence of Tax EvasionPreprint
Doerrenberg, P., & Duncan, D. R. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
The Effects of Knowledge Sharing on Helping Behavior: Implications for Reward System DesignPreprint
Haesebrouck, K., den Abbeele, A. G. H. L. V., & Williamson, M. G. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2648298 · Cited by 4
Other-Regarding Behavior and Behavioral Forecasts: Females Versus Males as Individuals and as Group RepresentativesPreprint
Song, F., Cadsby, C. B., & Morris, T. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.604526 · Cited by 4
Transaction Costs, the Opportunity Cost of Time and Inertia in Charitable GivingPreprint
Knowles, S., & Servátka, M. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable GivingPreprint
Samek, A. S., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2695236 · Cited by 4
“Compared to the real donation experiment with university students of Eckel and Grossman (1996), individuals in our experiment gave more.”
Preferences for ConsistencyPreprint
Falk, A., & Zimmermann, F. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1887526 · Cited by 4
To Earmark or to Non-Earmark? The Role of Control, Transparency and Warm-GlowPreprint
Özer, Ö., Urrea, G., & Villa, S. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3907401 · Cited by 4
Mindsponge-based theoretical reasoning on the political psychology that begets and empowers a dictatorPreprint
Vuong, Q. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/fua5n · Cited by 4
Good thinking: seven powerful ideas that influence the way we think
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1158 · Cited by 4
A Longitudinal Study of Multidimensional Prosocial Behavior During Adolescence
Sweijen, S., Brinke, L. T., van de Groep, S., & Crone, E. A. (2025) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.70009 · Cited by 8
“In 10 one-shot Dictator Games in randomized order, participants divided 10 coins between themselves and different charities (e.g., Amnesty International, Greenpeace, and Unicef).”
Influential
Vaccination for adults and their children: insights from survey and experimental data
Guo, Y., Peng, Y., & Wei, L. (2025) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w · Cited by 3
Narrative Identity in the Social World
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Haraldsson, K. G., & Lowe, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.035 · Cited by 2
The value of secure electricity supply for increasing acceptance of green hydrogen First experimental evidence from the virtual reality lab*
Hoffmann, C., Ziemann, N., Penske, F., & Müsgens, F. (2023) · International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) · doi:10.1109/eem58374.2023.10161844 · Cited by 4
“Afterward, the participants perform the dictator game [24]-[25], with a donation project as recipient [53]-[54].”
Background
Do White Saviour perceptions reduce charitable giving? Evidence from five online studies
Chuah, S.-H., Clarke, M., Feeny, S., Hoffmann, R., & Neelim, A. (2024) · Kyklos (Basel) · doi:10.1111/kykl.12417 · Cited by 4
Purely hedonic image concerns and audience size: Evidence from a charity dictator game
Manna, S., & Stringhi, A. (2025) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2025.102798 · Cited by 3
Two sides of the same coin: Re-examining nepotism and discrimination in a segmented society
Hofmeyr, A., & Burns, J. C. (2012) · doi:10.1080/00346764.2011.632321#.u7fr3fmsz9v · Cited by 3
Auction mechanisms for allocating subsidies for carbon emissions reduction: an experimental investigation
He, H., & Chen, Y. (2021) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-021-01318-x · Cited by 3
Virtual Economic Experiments
Chesney, T., Chuah, S., Hoffmann, R. F., Hui, W., & Larner, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316422823.010 · Cited by 3
Social Norm and Giving with Indivisibility of Money: An Experiment on Selfishness, Equity, and Generosity
Bao, T., & Yu, X. (2019) · Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE · doi:10.1628/jite-2019-0020 · Cited by 3
Being watched in an investment game setting: Behavioral changes when making risky decisions
Jia, Z. T., & McMahon, M. J. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101593 · Cited by 4
Markets for contracts: experiments exploring the compatibility of games and markets for games
Plott, C. R., & Williamson, D. V. (2000) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/pl00020946 · Cited by 3
The altruism and volunteering: aspects of interconnection in social behaviour
Fomina Olena, O., & Olentsevych, N. (2021) · Ukrainian society · doi:10.15407/socium2021.02.167 · Cited by 3
“Доцільно виокремити також роботи науковців, в яких обґрунтовується роль альтруїстичної поведінки у розвитку суспільства [8]; місце альтруїзму в системі мотивації суб’єктів, співвідношення альтруїзму, раціональності та справедливості у контексті формування суспільства добробуту [9] тощо.”
How Does Communicating Herd Immunity Affect Immunization Intentions?
Stoffel, S., & Herrmann, B. (2021) · International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics · doi:10.4018/ijabe.2021100102 · Cited by 3
Personality at Work
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. R., & Moscoso, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.040 · Cited by 4
Two Sides of the Same Coin: Re-examining Nepotism and Discrimination in a Segmented Society
Hofmeyr, A., & Burns, J. C. (2012) · Review of Social Economy · doi:10.1080/00346764.2011.632321 · Cited by 3
“This result accords with previous work, most notably in dictator games, that demonstrates an inverse relationship between the degree of anonymity in the decision being made and the size of the offer (Hoffman et al., 1996; Eckel and Grossman, 1996; Bonhet and Frey, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodResult
Leave Behind or Migrate? Evidence from a Field Experiment in China
Luo, J., & Wang, X. (2022) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101982 · Cited by 3
The growth or decay estimates for nonlinear wave equations with damping and source terms
Zeng, P., Li, D., & Li, Y. (2023) · Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering · doi:10.3934/mbe.2023623 · Cited by 3
Setting the Stage: Fairness Behavior in Virtual Reality Dictator Games
Horky, F., Krell, F., & Fidrmuc, J. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102114 · Cited by 3
An experimental study of information transparency and social preferences on donation behaviors: the self-signaling model
She, M. H. C., & Sanfey, A. G. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258808 · Cited by 3
“In order to address contextual inﬂuences in DG, some studies manipulated the source of endowment (Cherry et al., 2002) or the recipient (Eckel and Grossman, 1996), aiming to mimic characteristics of situations where people distribute resources between themselves and others.”
Background
Does gender affect medical decisions?
Godager, G., Hennig‐Schmidt, H., Li, J. J., et al. (2023) · Nordic Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.5617/njhe.10135 · Cited by 3
Transcranial electrical stimulation modulates emotional experience and metabolites in the prefrontal cortex in a donation task
Ugarte, L. M., Bortolini, T., Yao, B., Mikkelsen, M. E., Monteiro, M., Ferreira, A. C. A. D. F., Bramati, I. E., Melo, B. R. P., Hoefle, S., Meireles, F., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-64876-x · Cited by 4
The joy of ruling: an experimental investigation on collective giving
Fatás, E., & Morales, A. J. (2018) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-017-9646-4 · Cited by 3
“We replaced the collective anonymity of the recipient by a reputable Spanish charity,17 following Eckel and Grossman (1996).”
MethodResultInfluential
Models of Personality Structure
Raad, B. D., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.012 · Cited by 4
Cognitive Processes and Models
Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.028 · Cited by 5
Altruismo y fundamentos morales en adolescentes: Un estudio experimental
Salgado, M. (2022) · Revista de Sociología · doi:10.5354/0719-529x.2022.68151 · Cited by 3
“En estos contextos, los criterios de justicia van más allá de las recompensas obtenidas en el juego y se vuelcan sobre el merecimiento de los otros (Eckel & Grossman, 1996).”
Background
Does It Take More than Markets to Get Ahead?An Experimental Approach to Social Capital inSouth Africa
Carter, M. R., & Castillo, M. E. (2003) · Cited by 3

Authors: Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J.
Affiliations: Virginia Tech (US)
Wayne State University (US)
ORCID: Eckel, Catherine C.
Grossman, Philip J.
Venue: Games and Economic Behavior
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1996-10
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 181-191
ISSN: 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1006/game.1996.0081
OpenAlex: W2099209125
Cited by: 1,126
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 26 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 58
FWCI: 24.39
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
papers.ssrn.com
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords: altruism, fairness, deservingness, charitable giving, donation behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks